Remember me

From World War II to Dick Groat

February 8, 2018
  

109.  The War Years

              In 1944 Marty Marion was voted the National League’s Most Valuable Player.   He was the first shortstop ever selected as National League MVP, and the first selected as MVP by the BBWAA.  Roger Peckinpaugh (1925) was the only previous shortstop to be named the MVP, and that was in a different system.  Vern Stephens did not win the American League Award but finished third in the voting behind Detroit Tiger pitchers Hal Newhouser, who won 29 games, and Virgil Trucks, who won 27 games.   Luke Appling missed the season with Military Service. 

              We have Stephens ranked as the #1 shortstop in baseball for two seasons:

First

Last

YEAR

HR

RBI

Avg

OBA

SPct

OPS

Value

Vern

Stephens

1944

20

109

.293

.365

.462

.826

29.81

Lou

Boudreau

1944

3

67

.327

.406

.437

.843

27.34

Marty

Marion

1944

6

63

.267

.324

.362

.686

20.16

Buddy

Kerr

1944

9

63

.266

.316

.387

.703

17.50

Eddie

Miller

1944

4

55

.209

.269

.289

.558

13.59

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vern

Stephens

1945

24

89

.289

.352

.473

.825

27.47

Lou

Boudreau

1945

3

48

.307

.374

.409

.783

25.07

Luke

Appling

1945

1

10

.362

.471

.517

.989

19.40

Marty

Marion

1945

1

59

.277

.340

.370

.709

19.33

Eddie

Lake

1945

11

51

.279

.412

.410

.822

18.01

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Johnny

Pesky

1946

2

55

.335

.401

.427

.827

29.01

Lou

Boudreau

1946

6

62

.293

.345

.410

.755

26.26

Pee Wee

Reese

1946

5

60

.284

.384

.378

.762

25.33

Vern

Stephens

1946

14

64

.307

.357

.460

.817

25.15

Luke

Appling

1946

1

55

.309

.384

.378

.762

25.00

 

              Up until 1944 shortstops did not win MVP Awards, but there are only three seasons 1900-1943 in which the #1 ranked shortstop is not in the Hall of Fame—1900 (Bill Dahlen), 1914 (Art Fletcher) and 1919 (Roger Peckinpaugh).  After 1944 shortstops are winning MVP Awards pretty regularly; the NL MVP will be a shortstop in 1958, 1959, 1960 and 1962, the AL MVP in ’48,’50 and 1966.  But whereas they are all Hall of Famers up to 1944, after 1944 they are frequently not.

              The SABR biography of Vern Stephens, while it is well researched and well written, makes the mistake of turning the "biography" into an extended complaint about Stephens not being in the Hall of Fame.  Whoever edits the series should prohibit that, or dozens of biographies will become that; you could read about Dick Allen, Frank White, Lou Whitaker, Dwight Evans, Reggie Smith and Dan Quisenberry, and they all become Hall of Fame complaints.  I don’t really think that Stephens had a Hall of Fame caliber career, and I don’t think he should be in the Hall of Fame.  Certainly he had as good a career as Travis Jackson or Dave Bancroft or Lou Boudreau, but three mistakes don’t justify a fourth.

              Stephens drove in 137 runs in 1948, which at the time was a record for a shortstop.  The next year he drove in 159 runs, which is STILL a record for a shortstop, and the year after that he drove in 144.   These are the most runs ever driven in by a shortstop, top six seasons:

Rank

Player

Year

RBI

1

Vern Stephens

1949

159

2

Miguel Tejada

2004

150

3

Vern Stephens

1950

144

4

Ernie Banks

1959

143

5

Alex Rodriguez

2002

142

6

Vern Stephens

1948

137

 

              His 440 RBI in a three-year period is the tenth-highest total of all time, and the highest total between World War II and the Steroid Era, and is by far the highest total for a shortstop:            

Player

Year

RBI

Lou Gehrig

1930 to 1932

509

Babe Ruth

1929 to 1931

470

Hack Wilson

1928 to 1930

470

Jimmie Foxx

1932 to 1934

462

Babe Ruth

1926 to 1928

452

Al Simmons

1929 to 1931

450

Jimmie Foxx

1936 to 1938

445

Lou Gehrig

1927 to 1929

443

Hank Greenberg

1937 to 1939

441

Vern Stephens

1948 to 1950

440

Sammy Sosa

1999 to 2001

439

Lou Gehrig

1934 to 1936

436

Chuck Klein

1929 to 1931

436

Joe DiMaggio

1937 to 1939

433

Ken Griffey Jr.

1996 to 1998

433

 

              All Hall of Famers except Stephens and Sosa. 

              Obviously, if Stephens was the #1 shortstop in baseball in 1944-45 and drove in 440 runs from 1948-1950, that’s a really good career.  But it is natural for you to ask, if Stephens ranks as the #1 shortstop in baseball in 1945, driving in 89 runs, why does he rank third in 1949, when he drove in 159 runs?

              This chart gives Stephens’ Runs Created per season from 1942 to 1950:

Year

Team

RC

1942

StL A

83

1943

StL A

89

1944

StL A

100

1945

StL A

97

1946

StL A

73

1947

StL A

87

1948

Bos A

103

1949

Bos A

131

1950

Bos A

114

 

              The 83 runs created by Stephens in 1942 comes in a context of 1,367 runs—730 by the Browns, and 637 by their opposition. That’s 4.53 runs per team per game.  Stephens created 6.1% of all the runs in their games. We can argue that each 4.53 runs created represents a "win", or represents a "game". . .not arguing the terminology; just trying to create a consistent frame of reference. If Stephens created 83 runs and each 4.53 runs is a game, that’s 18.3 games:

Year

Team

RC

Team G

Team R

Team OR

Pct. Of Runs

Impact

1942

StL A

83

151

730

637

.061

18.3

1943

StL A

89

153

596

604

.074

22.7

1944

StL A

100

154

684

587

.079

24.2

1945

StL A

97

154

597

548

.085

26.1

1946

StL A

73

156

621

710

.055

17.1

1947

StL A

87

154

564

744

.067

20.5

1948

Bos A

103

155

907

720

.063

19.6

1949

Bos A

131

155

896

667

.084

26.0

1950

Bos A

114

154

1027

804

.062

19.2

 

              In 1943, remember, they were playing with the "balata ball", which did not jump off the bat.  (Balata was a rubber substitute used during the war, made from the dried sap of tropical trees.)  One can see that, measured in constant terms, Stephens’ impact during the war years was greater than his impact in his years in Boston, although he certainly remained a high-impact player in Boston. 

 

110.  Boudreau

              Lou Boudreau in 1948 was truly a phenom.   He hit .355 with 18 homers, drawing 98 walks while striking out only 9 times.  He hit .413 with runners in scoring position (64 for 155).   His home/road splits are remarkable:  he hit just .302 with 6 homers in his home games, but hit .403 with 12 homers, 62 RBI on the road.  He scored 74 runs in 77 road games, and had 119 hits on the road, 80 hits at home.  As a shortstop he led the league in fielding percentage (.975) and in double plays (119). 

              Boudreau also managed the team, which won the World Series.  That’s a phenomenal season.

              If you take that season out of Boudreau’s career, Boudreau isn’t within a $40 cab ride of the Hall of Fame.  He never hit .355 in any other season, and has only one other season over .307.  He never hit 18 homers in any other season; in fact, he never hit more than 10.  He never drew 98 walks in any other season, nor did he ever strike out as few as 9 times in any other season in which he had more than 2 at bats.  He scored 116 runs that year, never scored 100 in any other season.  He drove in 106 runs that season, never drove in that many in any other season, although he did drive in 100 one other time.  He never appeared in a World Series in any other season. There is NOTHING in his career that says "Hall of Famer", other than that one remarkable season:

First

Last

YEAR

HR

RBI

Avg

OBA

SPct

OPS

Value

Lou

Boudreau

1947

4

67

.307

.388

.424

.811

27.53

Pee Wee

Reese

1947

12

73

.284

.414

.426

.841

26.70

Johnny

Pesky

1947

0

39

.324

.393

.392

.785

25.97

Vern

Stephens

1947

15

83

.279

.359

.406

.765

24.63

Phil

Rizzuto

1947

2

60

.273

.350

.364

.714

22.19

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lou

Boudreau

1948

18

106

.355

.453

.534

.987

28.25

Vern

Stephens

1948

29

137

.269

.350

.471

.821

25.47

Pee Wee

Reese

1948

9

75

.274

.363

.390

.753

25.38

Eddie

Joost

1948

16

55

.250

.393

.395

.788

25.25

Phil

Rizzuto

1948

6

50

.252

.340

.328

.668

20.51

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eddie

Joost

1949

23

81

.263

.429

.453

.883

29.07

Pee Wee

Reese

1949

16

73

.279

.396

.410

.806

27.45

Vern

Stephens

1949

39

159

.290

.391

.539

.930

27.30

Phil

Rizzuto

1949

5

65

.275

.352

.358

.711

23.86

Lou

Boudreau

1949

4

60

.284

.381

.364

.745

20.44

 

              Boudreau had played basketball at the University of Illinois, where he was captain of the baseball and basketball teams.  As a basketball player he led Illinois to the Big 10 championship in 1936-37, and was named an All-American in 1937-1938.  (I love the fact that Illinois has been in the Big 10 since 1936 or whenever, and still is.)  Anyway, as a captain of his college teams Boudreau had obvious take-charge skills, and was named the manager of the Cleveland Indians in 1942.  He was 24 years old; the youngest manager in baseball history. 

              He was, in all candor, a pretty God Awful manager.  He managed a long time, was well under .500 for his career, and never had a good season as a manager other than 1948, although the 1949-1950 teams were OK, and you can’t say that those teams underperformed.

              Boudreau was notoriously slow; the first sentence of his SABR biography describes him as "slow-footed".   He had injured his ankles playing basketball, and had arthritis in his ankles, which got him deferred from World War II military service, and led to his early retirement.  Over the second half of his career he was often said to be the slowest runner in baseball.   He was, however, a very good defensive shortstop, without outstanding hands and an outstanding throwing arm.

              In 1949 the #1 shortstop in baseball was Eddie Joost.  Joost is like Vern Stephens, in that the offensive context of the late 1940s is SO dramatically different than the offensive context of his early career that the numbers don’t line up in any kind of sensible fashion.  Early in his career he was a glove wizard who didn’t hit, hitting as low as .185 with 2 homers—as a regular (1943).   Late in his career he became a 20-homer-a-season guy who walked 103 to 149 (!) times in a season for six straight seasons.  In 1949 he walked 149 times and scored 128 runs, and his usually hapless team (the Philadelphia A’s) finished 81-73. 

 

111.  Pee Wee, the Scooter, and the Dark Ages

              In 1950 Phil Rizzuto became the third shortstop in seven years to win the MVP Award.  Phil Rizzuto and Pee Wee Reese were joined at the hip in terms of public perception.  They played the same position.  They played in the same city.  They came up at almost the same time.  They played against one another in the World Series several times. They had the same initials. They both had child-like nicknames, Pee Wee and The Scooter.   They were joined like Willie, Mickey and the Duke, but even more closely, and for ten years before Willie and Mickey came to the majors. 

              The election of Pee Wee Reese to the Hall of Fame thus created great pressure to honor Rizzuto in the same fashion. I don’t believe that Rizzuto should be in the Hall of Fame—reportedly, Rizzuto didn’t believe he should, either—but I do believe that Rizzuto deserved the Most Valuable Player Award in 1950.   I think if you take everything into consideration and you weigh it properly, Rizzuto WAS the best player in the American League—in fact, the best player in baseball—in 1950. 

              Pee Wee and Alvin Dark never had magic seasons like Boudreau and Rizzuto, but they were the only shortstops in the 1950-1954 era who were on the top five list every season, and they also had their moments as the #1 player—moments that were not out of the context of their careers, like Boudreau and Rizzuto, but rather, they rated #1 in seasons that were natural parts of their careers.  Alvin Dark didn’t really have any significant power; it was just that when he played in the Polo Grounds, it was 279 feet to the left field corner, and he would lift 15 balls a year past the pole, what was called at that time a Chinese home run.   Exactly two-thirds of his career home runs (84 of 126) were hit in his home parks, and almost all of those were in the six years he played at the Polo Grounds.

First

Last

YEAR

HR

RBI

Avg

OBA

SPct

OPS

Value

Phil

Rizzuto

1950

7

66

.324

.417

.439

.856

28.34

Pee Wee

Reese

1950

11

52

.260

.369

.380

.750

23.38

Eddie

Joost

1950

18

58

.233

.373

.384

.757

22.72

Vern

Stephens

1950

30

144

.295

.361

.511

.872

22.65

Al

Dark

1950

16

67

.279

.331

.440

.770

19.69

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phil

Rizzuto

1951

2

43

.274

.350

.346

.696

24.73

Eddie

Joost

1951

19

78

.289

.409

.461

.870

24.42

Pee Wee

Reese

1951

10

84

.286

.371

.393

.763

22.89

Al

Dark

1951

14

69

.303

.352

.454

.805

22.69

Johnny

Pesky

1951

3

41

.312

.417

.398

.815

18.75

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Al

Dark

1952

14

73

.301

.357

.431

.788

23.70

Pee Wee

Reese

1952

6

58

.272

.369

.365

.734

23.04

Eddie

Joost

1952

20

75

.244

.388

.415

.803

22.64

Phil

Rizzuto

1952

2

43

.254

.337

.341

.678

21.33

Granny

Hamner

1952

17

87

.275

.307

.428

.734

20.69

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Al

Dark

1953

23

88

.300

.335

.488

.823

24.33

Pee Wee

Reese

1953

13

61

.271

.374

.420

.794

22.83

Granny

Hamner

1953

21

92

.276

.313

.455

.768

21.24

Solly

Hemus

1953

14

61

.279

.382

.443

.825

20.53

Johnny

Logan

1953

11

73

.273

.326

.398

.724

18.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pee Wee

Reese

1954

10

69

.309

.404

.455

.859

23.48

Al

Dark

1954

20

70

.293

.325

.446

.770

21.68

Granny

Hamner

1954

13

89

.299

.351

.466

.818

21.26

Harvey

Kuenn

1954

5

48

.306

.335

.390

.725

19.51

Johnny

Logan

1954

8

66

.275

.339

.373

.712

19.00

 

112. Let’s Play Two

              Pee Wee reached the majors in 1940, so by the time he moved to the top of the list in 1954 he was getting up in years.  Like Luke Appling, he aged exceptionally well, beating back generations of Dodger shortstop prospects who were supposed to take his job.  But Reese and Rizzuto and Boudreau and Stephens, like Williams and Musial, were pre-war players.  By the mid-1950s they were old men in a game long dominated by the post-war generation.

              Ernie Banks was a rookie in 1954.  Through the All Star break he had hit only 7 home runs in 79 games.   Banks was thin, and did not look like a power hitter.  Switching to a thinner bat at the All Star break, he belted 12 homers in six weeks after the All Star break.  This became a famous event, Ernie Banks’ discovery of the whip-handled bat.

              That was a repeating story in baseball for 70 years—bats getting lighter, and lighter, and lighter; you can’t exactly say where it began because it re-cycled again and again.  Hitters in Babe Ruth’s era used very heavy bats, believing (correctly) that the weight of the bat added to the power of the impact.  Gradually, however, hitters began to believe (correctly) that they could make the bat move faster, and thus make the ball jump off the bat faster, with a lighter bat.   Probably this trend started even before Babe Ruth; probably even Ruth was using a lighter bat than Dan Brouthers and Roger Connor.  Stan Musial used a lighter, thinner bat than those before him, and Roger Maris in ’61 was using a lighter bat than any power hitter before him, I believe.  It’s part of the historic movement toward three true outcomes; as pitchers relied more and more on fastballs, as pitchers threw harder and harder, batters switched to lighter bats in order to generate the bat speed necessary to cope with the heat and still drive the ball.               

First

Last

YEAR

HR

RBI

Avg

OBA

SPct

OPS

Value

Ernie

Banks

1955

44

117

.295

.345

.596

.941

25.93

Harvey

Kuenn

1955

8

62

.306

.347

.423

.769

21.75

Johnny

Logan

1955

13

83

.297

.360

.442

.802

20.98

Pee Wee

Reese

1955

10

61

.282

.371

.403

.774

18.59

Al

Dark

1955

9

45

.282

.319

.394

.713

18.42

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gil

McDougald

1956

13

56

.311

.405

.443

.848

25.69

Ernie

Banks

1956

28

85

.297

.358

.530

.887

25.44

Harvey

Kuenn

1956

12

88

.332

.387

.470

.857

23.05

Johnny

Logan

1956

15

46

.281

.340

.431

.771

18.64

Billy

Klaus

1956

7

59

.271

.378

.387

.764

17.73

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ernie

Banks

1957

43

102

.285

.360

.579

.939

28.38

Gil

McDougald

1957

13

62

.289

.362

.442

.804

24.36

Harvey

Kuenn

1957

9

44

.277

.327

.388

.715

19.73

Johnny

Logan

1957

10

49

.273

.319

.401

.720

17.10

Al

Dark

1957

4

64

.290

.326

.381

.707

16.71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First

Last

YEAR

HR

RBI

Avg

OBA

SPct

OPS

Value

Ernie

Banks

1958

47

129

.313

.366

.614

.980

29.97

Luis

Aparicio

1958

2

40

.266

.309

.345

.653

18.59

Dick

Groat

1958

3

66

.300

.328

.408

.735

18.36

Daryl

Spencer

1958

17

74

.256

.343

.406

.750

17.95

Don

Buddin

1958

12

43

.237

.349

.368

.717

15.24

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ernie

Banks

1959

45

143

.304

.374

.596

.970

30.45

Luis

Aparicio

1959

6

51

.257

.316

.332

.647

18.96

Woodie

Held

1959

29

71

.251

.313

.465

.778

18.19

Dick

Groat

1959

5

51

.275

.312

.361

.673

17.99

Daryl

Spencer

1959

12

62

.265

.332

.369

.701

17.43

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ernie

Banks

1960

41

117

.271

.350

.554

.904

27.05

Dick

Groat

1960

2

50

.325

.371

.394

.766

21.54

Ron

Hansen

1960

22

86

.255

.342

.440

.781

21.08

Luis

Aparicio

1960

2

61

.277

.323

.343

.666

18.75

Woodie

Held

1960

21

67

.258

.342

.471

.813

18.44

 

              I should write a little bit about Banks’ defense, and also about Groat and Kuenn.  Banks, like Boudreau, was a competent shortstop but not really quick enough to be a great defensive shortstop.  There is some confusion or disagreement about this point because (a) Banks has very good defensive statistics in 1959-1960, and (b) he did win the Gold Glove in 1960.   Banks in 1960 led the National League in putouts, assists, double plays and fielding percentage; in 1959 he led in assists and fielding percentage, and his .985 fielding percentage in 1959 was a National League record at the time.

              But none of that is convincing when you look at it more carefully.   The Cubs in 1959-1960 had a ground ball pitching staff with below-average numbers of strikeouts.   The team had 1,758 assists in 1959, 1,756 in 1960—large numbers, which are reliably indicative of a groundball staff.   The Cubs’ shortstop assists, relative to the team assists, were normal.  Cub pitchers led the league in walks issued in 1960 and issued the same number in 1959.  Walks by pitchers lead to additional putouts by shortstops, force outs at second.   The range numbers, in context, are fairly good but nothing more than that. 

              As to the fielding percentage "record", fielding percentages went up sharply, and steadily, for a long time.  In 19th century baseball fielders without gloves played on fields with un-mowed outfields, the weeds sometimes more than a foot high in the deep outfield.  As the fields got better and the gloves got better, the record for fielding percentage at shortstop was broken many times.  The record was broken and reset in 1899, 1901, 1903, 1905, 1908, 1912, 1913, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1926, 1927, 1937, 1942, 1959, 1971, 1972, 1979, 1999 and 2000.  Banks was one of many people who owned the record for a few years.   His career fielding percentage at shortstop was .969, against a league average of .962—good, but not sensational. 

              And as to the Gold Glove, somebody has to win it.  The National League in 1960 was in an odd condition, in that almost every team in the league was in transition at shortstop.  There were only eight teams in the league then. Several teams were using rookie shortstops and young, error-prone shortstops. The league’s traditional Gold Glove shortstop, Roy McMillan, had slipped to a part-time role.  The other top shortstop in the league, Dick Groat, although he was the MVP in 1960 as Banks had been the previous two seasons, was no quicker than Banks and was error-prone.   Banks was OK at shortstop, but he wasn’t more than that.

              Groat and Kuenn. . but first, Groat and Boudreau.  Dick Groat was in many ways like Boudreau.  He was a college basketball star, a better college player than Boudreau, and Boudreau was an All-American.  Groat played briefly in the NBA. Like Boudreau—like most basketball players attempting to play baseball--Groat was painfully slow, on a baseball field.  (Like Danny Ainge and Costen Shockley and Ryan Minor and Frank Howard and Joe Adcock.  Ryan Minor was one of the greatest college basketball players I’ve ever seen.   These guys look quick on a basketball court, because the court is small and they’re all jammed together so they change position relative to one another very rapidly. You put them on a baseball field, and you realize that they’re not quick at all, compared to baseball players.)  Like Boudreau, Groat was very much a take-charge personality, a natural captain. Like Boudreau, he won an MVP Award, and at about the same point in his career.  Groat damned near won a second one; in 1963, with the Cardinals, he was second in the MVP voting, and earned four first-place votes over Sandy Koufax, who was 25-5 with a 1.88 ERA.   Groat was very much admired in his time.

              Harvey Kuenn was the American League’s Dick Groat.   He was the same age as Groat, within a month.  They were both college men in an era in which that was still not too common.  They both came to the majors in mid-season, 1952, Groat with the last-place team in the National League, the 112-loss Pirates, and Kuenn with the last-place team in the American League, the 104-loss Tigers. 

              They were both high-average hitters.  Groat won the National League batting title in 1960, at .325, while Kuenn won the American League batting title in 1959, at .353, and also hit .332 in 1956.  Both had 200-hit seasons; Kuenn had consecutive 200-hit seasons, while Groat had 199 and 201.  But, in truth, they were not really productive hitters; they were hitters who benefitted from the batting average illusion of the time.  Groat did not walk, steal bases (at all) or hit homers.  He was a slow right-handed hitter who grounded into LOTS of double plays.  If you had him on your Strat-o-Matic team, you couldn’t WAIT to get rid of him—granting that most of the shortstops in the league were not productive hitters, either. 

              Kuenn was a better offensive player than Groat, but he was essentially similar—a right-handed singles hitter.  He hit for even higher averages than Groat, walked more than Groat but still not a lot, was faster than Groat but was not fast, had more power than Groat but not real power, and grounded into fewer double plays than Groat but still an average number. 

              Kuenn was also similar to Groat in the field; that is to say, he was not really a good shortstop.  He was a good player who was playing shortstop; he made the list of the top shortstops of 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956 and 1957, but it was not his fielding that put him there. 

              Here they part.  Groat was an intense competitor, a team leader and a guy who would "hold his teammates accountable", a tendency which I dislike in a player, by the way.   Just do your job and let the coaching staff hold your teammates accountable for their jobs; that’s my belief.  Whenever one of our scouts starts talking about some guy who will "hold his teammates accountable", I always say that "OK, we don’t want anything to do with him, then."

              Anyway, Kuenn was not like that; Kuenn was laid back and likeable. He always had a smile on his face and a plug of chewing tobacco in his jaw.  But whereas Groat’s ascent to stardom was slow and gradual, delayed two years by Korean era military service and then returning to a still-struggling Pirate franchise, Kuenn’s career was a rocket, a Rookie of the Year in 1953 who was part of a large cadre of young players who had the Tigers back in the game by 1955. 

              But Kuenn’s career was largely derailed by (1) the decision to move him to the outfield in 1958, and (2) the decision to trade him to the Indians in April, 1960.  As I’ve said, there were good reasons to move him to the outfield; he wasn’t that good a shortstop—but his bat didn’t play as well as an outfielder.  The trade to Cleveland in 1960 and then to San Francisco after the 1960 season took the shine off of him.  Players often or usually have adjustment seasons after a trade, and, moving to poorer hitters parks and moving past 30, Kuenn changed from being a guy hitting .320 in 600 at bats to a guy hitting .290 in 450 at bats.  Up until 1959 you can see him as a Hall of Fame player, but after the trades he was just another guy. 

             

             

             I seem to have posted this article twice and can't find any way to undo it except to sit here with my finger on the backspace button for a half hour, so what follows may not enhance your life to read again.  

 

  

109.  The War Years

              In 1944 Marty Marion was voted the National League’s Most Valuable Player.   He was the first shortstop ever selected as National League MVP, and the first selected as MVP by the BBWAA.  Roger Peckinpaugh (1925) was the only previous shortstop to be named the MVP, and that was in a different system.  Vern Stephens did not win the American League Award but finished third in the voting behind Detroit Tiger pitchers Hal Newhouser, who won 29 games, and Virgil Trucks, who won 27 games.   Luke Appling missed the season with Military Service. 

              We have Stephens ranked as the #1 shortstop in baseball for two seasons:

First

Last

YEAR

HR

RBI

Avg

OBA

SPct

OPS

Value

Vern

Stephens

1944

20

109

.293

.365

.462

.826

29.81

Lou

Boudreau

1944

3

67

.327

.406

.437

.843

27.34

Marty

Marion

1944

6

63

.267

.324

.362

.686

20.16

Buddy

Kerr

1944

9

63

.266

.316

.387

.703

17.50

Eddie

Miller

1944

4

55

.209

.269

.289

.558

13.59

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vern

Stephens

1945

24

89

.289

.352

.473

.825

27.47

Lou

Boudreau

1945

3

48

.307

.374

.409

.783

25.07

Luke

Appling

1945

1

10

.362

.471

.517

.989

19.40

Marty

Marion

1945

1

59

.277

.340

.370

.709

19.33

Eddie

Lake

1945

11

51

.279

.412

.410

.822

18.01

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Johnny

Pesky

1946

2

55

.335

.401

.427

.827

29.01

Lou

Boudreau

1946

6

62

.293

.345

.410

.755

26.26

Pee Wee

Reese

1946

5

60

.284

.384

.378

.762

25.33

Vern

Stephens

1946

14

64

.307

.357

.460

.817

25.15

Luke

Appling

1946

1

55

.309

.384

.378

.762

25.00

 

              Up until 1944 shortstops did not win MVP Awards, but there are only three seasons 1900-1943 in which the #1 ranked shortstop is not in the Hall of Fame—1900 (Bill Dahlen), 1914 (Art Fletcher) and 1919 (Roger Peckinpaugh).  After 1944 shortstops are winning MVP Awards pretty regularly; the NL MVP will be a shortstop in 1958, 1959, 1960 and 1962, the AL MVP in ’48,’50 and 1966.  But whereas they are all Hall of Famers up to 1944, after 1944 they are frequently not.

              The SABR biography of Vern Stephens, while it is well researched and well written, makes the mistake of turning the "biography" into an extended complaint about Stephens not being in the Hall of Fame.  Whoever edits the series should prohibit that, or dozens of biographies will become that; you could read about Dick Allen, Frank White, Lou Whitaker, Dwight Evans, Reggie Smith and Dan Quisenberry, and they all become Hall of Fame complaints.  I don’t really think that Stephens had a Hall of Fame caliber career, and I don’t think he should be in the Hall of Fame.  Certainly he had as good a career as Travis Jackson or Dave Bancroft or Lou Boudreau, but three mistakes don’t justify a fourth.

              Stephens drove in 137 runs in 1948, which at the time was a record for a shortstop.  The next year he drove in 159 runs, which is STILL a record for a shortstop, and the year after that he drove in 144.   These are the most runs ever driven in by a shortstop, top six seasons:

Rank

Player

Year

RBI

1

Vern Stephens

1949

159

2

Miguel Tejada

2004

150

3

Vern Stephens

1950

144

4

Ernie Banks

1959

143

5

Alex Rodriguez

2002

142

6

Vern Stephens

1948

137

 

              His 440 RBI in a three-year period is the tenth-highest total of all time, and the highest total between World War II and the Steroid Era, and is by far the highest total for a shortstop:            

Player

Year

RBI

Lou Gehrig

1930 to 1932

509

Babe Ruth

1929 to 1931

470

Hack Wilson

1928 to 1930

470

Jimmie Foxx

1932 to 1934

462

Babe Ruth

1926 to 1928

452

Al Simmons

1929 to 1931

450

Jimmie Foxx

1936 to 1938

445

Lou Gehrig

1927 to 1929

443

Hank Greenberg

1937 to 1939

441

Vern Stephens

1948 to 1950

440

Sammy Sosa

1999 to 2001

439

Lou Gehrig

1934 to 1936

436

Chuck Klein

1929 to 1931

436

Joe DiMaggio

1937 to 1939

433

Ken Griffey Jr.

1996 to 1998

433

 

              All Hall of Famers except Stephens and Sosa. 

              Obviously, if Stephens was the #1 shortstop in baseball in 1944-45 and drove in 440 runs from 1948-1950, that’s a really good career.  But it is natural for you to ask, if Stephens ranks as the #1 shortstop in baseball in 1945, driving in 89 runs, why does he rank third in 1949, when he drove in 159 runs?

              This chart gives Stephens’ Runs Created per season from 1942 to 1950:

Year

Team

RC

1942

StL A

83

1943

StL A

89

1944

StL A

100

1945

StL A

97

1946

StL A

73

1947

StL A

87

1948

Bos A

103

1949

Bos A

131

1950

Bos A

114

 

              The 83 runs created by Stephens in 1942 comes in a context of 1,367 runs—730 by the Browns, and 637 by their opposition. That’s 4.53 runs per team per game.  Stephens created 6.1% of all the runs in their games. We can argue that each 4.53 runs created represents a "win", or represents a "game". . .not arguing the terminology; just trying to create a consistent frame of reference. If Stephens created 83 runs and each 4.53 runs is a game, that’s 18.3 games:

Year

Team

RC

Team G

Team R

Team OR

Pct. Of Runs

Impact

1942

StL A

83

151

730

637

.061

18.3

1943

StL A

89

153

596

604

.074

22.7

1944

StL A

100

154

684

587

.079

24.2

1945

StL A

97

154

597

548

.085

26.1

1946

StL A

73

156

621

710

.055

17.1

1947

StL A

87

154

564

744

.067

20.5

1948

Bos A

103

155

907

720

.063

19.6

1949

Bos A

131

155

896

667

.084

26.0

1950

Bos A

114

154

1027

804

.062

19.2

 

              In 1943, remember, they were playing with the "balata ball", which did not jump off the bat.  (Balata was a rubber substitute used during the war, made from the dried sap of tropical trees.)  One can see that, measured in constant terms, Stephens’ impact during the war years was greater than his impact in his years in Boston, although he certainly remained a high-impact player in Boston. 

 

110.  Boudreau

              Lou Boudreau in 1948 was truly a phenom.   He hit .355 with 18 homers, drawing 98 walks while striking out only 9 times.  He hit .413 with runners in scoring position (64 for 155).   His home/road splits are remarkable:  he hit just .302 with 6 homers in his home games, but hit .403 with 12 homers, 62 RBI on the road.  He scored 74 runs in 77 road games, and had 119 hits on the road, 80 hits at home.  As a shortstop he led the league in fielding percentage (.975) and in double plays (119). 

              Boudreau also managed the team, which won the World Series.  That’s a phenomenal season.

              If you take that season out of Boudreau’s career, Boudreau isn’t within a $40 cab ride of the Hall of Fame.  He never hit .355 in any other season, and has only one other season over .307.  He never hit 18 homers in any other season; in fact, he never hit more than 10.  He never drew 98 walks in any other season, nor did he ever strike out as few as 9 times in any other season in which he had more than 2 at bats.  He scored 116 runs that year, never scored 100 in any other season.  He drove in 106 runs that season, never drove in that many in any other season, although he did drive in 100 one other time.  He never appeared in a World Series in any other season. There is NOTHING in his career that says "Hall of Famer", other than that one remarkable season:

First

Last

YEAR

HR

RBI

Avg

OBA

SPct

OPS

Value

Lou

Boudreau

1947

4

67

.307

.388

.424

.811

27.53

Pee Wee

Reese

1947

12

73

.284

.414

.426

.841

26.70

Johnny

Pesky

1947

0

39

.324

.393

.392

.785

25.97

Vern

Stephens

1947

15

83

.279

.359

.406

.765

24.63

Phil

Rizzuto

1947

2

60

.273

.350

.364

.714

22.19

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lou

Boudreau

1948

18

106

.355

.453

.534

.987

28.25

Vern

Stephens

1948

29

137

.269

.350

.471

.821

25.47

Pee Wee

Reese

1948

9

75

.274

.363

.390

.753

25.38

Eddie

Joost

1948

16

55

.250

.393

.395

.788

25.25

Phil

Rizzuto

1948

6

50

.252

.340

.328

.668

20.51

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eddie

Joost

1949

23

81

.263

.429

.453

.883

29.07

Pee Wee

Reese

1949

16

73

.279

.396

.410

.806

27.45

Vern

Stephens

1949

39

159

.290

.391

.539

.930

27.30

Phil

Rizzuto

1949

5

65

.275

.352

.358

.711

23.86

Lou

Boudreau

1949

4

60

.284

.381

.364

.745

20.44

 

              Boudreau had played basketball at the University of Illinois, where he was captain of the baseball and basketball teams.  As a basketball player he led Illinois to the Big 10 championship in 1936-37, and was named an All-American in 1937-1938.  (I love the fact that Illinois has been in the Big 10 since 1936 or whenever, and still is.)  Anyway, as a captain of his college teams Boudreau had obvious take-charge skills, and was named the manager of the Cleveland Indians in 1942.  He was 24 years old; the youngest manager in baseball history. 

              He was, in all candor, a pretty God Awful manager.  He managed a long time, was well under .500 for his career, and never had a good season as a manager other than 1948, although the 1949-1950 teams were OK, and you can’t say that those teams underperformed.

              Boudreau was notoriously slow; the first sentence of his SABR biography describes him as "slow-footed".   He had injured his ankles playing basketball, and had arthritis in his ankles, which got him deferred from World War II military service, and led to his early retirement.  Over the second half of his career he was often said to be the slowest runner in baseball.   He was, however, a very good defensive shortstop, without outstanding hands and an outstanding throwing arm.

              In 1949 the #1 shortstop in baseball was Eddie Joost.  Joost is like Vern Stephens, in that the offensive context of the late 1940s is SO dramatically different than the offensive context of his early career that the numbers don’t line up in any kind of sensible fashion.  Early in his career he was a glove wizard who didn’t hit, hitting as low as .185 with 2 homers—as a regular (1943).   Late in his career he became a 20-homer-a-season guy who walked 103 to 149 (!) times in a season for six straight seasons.  In 1949 he walked 149 times and scored 128 runs, and his usually hapless team (the Philadelphia A’s) finished 81-73. 

 

111.  Pee Wee, the Scooter, and the Dark Ages

              In 1950 Phil Rizzuto became the third shortstop in seven years to win the MVP Award.  Phil Rizzuto and Pee Wee Reese were joined at the hip in terms of public perception.  They played the same position.  They played in the same city.  They came up at almost the same time.  They played against one another in the World Series several times. They had the same initials. They both had child-like nicknames, Pee Wee and The Scooter.   They were joined like Willie, Mickey and the Duke, but even more closely, and for ten years before Willie and Mickey came to the majors. 

              The election of Pee Wee Reese to the Hall of Fame thus created great pressure to honor Rizzuto in the same fashion. I don’t believe that Rizzuto should be in the Hall of Fame—reportedly, Rizzuto didn’t believe he should, either—but I do believe that Rizzuto deserved the Most Valuable Player Award in 1950.   I think if you take everything into consideration and you weigh it properly, Rizzuto WAS the best player in the American League—in fact, the best player in baseball—in 1950. 

              Pee Wee and Alvin Dark never had magic seasons like Boudreau and Rizzuto, but they were the only shortstops in the 1950-1954 era who were on the top five list every season, and they also had their moments as the #1 player—moments that were not out of the context of their careers, like Boudreau and Rizzuto, but rather, they rated #1 in seasons that were natural parts of their careers.  Alvin Dark didn’t really have any significant power; it was just that when he played in the Polo Grounds, it was 279 feet to the left field corner, and he would lift 15 balls a year past the pole, what was called at that time a Chinese home run.   Exactly two-thirds of his career home runs (84 of 126) were hit in his home parks, and almost all of those were in the six years he played at the Polo Grounds.

First

Last

YEAR

HR

RBI

Avg

OBA

SPct

OPS

Value

Phil

Rizzuto

1950

7

66

.324

.417

.439

.856

28.34

Pee Wee

Reese

1950

11

52

.260

.369

.380

.750

23.38

Eddie

Joost

1950

18

58

.233

.373

.384

.757

22.72

Vern

Stephens

1950

30

144

.295

.361

.511

.872

22.65

Al

Dark

1950

16

67

.279

.331

.440

.770

19.69

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phil

Rizzuto

1951

2

43

.274

.350

.346

.696

24.73

Eddie

Joost

1951

19

78

.289

.409

.461

.870

24.42

Pee Wee

Reese

1951

10

84

.286

.371

.393

.763

22.89

Al

Dark

1951

14

69

.303

.352

.454

.805

22.69

Johnny

Pesky

1951

3

41

.312

.417

.398

.815

18.75

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Al

Dark

1952

14

73

.301

.357

.431

.788

23.70

Pee Wee

Reese

1952

6

58

.272

.369

.365

.734

23.04

Eddie

Joost

1952

20

75

.244

.388

.415

.803

22.64

Phil

Rizzuto

1952

2

43

.254

.337

.341

.678

21.33

Granny

Hamner

1952

17

87

.275

.307

.428

.734

20.69

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Al

Dark

1953

23

88

.300

.335

.488

.823

24.33

Pee Wee

Reese

1953

13

61

.271

.374

.420

.794

22.83

Granny

Hamner

1953

21

92

.276

.313

.455

.768

21.24

Solly

Hemus

1953

14

61

.279

.382

.443

.825

20.53

Johnny

Logan

1953

11

73

.273

.326

.398

.724

18.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pee Wee

Reese

1954

10

69

.309

.404

.455

.859

23.48

Al

Dark

1954

20

70

.293

.325

.446

.770

21.68

Granny

Hamner

1954

13

89

.299

.351

.466

.818

21.26

Harvey

Kuenn

1954

5

48

.306

.335

.390

.725

19.51

Johnny

Logan

1954

8

66

.275

.339

.373

.712

19.00

 

112. Let’s Play Two

              Pee Wee reached the majors in 1940, so by the time he moved to the top of the list in 1954 he was getting up in years.  Like Luke Appling, he aged exceptionally well, beating back generations of Dodger shortstop prospects who were supposed to take his job.  But Reese and Rizzuto and Boudreau and Stephens, like Williams and Musial, were pre-war players.  By the mid-1950s they were old men in a game long dominated by the post-war generation.

              Ernie Banks was a rookie in 1954.  Through the All Star break he had hit only 7 home runs in 79 games.   Banks was thin, and did not look like a power hitter.  Switching to a thinner bat at the All Star break, he belted 12 homers in six weeks after the All Star break.  This became a famous event, Ernie Banks’ discovery of the whip-handled bat.

              That was a repeating story in baseball for 70 years—bats getting lighter, and lighter, and lighter; you can’t exactly say where it began because it re-cycled again and again.  Hitters in Babe Ruth’s era used very heavy bats, believing (correctly) that the weight of the bat added to the power of the impact.  Gradually, however, hitters began to believe (correctly) that they could make the bat move faster, and thus make the ball jump off the bat faster, with a lighter bat.   Probably this trend started even before Babe Ruth; probably even Ruth was using a lighter bat than Dan Brouthers and Roger Connor.  Stan Musial used a lighter, thinner bat than those before him, and Roger Maris in ’61 was using a lighter bat than any power hitter before him, I believe.  It’s part of the historic movement toward three true outcomes; as pitchers relied more and more on fastballs, as pitchers threw harder and harder, batters switched to lighter bats in order to generate the bat speed necessary to cope with the heat and still drive the ball.               

First

Last

YEAR

HR

RBI

Avg

OBA

SPct

OPS

Value

Ernie

Banks

1955

44

117

.295

.345

.596

.941

25.93

Harvey

Kuenn

1955

8

62

.306

.347

.423

.769

21.75

Johnny

Logan

1955

13

83

.297

.360

.442

.802

20.98

Pee Wee

Reese

1955

10

61

.282

.371

.403

.774

18.59

Al

Dark

1955

9

45

.282

.319

.394

.713

18.42

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gil

McDougald

1956

13

56

.311

.405

.443

.848

25.69

Ernie

Banks

1956

28

85

.297

.358

.530

.887

25.44

Harvey

Kuenn

1956

12

88

.332

.387

.470

.857

23.05

Johnny

Logan

1956

15

46

.281

.340

.431

.771

18.64

Billy

Klaus

1956

7

59

.271

.378

.387

.764

17.73

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ernie

Banks

1957

43

102

.285

.360

.579

.939

28.38

Gil

McDougald

1957

13

62

.289

.362

.442

.804

24.36

Harvey

Kuenn

1957

9

44

.277

.327

.388

.715

19.73

Johnny

Logan

1957

10

49

.273

.319

.401

.720

17.10

Al

Dark

1957

4

64

.290

.326

.381

.707

16.71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First

Last

YEAR

HR

RBI

Avg

OBA

SPct

OPS

Value

Ernie

Banks

1958

47

129

.313

.366

.614

.980

29.97

Luis

Aparicio

1958

2

40

.266

.309

.345

.653

18.59

Dick

Groat

1958

3

66

.300

.328

.408

.735

18.36

Daryl

Spencer

1958

17

74

.256

.343

.406

.750

17.95

Don

Buddin

1958

12

43

.237

.349

.368

.717

15.24

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ernie

Banks

1959

45

143

.304

.374

.596

.970

30.45

Luis

Aparicio

1959

6

51

.257

.316

.332

.647

18.96

Woodie

Held

1959

29

71

.251

.313

.465

.778

18.19

Dick

Groat

1959

5

51

.275

.312

.361

.673

17.99

Daryl

Spencer

1959

12

62

.265

.332

.369

.701

17.43

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ernie

Banks

1960

41

117

.271

.350

.554

.904

27.05

Dick

Groat

1960

2

50

.325

.371

.394

.766

21.54

Ron

Hansen

1960

22

86

.255

.342

.440

.781

21.08

Luis

Aparicio

1960

2

61

.277

.323

.343

.666

18.75

Woodie

Held

1960

21

67

.258

.342

.471

.813

18.44

 

              I should write a little bit about Banks’ defense, and also about Groat and Kuenn.  Banks, like Boudreau, was a competent shortstop but not really quick enough to be a great defensive shortstop.  There is some confusion or disagreement about this point because (a) Banks has very good defensive statistics in 1959-1960, and (b) he did win the Gold Glove in 1960.   Banks in 1960 led the National League in putouts, assists, double plays and fielding percentage; in 1959 he led in assists and fielding percentage, and his .985 fielding percentage in 1959 was a National League record at the time.

              But none of that is convincing when you look at it more carefully.   The Cubs in 1959-1960 had a ground ball pitching staff with below-average numbers of strikeouts.   The team had 1,758 assists in 1959, 1,756 in 1960—large numbers, which are reliably indicative of a groundball staff.   The Cubs’ shortstop assists, relative to the team assists, were normal.  Cub pitchers led the league in walks issued in 1960 and issued the same number in 1959.  Walks by pitchers lead to additional putouts by shortstops, force outs at second.   The range numbers, in context, are fairly good but nothing more than that. 

              As to the fielding percentage "record", fielding percentages went up sharply, and steadily, for a long time.  In 19th century baseball fielders without gloves played on fields with un-mowed outfields, the weeds sometimes more than a foot high in the deep outfield.  As the fields got better and the gloves got better, the record for fielding percentage at shortstop was broken many times.  The record was broken and reset in 1899, 1901, 1903, 1905, 1908, 1912, 1913, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1926, 1927, 1937, 1942, 1959, 1971, 1972, 1979, 1999 and 2000.  Banks was one of many people who owned the record for a few years.   His career fielding percentage at shortstop was .969, against a league average of .962—good, but not sensational. 

              And as to the Gold Glove, somebody has to win it.  The National League in 1960 was in an odd condition, in that almost every team in the league was in transition at shortstop.  There were only eight teams in the league then. Several teams were using rookie shortstops and young, error-prone shortstops. The league’s traditional Gold Glove shortstop, Roy McMillan, had slipped to a part-time role.  The other top shortstop in the league, Dick Groat, although he was the MVP in 1960 as Banks had been the previous two seasons, was no quicker than Banks and was error-prone.   Banks was OK at shortstop, but he wasn’t more than that.

              Groat and Kuenn. . but first, Groat and Boudreau.  Dick Groat was in many ways like Boudreau.  He was a college basketball star, a better college player than Boudreau, and Boudreau was an All-American.  Groat played briefly in the NBA. Like Boudreau—like most basketball players attempting to play baseball--Groat was painfully slow, on a baseball field.  (Like Danny Ainge and Costen Shockley and Ryan Minor and Frank Howard and Joe Adcock.  Ryan Minor was one of the greatest college basketball players I’ve ever seen.   These guys look quick on a basketball court, because the court is small and they’re all jammed together so they change position relative to one another very rapidly. You put them on a baseball field, and you realize that they’re not quick at all, compared to baseball players.)  Like Boudreau, Groat was very much a take-charge personality, a natural captain. Like Boudreau, he won an MVP Award, and at about the same point in his career.  Groat damned near won a second one; in 1963, with the Cardinals, he was second in the MVP voting, and earned four first-place votes over Sandy Koufax, who was 25-5 with a 1.88 ERA.   Groat was very much admired in his time.

              Harvey Kuenn was the American League’s Dick Groat.   He was the same age as Groat, within a month.  They were both college men in an era in which that was still not too common.  They both came to the majors in mid-season, 1952, Groat with the last-place team in the National League, the 112-loss Pirates, and Kuenn with the last-place team in the American League, the 104-loss Tigers. 

              They were both high-average hitters.  Groat won the National League batting title in 1960, at .325, while Kuenn won the American League batting title in 1959, at .353, and also hit .332 in 1956.  Both had 200-hit seasons; Kuenn had consecutive 200-hit seasons, while Groat had 199 and 201.  But, in truth, they were not really productive hitters; they were hitters who benefitted from the batting average illusion of the time.  Groat did not walk, steal bases (at all) or hit homers.  He was a slow right-handed hitter who grounded into LOTS of double plays.  If you had him on your Strat-o-Matic team, you couldn’t WAIT to get rid of him—granting that most of the shortstops in the league were not productive hitters, either. 

              Kuenn was a better offensive player than Groat, but he was essentially similar—a right-handed singles hitter.  He hit for even higher averages than Groat, walked more than Groat but still not a lot, was faster than Groat but was not fast, had more power than Groat but not real power, and grounded into fewer double plays than Groat but still an average number. 

              Kuenn was also similar to Groat in the field; that is to say, he was not really a good shortstop.  He was a good player who was playing shortstop; he made the list of the top shortstops of 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956 and 1957, but it was not his fielding that put him there. 

              Here they part.  Groat was an intense competitor, a team leader and a guy who would "hold his teammates accountable", a tendency which I dislike in a player, by the way.   Just do your job and let the coaching staff hold your teammates accountable for their jobs; that’s my belief.  Whenever one of our scouts starts talking about some guy who will "hold his teammates accountable", I always say that "OK, we don’t want anything to do with him, then."

              Anyway, Kuenn was not like that; Kuenn was laid back and likeable. He always had a smile on his face and a plug of chewing tobacco in his jaw.  But whereas Groat’s ascent to stardom was slow and gradual, delayed two years by Korean era military service and then returning to a still-struggling Pirate franchise, Kuenn’s career was a rocket, a Rookie of the Year in 1953 who was part of a large cadre of young players who had the Tigers back in the game by 1955

             

 

 

 
 

COMMENTS (31 Comments, most recent shown first)

bjames
I very much appreciate klamb's words about Harvey Kuenn. I had the same thought as 337 about it being a little odd that Kuenn was a successful manager, so I e-mailed a friend who had written a book about one of Kuenn's teams to confirm that I was not mis-stating the personality. He confirmed that Kuenn was what I had said that he was--but klamb's description is much more powerful and more meaningful. So thanks.
1:24 PM Apr 17th
 
MarisFan61
....I guess I should explain why I said the thing about Reader Posts.
It was in case we were going to get into an extended thing about that (which I do think people would be interested in), which would have been off the subject of this article. Sometimes we do get into major side-things under the articles but I assume that the authors prefer we don't.
9:20 AM Feb 14th
 
MarisFan61
Km: Thanks! and it's fine -- no need to go anywhere on the site before anywhere else.
Lots of the people doing these comments (and on "Hey Bill") aren't on Reader Posts.
9:16 AM Feb 14th
 
klamb819
MarisFan, Kuenn was just that nice in general, and I was 1) an obvious neophyte, & 2) a grateful learner.

Should I have introduced myself on Reader Posts before posting here? Let me know. (I guess I'm a neophyte once again.) I wasn't going to say anything until I saw 337's good observation and thought I could add to it.


12:08 AM Feb 14th
 
MarisFan61
Km: I have to ask (and I think others would be interested too), how did you and Kuenn start getting on like that? And, how do you see what was in it for him to give a young reporter that kind of attention and company? Maybe the answer is just that you're terribly loveable....
BTW it would probably be better to do this on Reader Posts, but I don't know if you're on there. If you are, we'd love it for you to come over and talk about it, but if not, maybe you can say some more about it here.
8:56 PM Feb 13th
 
klamb819
Players would have done anything for the Harvey Kuenn I knew. When I was way too young & foolish as the Brewers' beat writer in 1974, Kuenn was the hitting coach and took me under his wing. Taught me how to tip and travel, introduced me to people around the AL, gave me my first real briefcase, and tipped me off to break the Spring Training story that the starting SS would be 18-year-old Robin Yount. A wonderful man.
6:05 PM Feb 13th
 
DaveNJnews
I just wanted to chime in that I am finding this series remarkably enjoyable.
4:28 PM Feb 12th
 
Manushfan
For me I've always liked looking at those late 40s Red Sox teams, and Stephens especially. He had some great years and fit there really well. I don't think he's ever gotten his due, honestly, written off as a 'park product' and drunken malcontent etc. Which is a shame. That's an impressive bat.

As for Scooter making the Hall, I never thought he belonged, but I don't care either, he's in and that's fine. I don't think Stephens nec. belongs, I've not gotten a decent read on Vern's glove either.

Can't wait for the OF lists to start, I think the names 'Berger' and 'Bob Johnson' will be prominently featured.
9:44 AM Feb 10th
 
KaiserD2
Continuing about this discussion of Rizzuto, Reese, Stephens, etc.

36 year ago a young man named Bill James burst upon the scene with a lot of new insights about baseball statistics. Among other things, he told us again and again that offensive performance had to take account of two factors that could severely distort traditional statistics: the park that a player played in, and the era that he was playing in. What is amazing to me is how hard it remains, it seems, to keep those things in mind.

Thus, we are still shocked (and I was too when I figured WAA for Stephens in 1950) by finding that Phil Rizzuto was a more effective offensive player that year than Stephens was because we are forgetting about the impact of Fenway Park and Yankee Stadium. And the same is true in our opinions of the teams they played for. In 1948-50, the Red Sox had significantly better pitching than the Yankees did, while the Yankees had significantly stronger lineups--but people are still amazed to hear that. The same was true, by the way in 1977-8. The second reason Stephens looks so good is his RBIs which as I already noted are largely a function of whom he hit behind.

The same mistake has been made regarding Reese and Rizzuto. Using WAA with DRA for fielding statistics I found Rizzuto's four best seasons to be 1942 (4.7 WAA--he was great in the field that year), 1950 (3.5), 1941 (2.4) and 1947 (2.1). Those were, in fact, the only years in which Rizzuto was as much as 1 win above average. Reese's top four seasons are also 1942 (3.4, again largely from fielding), 2.9 (1947), 2.6 (1954), and . 2.3 (1949). Now Reese was a more valuable player in his next three seasons than Rizzuto was in his, scoring in the 1-2 WAA range, but their peaks are pretty near identical and Rizzuto had the best two seasons. But Reese played in Ebbetts Field, Rizzuto in Yankee Stadium.

Now I don't agree with what Bill said about Lou Boudreau, whom i show with four seasons of 4 WAA or more and two more in the 2-3 WAA range. Two of his 4+ seasons were in 1943-4 and were helped by the war, but the other two, including his best one, were 1947-8, so, like Hal Newhouser, he proved that he was a great player, war or no war. Boudreau and Vaughn both topped 4 WAA four times and Cronin did it three times and the two of them are therefore, for me, in a very different class from Rizzuto, Reese, and Stephens. Stephens would be exhibit A in a demonstration that Reese and Rizzuto got into the Hall thanks to their teammates. I think it would be possible to find other exhibits just as good.

Anybody who doesn't like my specific method is welcome to use something else, but I do believe very strongly that any method that rigorously factors out ballparks and eras will continue to change our opinions of a lot of players.
8:20 AM Feb 10th
 
MarisFan61
re Rizzuto/Stephens in 1950 -- in case it might be of interest what the "WAR" system says:
It says the same -- hugely.

As shown on baseball-reference.com:
Defensive WAR: Rizzuto 2.1, Stephens 1.0
Offensive "WAR" (!!!): Rizzuto 5.6, Stephens 3.6.

Those offense data are shocking, aren't they, in view of the guys' bare stats. I'd guess that no matter how sabermetrically sophisticated you are, you wouldn't guess there could be that kind of difference in favor of the guy with the lesser numbers, when one guy is 7-66, .324 and the other guy is 30-144, .295, even when you know there's a big Park Factor thing going on. Some difference in favor of the 'lesser' guy, sure, but I don't think you'd imagine it could be anything like 5.6 to 3.6.

BTW: On offensive Win Shares (according to the site The Baseball Gauge, no idea how closely they follow Bill's method but I figure it's at least quite good), it's Rizzuto 24, Stephens 17.
(They do show decimals but screw that.) :-)​
10:26 PM Feb 9th
 
wilbur
I believe the only player to lead the NBA in scoring and assists in the same season was Kansas City's Nate Archibald. I know he did it, I'm just not positive no one else has since then.

He played a helluva center field too, coulda' been an All-Pro cornerback and could skate like Yvan Cournoyer on the right wing.
6:54 PM Feb 9th
 
DaveNJnews
(My favorite Dick Groat fact: he is the only player to lead the NCAA in scoring and assists in the same season. At least that's what his SABR bio says, and I know no one has done it since then.)

In the NBA last year, Russell Westbrook was first in points and second in assists. James Harden was first in assists, second in points.
5:19 PM Feb 9th
 
dbutler69
I'm with joedimino. I have Scooter higher on my shortstop rankings than most because I do give him more "war credit" than most.
2:47 PM Feb 9th
 
sansho1
Marisfan, in retrospect I think you're right. I came away thinking Rizzuto was good enough that his candidacy wasn't as ridiculous as I'd believed, but reinforced in the belief he didn't belong. I was reminded of Bill's long essay on Johnny Evers, which also brought to light the underappreciated skills of bantamweight middle infielders, except then in service of boosting Evers as a legit HOFer.
12:25 PM Feb 9th
 
MarisFan61
About Rizzuto in Bill's Hall of Fame book (which I always think of by its original name, which I was sorry to see having been changed), a couple of things:

-- Although ending with the damning-with-faint-praise thing that Sansho mentioned, it seemed to me that the content of what Bill said actually buttressed Rizzuto's HOF-worthiness far more than it opposed existing impressions. There's a fair bit of stuff in there that showed a solid rationale for considering him a Hall of Famer -- by which I mean, rationale for some to consider him a Hall of Famer, stuff totally separate from "he's lovable" or "Pee Wee is in, so....."

-- And in fact, especially since (as it appears) Bill likes writing in kind of a stream-of-consciousness way and so it can be possible to tell such things:
It seemed pretty clearly to me (some emphasis here on "seemed," more than on "clearly") :-) .....that Bill was SURPRISED, as he went along, about positive things he found on Rizzuto, and that despite that final lukewarm thing, he probably wound up thinking of Rizzuto as, at least, not as bad of a Hall of Fame candidate as he had thought before.

I absolutely had the impression that in his analysis of Rizzuto vs. Stephens for the 1950 season, we see surprise as he goes along about how well Rizzuto is showing and that he was fairly shocked at his finding that Rizzuto was not only a better player that year but even simply a better OFFENSIVE player. It's possible of course that his manner of expressing it was just that he knew most readers would be shocked at the findings, but, well, my impression was that the writing reflected great surprise on his own part too.
11:45 AM Feb 9th
 
danjeffers
Re: JoeDimino's comment below about credit for Rizzuto's wartime seasons, I did a quick JAWS recalculation for Rizzuto by giving him bWAR credit using the average of his 1941 and '42 seasons for 1943-45 (I hadn't know about the malaria problem and didn't adjust '46). The result moved him up about 12 slots in rankings, comparable to Bert Campaneris and Luis Aparicio, but still way short of Reese. I did the same recalculation for Reese and it moved him up into the top 5 (JAWS-measured) shortstops of all time, ahead of Arky Vaughan and Robin Yount.
11:36 AM Feb 9th
 
wilbur
I never heard Rizzuto the announcer until the mid-80s when I moved to South Florida where Yankee games were shown on the television machine Sundays and occasionally midweek.

I thought he was great. An idiosyncratic style to be sure, but you couldn't help but like him and feel a connection to him. So different from the former player "analysts" with whom we are burdened now, for whom I wear out the mute button. And get off my lawn too.

My favorite Dick Groat fact: he is the only player to lead the NCAA in scoring and assists in the same season. At least that's what his SABR bio says, and I know no one has done it since then.

Another shortstop, Don Kessinger, was voted to the 5-man All-SEC basketball team for the decade of the 60s.

Love these articles/essays, Mr. Bill. They're about the closest thing you do to Historical Abstracts, and I love 'em.
11:14 AM Feb 9th
 
KaiserD2
I'd like to comment on Vern Stephens' RBI totals, which are the best illustration available of the problems of RBIs as a stat.

Stephens was a fine player, who became a very good shortstop starting in 1944 in the field. He had quite a few dramatic clutch hits in 1948 as I documented in Epic Season although he faded in the last month, perhaps because he played every inning that year (and the next). And yes, in 1948-50, he drove in 137, 159, and 144 runs. And he should have driven in 160 in 1949, but in the last inning of the last game, Ted Williams was on second base when Stephens singled but held up at third with the Red Sox behind 5-0. thereby preserving Ted's share of the RBI title and his chance at the Triple Crown. (George Kell passed Ted for the batting title that day.)

However, based on my calculations of WAA, Stephens earned 2.6 WAA in 1948 (a good but not great figure), 4.3 in 1949 (his only superstar season), and just .4 WAA in 1950. I know you're thinking Kaiser must be crazy about that one, but look at baseball-reference.com: playing in Fenway, Stephens at the plate created just 9 runs above average at the plate that year.

He drove in so many runs because he was hitting behind Dom DiMaggio, Johnny Pesky, and Ted Williams (for half of 1950) who almost surely had an average OBP of more than .400 among them in those years. RBI, I would argue, are a function of the hitter's slugging percentage and of the number of men on base when he comes up. The example of Stephens suggests that the latter factor is at least as important as the former.

In his four best seasons Stephens was over 4 WAA once over 3 WAA once (1944), and over 2 WAA twice more. Phil Rizzuto matches those figures exactly--their impact was very similar. Rizzuto had a longer career but he was average or worse than average from 1952 onward I don't think Stephens belongs in the Hall of Fame.

David K




9:07 AM Feb 9th
 
sansho1
Many here remember that Rizzuto's HOF candidacy was the leitmotif of The Politics of Glory aka Whatever Happened To the Hall of Fame? aka The Awakening of My Disillusionment With the Concept of Boards and Committees. I appreciated Bill's approach -- pick up the mantle, carry it as far as you can, then set it down lightly. The coda to his case against electing Rizzuto (paraphrasing -- "Eh, he'll probably get in, and he won't be the worst player there.") was an object lesson in how to conclude one's argument -- you've made your case, there's nothing more to be done.
7:13 AM Feb 9th
 
Riceman1974
I remember how the "Rizzuto for the Hall of Fame" becane a cottage industry in the 1980s, and discussed endlessly. The key point in the pro-Scooter argument as Bill stated, was that Reese was in and hence so should the Scooter. But Reese was a far better player than Rizzuto. Reese was twice the hitter and essentially even defensively. I always thought the Reese comparison to Rizzuto was fatuous.
4:12 AM Feb 9th
 
shthar
Let's print two!
1:53 AM Feb 9th
 
MarisFan61
I'm with Bob.
I felt similarly about how the write-ups in the New Historical Abstract went all the way down to #100 at each position, plus listings all the way down to #125.
9:51 PM Feb 8th
 
BobGill
My favorite thing about this series is the occasional discussions of guys like Groat, Kuenn and Eddie Joost (one of my particular favorites), along with the presence of others like Woodie Held and Johnny Logan in the lists. Not that the Hall of Famers don't deserve to be written about too -- but there's already so much about them, and often so very little about the Bob Elliots and so on. This is one of the very few places where the lesser lights get their due, and I love that.
7:59 PM Feb 8th
 
joedimino
Regarding Rizzuto, he lost his age 25-27 seasons to the war. When he came back in 1946, he was suffering from the after effects of malaria, so really, he lost 25-28. A few years later he won an MVP Award and deserved it.

He probably deserves more ‘war credit’ than any borderline Hall of Famer. Just something to keep in mind when evaluating his resume.
5:49 PM Feb 8th
 
MarisFan61
.....On second look, I guess you knew that! Maybe that's exactly what you were talking about.
5:17 PM Feb 8th
 
MarisFan61
Brian: In the New Historical Abstract, Bill noted that the Win Share system showed Rizzuto as the best-ever SS on the double play.
Dunno the extent to which Gordon contributed to that, but he probably didn't suk. :-)
4:34 PM Feb 8th
 
DaveNJnews
Reading this makes me wonder if there were one or more prominent sportswriters in the 1940s touting the idea that an outstanding defensive shortstop was worthy of MVP consideration, even if he didn't hit all that much.

That idea does seem to have taken hold with Marty Marion and stuck around for at least a couple decades.
4:29 PM Feb 8th
 
brian14leonard
Bill, do you still show Rizzuto and Gordon as the best double play combo ever? To me, that would add some luster to his Hall of Fame status. My head says that Scooter probably doesn't belong, but my heart agrees with hotstatrat...
3:23 PM Feb 8th
 
hotstatrat
Holy cow, as a kid, I enjoyed Phil Rizzuto's enthusiastic game broadcasts. Considering that and his playing career, I am happy he is in the Hall of Fame. Later in my teen and early adult years, Rizzuto would drift off about his golf game or some silly thing, so I don't give him tons of points for the longevity of his broadcasting career, but it was 50+ years long.

Good catches there, Maris Fan. I was squinching my brows over the Boudreau comment wondering what the heck he was good at defensively.
3:17 PM Feb 8th
 
MarisFan61
...sorry about this #2 thing (leaving an easy trash-talk rejoinder on purpose) but maybe to help avoid confusion, although maybe it'll be obvious to everybody: the Boudreau thing should probably read 'with' outstanding hands and an outstanding throwing arm.
Sorry, but hope it helps. Part of why I'm doing it is that I imagine this series might become a book, as I hope it will.
11:46 AM Feb 8th
 
MarisFan61
BTW, in the 1st pgph, the Tiger pitcher you mean who won 27 in addition to Newhouser's 29 was Dizzy Trout. It jumped out at me because I was pretty sure Virgil Trucks never won anywhere close to that many. BTW, Trucks was out that year for the war.
11:38 AM Feb 8th
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy