Remember me

Panda for MVP

August 21, 2011
Pablo Sandoval should win the NL MVP.
 
Okay…that depends on how you understand the MVP. If you're one of those persnickety people who believes that a  player’s contributions in a given season should be viewed in isolation, ignoring the contextual issues of who his teammates are and where his team finishes in the postseason, then Pablo Sandoval is not your National League MVP. Matt Kemp is.
 
If you’re the kind of person who believes that a player should be a) one of the very best players in the league, and b) someone whose team is in the playoff chase, then you can go with Ryan Braun or Prince Fielder or Roy Halladay or (the newest name being thrown into the MVP debate) Shane Victorino. They’re all almost as good as Matt Kemp, and unlike Kemp they’ll all be playing in October.
 
But…if you’re the kind of person who believes that the MVP should go to the player who is the most essential to his team’s success, the player whose value within the context of his team is higher than anyone else in baseball, the most indispensible player: then Pablo Sandoval is your man.
 
Ailuropoda Melanoleuca: A Study
 
Today….just ten minutes ago, Pablo Sandoval stepped in against Astros closer Mark Melancon in the top of the 11th inning of a tie game. There were two outs in the inning, and the Giants (the defending World Champions) were trying to avoid being swept by the Astros, a last-place team that traded away two-thirds of their outfield weeks earlier. They were trying to gain a game in the standing against Arizona, who lost 1-0 to the Braves earlier today.   
 
Sandoval homered: a two-run shot to center field. The Giants won.
 
If he hadn’t homered, if Pablo Sandoval had made an out, it is likely that the Giants would not have scored until at least the 14th inning, when Sandoval was next due up. That’s because Pablo Sandoval has been all of the Giants offense this season. All of it.
 
The Giants have played 128 games this year. Sandoval has played in just 85 of those contests: he was on the DL for all of May and half of June with a broken hand.
 
Despite having missed 34% of the season, Pablo ranks first among Giants hitters in Wins Above Replacement, with a 3.8 mark (that tally was before his two-run homer today). He is not just ahead of the next hitter on the team (Nate Schierholtz): he’s ahead of the next two hitters on the Giants (Schierholtz has a WAR of 1.6, Posey is, and will remain, at 1.4). You could add the third best player (Burrell or Sanchez, 1.0 WAR each) and Pablo is just about even: 3.8 WAR for Pablo, 4.0 WAR for SchierPosBurrChez).
 
Pablo leads the team in batting average at .309: the next best batting averages among regulars are: .289, .278, .248, .239. (That’s right: the fifth best batting average on the Giants is two-thirty-nine).

Pablo leads in on-base percentage, with a .351 mark. The next best on-base percentages among Giants players are .332, .325, .321. The average on-base percentage, across the entire National League, is .319. That’s including the pitchers.
 
Pablo leads in slugging percentage, with a .514 mark. The next best in slugging percentage is Nate Schierholtz, at .432. They are the only two Giants with a slugging percentage over .400. The NL average? .390. Again, including the pitchers. The Giants have three regulars with slugging percentages that exceed the NL average.
 
In addition to being far-and-away the best hitter in the lineup, Sandoval has had an excellent defensive season at third base. Really…by whatever metric you choose to use, Pablo has been fantastically good at third.
 
Here are the best defensive players in baseball in 2011, according to Fangraphs:
 
Brett Gardner
Dustin Pedroia
Howie Kendrick
Franklin Gutierrez
Geraldo Parra
Justin Upton
Ian Kinsler
Pablo Sandoval
Alex Rodriguez
Jacoby Ellsbury
 
Those first seven…they make sense…they’re who you’d expect. And then…Pablo Sandoval?
 
What’s most remarkable is that Sandoval has played significantly fewer games than the other players on the list…which means that on a game-by-game basis, Pablo Sandoval – possessor of a round frame and a slow gait - might be the best defensive player in baseball right now. Pick your jaw up, please.
 
Most Valuable
 
If Roy Halladay blew out his arm, the Phillies would reach the postseason. If Matt Kemp was traded to the Yankees, the Dodgers would finish about where they’ll finish anyway.
 
If Pablo Sandoval gets hurt, the Giants will not have an offense, and will miss the playoffs. It’s that simple. If Sandoval gets hurt, the Giants don’t score runs, which means they don’t win games, which means they don’t reach the playoffs.
 
There are other players for whom the same can be said: Justin Upton. Asdrubal Cabrera. But…I don’t think there is anyone else in baseball who is more necessary to their team’s success than Pablo Sandoval is for the Giants.

Is he the MVP? No…not by measures of ability. Sandoval is not a great player: he is not Kemp or Bautista or Votto. He is a very good player, on a team that has no other good offensive players.
 
But…I think that Sandoval’s story is the best story in baseball right now. Here’s a guy who struggled so badly last year, that his team benched him during the World Series. Here’s a player who got off to a great April this year, and then broke his hand, and then came back hitting like he had never gone away. Here’s a man who has the physique of a retired linebacker, who is playing defense at a crucial position better than anyone else in the major leagues. He’s a great story.
 
I root for Sandoval: I think you’d have to be a little dead inside (or from Philadelphia) to not root for the Panda; to not like the guy. That said, he is obviously not the National League MVP in 2011: he is not the best player in the league, or even one of the five best players in the league.
 
And…I don’t know of anyone else who is more valuable to their team than Pablo Sandoval is to the Giants.
 
Dave Fleming is a writer living in Wellington, New Zealand. He welcomes comments, questions, and those weird Panda hats that they wear in San Francisco, both here and at dfleming1986@yahoo.com.
 
 

COMMENTS (15 Comments, most recent shown first)

mikewright
I'm not making the argument that he's hurting the Giants. But if you're going to make the argument that he's an MVP based on his value to the team, I think you've got to overcome the team's record with and without him.
9:53 AM Sep 2nd
 
alljoeteam
I am a Giants fan, I can assure you that Pablo is a very good defensive player. He is surprisingly quick for a man of his size, has good hands, and has a great arm. Using "old school" stats (RF and F%) he is above league average.
12:16 AM Aug 29th
 
DaveFleming
Your argument being that Sandoval is hurting the Giants this year?

Pulling your chain a bit...I actually checked on that and was surprised by it...the Giants have something close to a .500 record with Sandoval, a much better record without.

Partially, this is because Buster Posey was healthy for a bit when Sandoval went down...the Giants were 14-8 with Posey and without Pablo...and then they went 8-8 with both men out.

These arguments crop up from time-to-time....someone notices that the Mets are 75-75 with Mike Piazza behind the plate, but 10-2 with Geno Petrocelli...so obviously the Mets should play play Petrocelli. It doesn't hold up.

The Giants are a better team with their best player playing....that remains true even if they had a good stretch over a short period of time when they were without him.


8:04 PM Aug 24th
 
mikewright
One problem. San Francisco was 24-16 with Pablo on the DL. With him they area .500 club.
12:06 PM Aug 24th
 
DaveFleming
Thanks, studes. By our count, Sandoval's been exceptionally good at grounders hit to his right side...

I've only watched a few Giants games this year...any Giants fans want to chime in on Sandoval's sudden defensive improvements?
3:18 PM Aug 23rd
 
studes
Just want to point out that, according to our stats here, Sandoval is the second-best third baseman in the majors.
9:14 AM Aug 23rd
 
ventboys
Nice idea, Dave. Panda has missed about the same number of games as Tulo missed last year, and Tulo finished what, fifth? I can see Panda getting fifth if he leads the Giants to the division title, but he's probably going to end up in the high teens because of his home park, the missed games, the team performance and the fact that nobody believes that he's actually that good defensively.

Ryan Braun should win it, assuming that he doesn't fall apart down the stretch. At this point his only real competition is Halladay. Kemp has been great, but writers have memories and the Dodgers are up the track.
12:18 AM Aug 23rd
 
Kev
Granderson. W/o Sandoval? Ok. But then, where are the Yankees w/o Granderson? The Red Sox probably beat them; might beat them anyway. But if they do, it won't be Granderson's fault.
11:48 PM Aug 22nd
 
pherzman
I've seen a lot of definitions of "Most Valuable" but "The player most responsible for helping his team to be 8 games over .500 at the end of August" is a new one to me.
6:29 PM Aug 22nd
 
mskarpelos
If the Giants lose Lincecum or Cain they would be in the same situation as if they lost Sandoval. Don't get me wrong. I love the Panda, and I'm glad that he's having a good year, but the Giants fortunes are much more predicated on the health and performance of their starting staff and Brian Wilson. With Wilson's recent elbow problems, I don't think the Giants can make the playoffs. Next year we'll hopefully have Buster back at full strength and Belt will take over for Huff full time at first so the Panda can get some help on the offensive end.
5:36 PM Aug 22nd
 
izzy24
By this standard who would be the MVP in the American League? It can't be anyone on the Red Sox or Yankees because they would be playoff bound either way. It can't be Jose Bats because his team won't be in the playoffs. I think Justin Verlander might be my pick.
5:07 PM Aug 22nd
 
hankgillette
I prefer an MVP that has more going for him than a good story, but that's just me.

Since ballplayers are at least theoretically fungible, I think the player with the best season should be the MVP about 96% of the time.

I understand the arguments for being on a competitive team, I think. There may be reduced pressure playing for a second division club, but I think the situational argument is unfair both to players on bad teams and to those on really good teams.


4:02 PM Aug 22nd
 
Bucky
Meh--I don't like the guy, and I don't feel dead inside. I grow weary of his antics in stretching out every at-bat. I don't care for the nickname, although that's not his fault. I mean, I don't wish him ill, but I don't get any joy in watching him play.
8:37 AM Aug 22nd
 
rgregory1956
As usual, Dave, excellent work. Panda might not be the MVP, but he just might be the MVC, Most Valuable Commodity. It depends on how one might define MVC, but the MVC of the American League might be Joe Mauer. It seems to me: as Mauer goes, so go the Twins.
8:21 AM Aug 22nd
 
sansho1
Interesting take. The more advanced that metrics get, the more I appreciate a well-argued idiosyncratic pick like Panda. At the same time, a system that spits out Panda as the eighth best defensive player in baseball makes me think there's still a ways to go.
5:54 AM Aug 22nd
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy