Remember me

Battling the Regression Dragon

February 25, 2023
 
Three baseball teams improved on their W-L record by at least twenty games last year.
 
Sweating in the high desert, the Diamondbacks went from 52 wins in 2021 to 74 wins in 2022. The Baltimore Orioles, starting at the same floor as Arizona, improved by a whopping 31 games, crossing the .500 line in a competitive AL East. Finally, the Metropolitans of Queens went from 77 wins to 101 wins.
 
Team
2021
2022
Difference
Orioles
52-110
83-79
+31
Mets
77-85
101-61
+24
D'Backs
52-110
74-88
+22
 
These are different teams, of course.
 
The Mets, with a 2022 payroll of about $260 million dollars, were improved significantly by benefiting from the deep pockets of their owner, who shelled out lots of dollars to add depth to a strong team. They’ve continued to spend this off-season, replacing Jacob deGrom with Justin Veralnder, added starter Kodai Senga from Japan, and extended Edwin Diaz and Brandon Nimmo to big contracts. They’re expected to contend in the very formidable NL East division: the recently released playoff projections at FanGraphs projects them to win 91.6 games, with an 84% chance of reaching the playoffs.
 
The Diamondbacks ($86 million in payroll, 25th in baseball) and Orioles ($43 million, last) aren’t comparable on salary, and they’re not comparable in pedigree: both squads were last-place teams whose stride forward in 2022 brought them only to 'decent' status, not World Series contender. And their improvements came about on the efforts of younger talents – notably Adley Rutschman and Zac Gallen – making their first marks on the game. Optimism for the 2023 season rests on strong farm systems loaded with more talent waiting to rise.
 
The projections reflect as much: Arizona is expected to finish 4th in the NL West, winning 77.5 games. Baltimore – lacking a franchise like the Rockies to sneer at – is expected to finish last in the AL East, with 75.7 wins. Each team has about a 10% chance of seeing extra baseball this year.
 
The projections match a broader intuitive logic about teams that improve substantially from one year to the next, which is that they are more-than-likely to return to earth. Regression is a powerful drug: Baltimore and Arizona made a leap forward from ‘very bad’ to ‘passably decent’ last season, but it’s tough to make the next leap – to legitimate contender status – one year later.
 
Is that right? Is such intuition still valid, or has the game changed enough to demand new models for how teams change?
 
 
*            *            *
 
 
One way to consider the future of the Orioles and Diamondbacks is to look at other teams that have made big leaps forward in recent years.
 
Unfortunately, the shortened COVID season of 2020 limits the scope of our analysis. The 2019 Marlins won 57 games; the 2020 team, a surprise playoff team, won games at an 84-win pace, an improvement of 27 wins. If you pro-rate the 2020 season to a full 162-game schedule, the Padres (+30) and White Sox (+24) also made comparably big leaps forward.
 
Should we consider them?
 
My instinct is to say no. The Marlins actually won 31 games in 2020, not 84. While it is possible that their performance in 2020 was indicative of a franchise taking a stride forward, to get to 84 victories, we're giving them more on credit (53 wins) than on actual work (31 wins).
 
So we have to go further back.
 
So let's consider the last five teams to actually improve by 20 or more games. How did they do after their improvement seasons? Did they stride forward, or shrink back? Was the sudden improvement a signifier of a new contender, or just a flash of luck?
 
Let’s take a look.
 
 
1.       Oakland A’s, 2017-2018
 
Billy Beane’s last rabbit-out-of-a-hat:
 
Year
2017
2018
Change
W-L
75-87
97-65
+22
 
The A’s, on the backs of a Matt Chapman breakout season, emerged from a three-year doldrum to sneak a Wild Card win. Did they remain strong, or did they fall back?
 
The A’s remained a very strong team:
 
Year
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
W-L
75-87
97-65
97-65
36-24
86-76
 
Oakland returned to the playoffs in 2019 and 2020. Astonishingly, their winning percentage repeated like Khris Davis’s batting average: .599, .599, and .600. They declined a bit in 2021, and were a losing team last year.
 
The A’s aren’t a perfect parallel to Arizona or Baltimore: they went from 76 wins to 97 wins, which is a better parallel to last year’s Mets than it is for Baltimore or Arizona. Still, the A’s should give us some optimism: they made a big step forward, and they avoided the strong pull back to the center.
 
 
2.      Minnesota Twins, 2016-2017
 
This is a slightly confusing one, as this Twins team actually made two leaps forward of 20+ games. Starting with the earlier leap:
 
Year
2016
2017
Change
W-L
59-103
85-77
+26
 
The tail-end of the Mauer-Era Twins saw a nice little spike to a Wild Card berth in 2017, before losing in the pl
 
Did this team make another stride towards competition, or did they flounder?
 
Year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
W-L
59-103
85-77
78-84
101-61
36-24
 
They floundered for a year, and then they did a second jump, improving by 23+ wins. They won the AL Central Division by a comfortable margin. And then – predictably – they got swept in the Division Series. By the Yankees.
 
The Twins repeated as the best team in the Central over the COVID-shortened 2020 campaign, and then repeated their habit of getting swept in the postseason, this time losing a Wild Card Series to Houston.
 
The Twins record in 2016 and 2017 looks a lot like the record for Baltimore and Arizona. It counts as another positive: Minnesota didn’t make the leap into contention immediately, but they did make that second leap. Consecutive division titles would be a terrific success for our aspiring squads.
 
 
3.       Arizona Diamondbacks, 2016-2017
 
Out in the desert, an earlier iteration of the Diamondbacks was making a parallel stride forward in 2017:
 
Year
2016
2017
Change
W-L
69-93
93-69
+24
 
The D’Backs, led by Paul Goldschmidt, made a surprise charge at a Wild Card slot in 2017. They notched a victory over the Rockies in the Wild Card game before getting swept by the Dodgers in the Division Series.
 
(Honestly, I had to check the records on that: I have no memory that the Rockies and Diamondbacks were the NL Wild Card teams in 2017. That feels so far from today that my mind boggles.)
 
So: did the D’Backs turn into a contender? I think you know the answer.
 
Year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
W-L
69-93
93-69
82-80
85-77
25-35
 
Arizona remained a solid baseball team, but 2017 turned out to be their peak: they just treaded water after that, and then dropped off during COVID.  This was a strong team: in addition to Goldy, the 2017 squad had J.D. Martinez, Zack Greinke, pre-tight-pants Robbie Ray, A.J. Pollock, Taijuan Walker, Patrick Corbin, and Archie Bradley as a lights-out set-up man. It was a solid team, but solid wasn’t enough.
 
 
4.       Chicago Cubs, 2014-2015
 
You might remember this team:
 
Year
2014
2015
Change
W-L
73-89
97-65
+24
 
The Chicago Cubs, with a core of prospects Kris Bryant, Anthony Rizzo, and Addison Russell, and the arms of Jake Arrieta and Jon Lester, jumped from 73 wins in 2014 to a Wild Card slot in 2015. Did they keep winning?
 
Of course.
 
Year
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
W-L
73-89
97-65
103-58
92-70
95-68
 
The Cubbies won the World Series in 2016, and then notched two more playoff appearances in subsequent years.
 
This is the dream scenario: you take a step, and suddenly you’re a dynasty. I don’t know what qualifies as ‘dynasty’ these days, but the Cubs were a terrific team, and they stayed terrific for a little while.
 
 
5.       Texas Rangers, 2014-2015
 
The Rangers are the last team to qualify, but they probably don’t belong in our discussion. I’ll tell you why, but the record, first:
 
Year
2014
2015
Change
W-L
67-95
88-74
+23
 
The 2014 Rangers had a lousy record in 2014, but they weren’t a lousy team; they were a strong team that had a one-year slump. The team – the Adrian Beltre Era Rangers - had won 90+ games each of the four previous seasons, reaching (and losing) a couple World Series along the way. The 2014 squad might’ve been the swan song of a dying empire, but it wasn’t: they came in first in the AL West in 2015, and then repeated in 2016.
 
Year
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
W-L
67-95
88-74
95-67
88-71
67-95
 
So the 2014 season was a mirage year: the real decline for the franchise started in 2018, and continues to now. They’re trying to buy their way out of it, and I’m a skeptic on their chances.
 
 
*            *            *
 
 
The projections on the Diamondbacks and Orioles suggest that they will struggle to finish above .500 this year.
 
I think that’s certainly a possibility: the Orioles play in a very difficult division, and the Diamondbacks are going to have some steep competition from the three California squads in the NL West.
 
But I’m bull-ish of the future of both teams.
 
The recent history of teams that have improved by 20+ wins suggest that such improvements are a decently strong indicator that a team is coming into a window of contention. Four of these recent teams were enough like Baltimore and Arizona to be comparable to them; four of the five teams listed were organizations that showing a spark of talent after years in the doldrums. Three of those four teams eventually turned up as reliable contenders in their divisions.
 
That’s no guarantee, but I count it as at least a strong positive. I think there’s a very good chance that Baltimore and Arizona are going to stride into being two of the stronger teams in baseball by 2024, and I don’t think it’s out of the question that at least one of them will jump the queue in 2023.
 
As to whether or not some of the fundamentals about how teams go from losing to winning: I’m less certain. It is possible that a team like Baltimore will do everything right and still lose, just because they can’t compete with the deeper pockets of other teams in their division. That is: Baltimore could turn out exactly like the Cubs of ten years ago, and wind up with nothing to show for it.
 
But that’s a pessimistic note, and we’re in the season of optimism. I’ll be rooting for both teams this year.
 
 
David Fleming is a writer living in western Virginia. He welcomes comments, questions, and suggestions here and at dfleming1986@yahoo.com. 
 
 

COMMENTS (19 Comments, most recent shown first)

evanecurb
There was an article today by Ken Rosenthal in the Athletic (link cut and pasted below) about the Orioles' prospects and future strategies. Rosenthal spoke at length with GM Mike Elias. There was one aspect of having a lot of prospects I hadn't thought of: how to fit them all on the 40 man roster. Rosenthal thinks it's likely the O's will be active at the trade deadline, using prospects to obtain players on the market. He specifically mentions Corbin Burns and Brian Reynolds.

In the article, Elias talks about the need to position the team for success for the rest of the decade, and Rosenthal infers that 2023 is not the right time to go all-in on free agent pitching, as the timeline of the pitchers acquired needs to line up with the likely peak of the young players.


[u]https://theathletic.com/4267080/2023/03/02/orioles-prospects-outlook-rosenthal/[u]
12:52 PM Mar 2nd
 
DaveFleming
Agreed, Bruce.

The Braves are adopting a strategy where they're just locking in anyone who's young and shows a glimmer of a chance. They have:

- Matt Olson - 8/$168
- Ronald Acuna - 8/$100
- Austin Riley - 10/$212
- Ozzie Albies - 7/$35 (!)
- Michael Harris Jr. - 8/$72
- Sean Murphy - 6/$73
- Spencer Strider - $6/75

That's $735 million for 53 years of peak seasons, or $13.8 million per season. Even if some of these guys flame out, that feels like a tremendous bargain for what they're collectively projected to do.




4:52 PM Mar 1st
 
evanecurb
If we go back to the 2015 Red Sox, we see a team with a losing record with two budding young stars leading in WAR (Betts and Bogaerts). Their pitching needed improvement and over the next two years they added Price, Sale, and Kimbrel at a high cost in both dollars and prospects. Later they added JD Martinez and some other high priced veterans to the roster.

It worked - they made the playoffs in 2016 and 2017 and won it all in 2018. But it cost them their best player of the last ten years and one of their best ever (Betts) when they ran out of money. They couldn't afford to lock up Betts or Bogaerts to long term deals when the time came. The luxury tax would not have allowed it to happen with Betts; I'm not sure what the particulars were with Bogaerts.

Anyhoo, when you have a player like Betts, or Juan Soto, Bryce Harper, Ronald Acuna, Aaron Judge, Mike Trout, or anyone who can reasonably be seen as one of the top 15-20 players in baseball for years to come, you need to lock him up for the long haul. Those players just don't come around often enough to allow you to fart around with their contracts.
12:27 PM Mar 1st
 
evanecurb
Terry, Dave, and TonyC:

Thanks. I love you guys, too.

I would try to explain the glitch that ended up posting my comment five(?) separate times, but it's more fun to just leave as is and pretend I actually went to the trouble to cut and paste it five different times in case anyone missed it.
11:36 AM Feb 28th
 
ventboys
Nice piece, Dave, as always. Are you planning your surprise team article, too?

I gotta ask, though, you talked about the Orioles quite a bit up there ... does anyone know what Bruce thinks about it?
12:12 AM Feb 28th
 
DaveFleming
Thanks for the extra 'love' for what the Orioles are building, Bruce! Those extra comments on the counter will surely help me when I have to negotiating salary demands with the big boss.

I share your optimism about Baltimore, and I absolutely share your faith in Rutschman: I've meant to write about him (and still might), but his arrival had an immediate impact on that franchise.

I think it's impossible to overstate how valuable it is to have a great catcher: just about every great (and great-for-a-while) team has an identifiable catcher, and great catchers tend to go hand-in-hand with winning teams. I think Baltimore is lucky to have Rutschman, and if I were given the chance to take anyone to build a team around, you'd have a hard time getting me to take anyone else.
1:06 PM Feb 27th
 
evanecurb
Regarding extending Mullins vs. Rutschman. You make a good point about age with catchers. The O's had similar hopes with Wieters 12 years ago, and it turned out to be the right call to not lock him up long term. But I think Rutschman is different.
As Dave noted, the O's won 83 games last year, so they were four games over .500. But they were 9 games under .500 (15-24) when Rutshman joined the team, 13 games over .500 from that point on. He'll be an all-star every year, I think. Lock him up now.

I'd like to see them extend Mullins as well; he's very good, just not in the same class as Adley. I think he's a very good player who will make another all-star team or two in his career.

My greater point is if it's a choice between spending money on their young players and signing free agents, I think they should spend money on the players they already have.
10:16 AM Feb 27th
 
doncoffin
I think it would be interesting to look at the teams that moved in the other direction. (Not, perhaps, interested enough to do the work myself, but interested to read about it.
7:51 PM Feb 26th
 
Gfletch
TonyClifton
What does Bruce think?

??
1:20 PM Feb 26th
 
TonyClifton
Bruce, wouldn't you be more interested in locking up Mullins? A 24 yo rookie catcher is the last guy on earth I'd feel a need to extend into his mid 30s. I'd see if his body can hold up to a major league campaign catching.....revisit him in 3 years.

Mullins is into his arbs and a FA in 2026.​
12:22 PM Feb 26th
 
TonyClifton
What does Bruce think?
11:44 AM Feb 26th
 
TonyClifton
Great piece.

Unfortunately, too many season records are largely impacted by the trading deadline nowadays. You can be pulling for, or prognosticating, a team's success, and they just decided to sell off their vets in July.

It's a shame.
11:44 AM Feb 26th
 
evanecurb
I love what the Orioles are building. They need to stay the course regardless of what their record is this year. They are setting themselves up to be contenders in the long run. It’s too early to spend on free agents or trade away prospects. If they do spend money it should be on locking up Rurschman for 10 years.
11:38 AM Feb 26th
 
evanecurb
I love what the Orioles are building. They need to stay the course regardless of what their record is this year. They are setting themselves up to be contenders in the long run. It’s too early to spend on free agents or trade away prospects. If they do spend money it should be on locking up Rurschman for 10 years.
11:38 AM Feb 26th
 
evanecurb
I love what the Orioles are building. They need to stay the course regardless of what their record is this year. They are setting themselves up to be contenders in the long run. It’s too early to spend on free agents or trade away prospects. If they do spend money it should be on locking up Rurschman for 10 years.
11:38 AM Feb 26th
 
evanecurb
I love what the Orioles are building. They need to stay the course regardless of what their record is this year. They are setting themselves up to be contenders in the long run. It’s too early to spend on free agents or trade away prospects. If they do spend money it should be on locking up Rurschman for 10 years.
11:37 AM Feb 26th
 
evanecurb
I love what the Orioles are building. They need to stay the course regardless of what their record is this year. They are setting themselves up to be contenders in the long run. It’s too early to spend on free agents or trade away prospects. If they do spend money it should be on locking up Rurschman for 10 years.
11:37 AM Feb 26th
 
evanecurb
I love what the Orioles are building. They need to stay the course regardless of what their record is this year. They are setting themselves up to be contenders in the long run. It’s too early to spend on free agents or trade away prospects. If they do spend money it should be on locking up Rurschman for 10 years.
11:37 AM Feb 26th
 
bearbyz
Shoot, I barely remember Arizona and the Rockies playoff game and I live in Colorado.

Nice article, thank you.
6:21 PM Feb 25th
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy