BILL JAMES ONLINE

So How Many Gold Gloves SHOULD Brooks Robinson Have Won?

May 16, 2023
Introduction
 
Bill recently published a series of articles on the topic of players who are "overrated" and "underrated", taking the approach of comparing honors to accomplishments. My article is a bit of a spinoff of one of the points he touched on in that series.
 
So, the big question is…..what kind of "spinoff" will this be? Will it be "Frasier"? Or will it be "The Tortellis"? "Cheers" to you if you can predict the right answer.
 
Anyway, the spinoff in this case is based on Bill’s reference to the role that Gold Glove awards have played in bestowing honors on players, particularly in cases where a player gained such a strong defensive reputation that he won the award an inordinate number of times.
 
Here's one key excerpt (bold emphasis is mine):
 
But since the fans had no other regular frame of reference as to who was a good fielder until recent years, a Gold Glove was a semi-permanent endorsement of his defensive quality.   If a player had a bad defensive year the next year. . .well, he’d probably win the Gold Glove again anyway, just because that was the way it was done.   If he didn’t repeat as the Gold Glove winner, his reputation as defensive standout stuck with him anyway, at some level. 
 
Another one:
 
But the Gold Glove voting, until about 2010, was just terrible.   They would just hand out the ballots, and people could write in whoever you want. A certain number of the voters—let’s guess 30%--had not given the issue one second’s thought before the ballot was in their hand, and they would just write in whoever was obvious.   After a player had won a couple of Gold Gloves, he became the obvious choice.  
 
And another:
 
So Gold Glove voting, until about 2010, was very, very sloppily awarded, and was dominated by repeat winners.
 
The domination of Gold Glove by certain players was something that was in full force when I was a young fan. I started following baseball around 1969, and repeat winners were abundant in my youth.
 
For example, in the National League:
 
·         Johnny Bench had established himself as a Gold Glove catcher starting in 1968, and he would proceed to win 10 in a row.

·         Bob Gibson was honored 9 straight seasons from 1965-1973 as the best fielding pitcher.

·         At first base, Wes Parker won 6 in a row rom 1967-1972.

·         Doug Rader was just beginning a run of 5 straight awards from 1970-1974.

·         In the outfield, the same 3 players won every award from 1963-1968: Curt Flood, Willie Mays, and Roberto Clemente. Flood ended up with 7 total honors in his career (all in consecutive seasons), while Mays and Clemente each ended up with 12 in a row as well.
 
In the American League, there was a lot of the same:
 
·         Pitcher Jim Kaat ran off 14 in a row before hopping over to the National League to pick up 2 more.

·         Al Kaline took the Gold Glove 10 times in 11 years (somehow they missed him in 1960), and Paul Blair won 8 times in 9 years.

·         And, of course, Brooks Robinson won 16 straight times from 1960-1975.
 
And these were not isolated instances. Through the years, Greg Maddux, Ivan Rodriguez, Ken Griffey Jr., Ichiro Suzuki, Andruw Jones, Keith Hernandez, Mike Schmidt, Roberto Alomar, Ryne Sandberg, Bill Mazeroski, Vic Power, Omar Vizquel, Mark Belanger, Don Mattingly, Torii Hunter, and many others have had long stretches of domination in the awarding of Gold Gloves. Nolan Arenado currently has an active streak of 10 straight NL Gold Gloves (his first 10 seasons at that).
 
No doubt many of those honors (maybe even most of them) were deserved. But I have to believe that many cases (as Bill alluded to) were simply a result of voters reflexively honoring players who had established a reputation of outstanding defense, and the simplest thing to do was to just keep honoring the same ones again and again until someone new came along who demanded attention.
 
I think there are 2 underlying reasons that contributed to that dynamic:
 
1)      There was a lack of defensive statistical standards of excellence
2)      The notion that defensive performance is a "constant"
 
As to the first point, I believe part of the issue is something Bill has written about previously, and that is the power of statistics as a "language". On the offensive side of the game, we know what 40 home runs mean, or 100 RBI, or 50 stolen bases, or a .300 average, or a .400 OBP. These statistics tell us something about the player and everyone understands the numbers, even as statistical standards can change over time. We have a good idea of what they represent. We are relatively fluent in them.
 
In more recent years, I would also say that standards have been developing around WAR. For example, it’s working its way into baseball language that a season with 5 WAR is roughly an "All Star" level type of season, and a season with 8 WAR is getting you up into MVP territory.   Not that those are hard and fast thresholds, of course, and not that awards would necessarily be bestowed just from that information alone. But I do think that it is achieving a bit of a "power of language" standard that fans are getting fluent in. 
 
I would say defensive stats, however, still do not possess that, and they certainly didn’t over the bulk of the Gold Glove award’s history. I would also say defensive stats were also generally not well known. Did Gold Glove voters traditionally have easy access to even basic things like putouts, assists, and errors? Maybe yes, maybe no. I’m not sure. But I doubt that voters were armed with much ammunition, and probably didn’t put much effort in seeking it out. They defaulted into perception and reputation.
 
The second point, the idea that defense is a "constant", is something I remember hearing a very long time ago. With hitting and pitching, I would say that there is a general feeling that those could fluctuate significantly, and, again, because we had good statistics for measuring performance, a lot of that was visible and well-known if someone was having an off-year. But I think there was a prevailing opinion among many that defensive prowess was much more constant, more reliable. The general thought was, if you were a great fielder, you were always a great fielder, at least until you visibly slowed down.
 
Well, as you can probably tell from my tone, I think that’s hogwash. I probably believed it at some time when I was younger, but I stopped believing it a long time ago. I think defensive performance is not a "constant". A great defensive player can have ordinary or even poor years. 
 
And the idea that even someone as brilliant as Brooks Robinson was the best defensive player at his position for 16 straight seasons? I’m not buying it. Can you think of an athlete who was the very best at a particular aspect of his sport for 16 straight years? Even if we’re talking about a narrowly defined, specific area like "best defensive third baseman in the American League", well, that just seems far-fetched to me.
 
The Human Vacuum Cleaner
 
The rest of the article will focus on Brooks Robinson, as he is my "test case", so to speak, for this approach. Now, I need to preface this with the fact that I am not disrespecting Robinson in any way. To the contrary, I think he is clearly the greatest defensive third baseman of all time. In fact, I think he has an argument as the greatest defensive player of all time, regardless of position. 
 
I think there are 3 players with a solid argument as the greatest defenders in MLB history, taking into account both stats and reputation, and those are Brooks Robinson, Ozzie Smith, and Willie Mays. Maybe Roberto Clemente as well, but I think it’s one of those first three. 
 
As a quick sidebar, this seems like a good time to give you my all-time defensive selections (leaving pitchers out of it) based on a combination of stats, awards, and reputation. I did First/Second/Third Team (Gold/Silver/Bronze), but since those are heavily represented with players from the last 60 years or so, I also came up with "Early 1900’s" (essentially 1900-1940, roughly), "Old-Timer" (meaning they were entirely or mostly in the years pre-1900), and "Recent Vintage" (players either active or very recently retired, and not already selected on another team).
 
Pos
Gold
Silver
Bronze
Early 1900's
Old-Timer
Recent Vintage
C
Johnny Bench
Ivan Rodriguez
Yadier Molina
Ray Schalk
Charlie Bennett
Salvador Perez
1B
Keith Hernandez
Vic Power
George Scott
Fred Tenney
Roger Connor
Anthony Rizzo
2B
Bill Mazeroski
Frank White
Joe Gordon
Frankie Frisch
Bid McPhee
DJ Lemahieu
3B
Brooks Robinson
Buddy Bell
Adrian Beltre
Lee Tannehill
Jimmy Collins
Nolan Arenado
SS
Ozzie Smith
Mark Belanger
Luis Aparico
Honus Wagner
Bill Dahlen
Andrelton Simmons
LF
Carl Yastrzemski
Barry Bonds
Alex Gordon
George Burns
Fred Clarke
Brett Gardner
CF
Willie Mays
Andruw Jones
Paul Blair
Tris Speaker
Curt Welch
Kevin Kiermaier
RF
Roberto Clemente
Al Kaline
Jesse Barfield
Harry Hooper
Pop Corkhill
Mookie Betts
 
I probably missed one or two or ten of your favorites, and some of the player designations could easily overlap into a different group, but that’s what I’m going with.
 
In any case, I think Robinson, by any measure, is one of the all-time great defenders.  He clearly deserved a high number of Gold Gloves. 
 
But 16 in a row?
 
So, I decided to take a look and ask myself: how many did he deserve? Who would I have selected in the annual AL third base Gold Glove votes?
 
Approach
 
Here’s what I decided to do. Starting with the first Gold Glove award (1957, which was a combined Major League award rather than each league), I went back and reviewed the third base candidates based on the evidence, and determined who I thought would win if voters considered information that would be available today.
 
Now, this "retroactive" type of honor is not new to members on our site. I’ve talked before about our late friend and BJOL member Bob Gregory, who created our annual BJOL tradition known as the Gallery of Renown. Bob was also fond of heading up other member-participation efforts, including what he called "Retroactive Honors", which, as I recall, was conducted about a decade or so ago. The ideas behind these projects were to revisit annual awards, like MVP and Cy Young, and have our members vote on them anew, but armed with information we have now. And not just revisiting seasons that actually had those awards, but also conducting them for seasons prior to those awards being in existence. 
 
I’m of two minds on this type of endeavor. One, awards represent a time and place, and it’s up to the voters of that time and place to vote honestly to the best of their abilities and with the best evidence they have available, and to honor deserving winners. I generally respect the decisions of prior generations of voters, whether it be for MVP, for Cy Young, or the Hall of Fame. Voters do the best with what is available. And besides, awards are not going to be re-assigned based on new information no matter what we suggest.   They’re locked in.   They’re done.
 
On the other hand…. it can be a fun and informative exercise to think about what might have been, especially given the fact that so many Gold Glove awards in particular clearly were not the result of serious contemplation, but rather the result of habit. So, I’m proceeding with that thought in mind, and I’m borrowing Bob’s phrase and applying it here to create what I’m calling "Retroactive Gold Gloves" or "RAGG" for short.
 
To help me with this, I leveraged the year-by-year "American League Third Base Fielding" pages on baseball-reference.com. Below is the data for the top third base contenders in the American League in 1957.  I removed a few of the available columns to simplify it, but kept most of the data.
 
For each season, I placed a minimum of 700 innings played at third base (that’s a little less than 5 innings per scheduled game) just as a starting point to qualify. Players are sorted descending by innings played at third base since it was easier to just copy and paste the qualifiers that way.
 
1957 American League Third Base Qualifying Candidates:
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Frank Malzone
27
BOS
153
1,364
546
151
370
25
31
.954
10
3.44
3.41
Eddie Yost
30
WSH
107
937
332
109
207
16
18
.952
-11
3.04
2.95
Hector Lopez
27
KCA
111
877
367
117
227
23
20
.937
5
3.53
3.10
Bubba Phillips
29
CHW
97
799
332
91
227
14
18
.958
11
3.58
3.28
Al Smith
29
CLE
84
724
275
95
156
24
16
.913
-10
3.12
2.90
 
You probably know what most of the headings are, but just to spell it out, we have, from left to right, the "basic ones":
 
Name
Age
Team
Games Played
Innings Played in the Field at that Position
Chances (putouts+assists+errors)
Putouts
Assists
Errors
Double Plays
Fielding Percentage
 
Then the rest:
 
Rtot - Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg
The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.
 
RF/9 - Range Factor per 9 Innings
9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played
 
RF/G - Range Factor per Game
Putouts + Assists) / Games Played
 
As you can see by the 1957 example, in some years there are very few candidates, especially in years where there were only 8 AL teams. Only 5 third basemen met my minimum innings requirement that year. In most years, we’ll see more than that.
 
Who do I think would have been voted as the best defensive third baseman in 1957? Well, my basic approach to the annual reviews is that I am going to heavily rely on Total Zone Runs (Rtot). Now, I don’t know whether you’ve used it much, but it generally seems like a reasonable figure to go by. Based on what I’ve seen it’s similar to (but not exactly like) Rfield, which is the fielding component of WAR, and, as I understand it, it’s basically the estimated number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made, and it’s not position adjusted. 
 
Both measures produce similar lists. Below are the top 10 third basemen as measured by career Rfield and career Total Zone Runs:
Player
Rfield (3B)
Player
Total Zone Runs (3B)
Brooks Robinson
293
Brooks Robinson
293
Adrián Beltré
216
Adrián Beltré
168
Scott Rolen
175
Buddy Bell
167
Buddy Bell
174
Clete Boyer
163
Clete Boyer
159
Robin Ventura
154
Nolan Arenado
157
Scott Rolen
140
Robin Ventura
155
Graig Nettles
134
Graig Nettles
140
Gary Gaetti
132
Gary Gaetti
131
Mike Schmidt
129
Mike Schmidt
127
Evan Longoria
120
 
It’s basically the same top 10 except the order and the figures are a little different, with the only difference in players being that Arenado makes the Rfield list but just misses the Total Zone Runs list (he’s 11th with 101, and will probably crack the top 10 before he’s done), while Longoria makes the Total Zone Runs list at #10, but doesn’t quite make the Rfield list (he’s #16).
 
Most of the values are pretty similar – Robinson’s is exactly the same using either value, and Bell, Boyer, Ventura, Nettles, Gaetti, and Schmidt are almost the same regardless of which method is used. 
 
I guess what I’m leading up to is that, if you were looking to identify the top 10 defensive third basement of all time, I think you could do worse that Total Zone Runs. That’s a pretty reasonable top 10 in my book. I’m comfortable that it’ll do a fairly good job of helping us recognize quality defensive performance when assessing individual seasons. Also, it’s on the annual fielding data page, so it’s nice and handy.
 
However, although I’ll rely heavily on it, I’m not going strictly by it. Generally speaking, I’m going to look first at Total Zone Runs (Rtot), but I’m going to look at performance in other areas as well, and make a judgement call. I’ll shade the Total Zone Runs column in gray to make it stand out.
 
Circling back to 1957, here’s that table again:
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Frank Malzone
27
BOS
153
1,364
546
151
370
25
31
.954
10
3.44
3.41
Eddie Yost
30
WSH
107
937
332
109
207
16
18
.952
-11
3.04
2.95
Hector Lopez
27
KCA
111
877
367
117
227
23
20
.937
5
3.53
3.10
Bubba Phillips
29
CHW
97
799
332
91
227
14
18
.958
11
3.58
3.28
Al Smith
29
CLE
84
724
275
95
156
24
16
.913
-10
3.12
2.90
 
Bubba Phillips and Frank Malzone were neck and neck with Total Zone Runs of 11 and 10, respectively, and given that Phillips played a lot less at third (he also played several games in the outfield), in some respect his defensive performance was more impressive. However, I think Phillips wouldn’t appear to enough voters as a "true" third baseman. Malzone led by a large margin in all the bulk categories (innings, putouts, assists, etc.), and I think he would have won the RAGG award, as indeed he did win in the actual Gold Glove voting. 
 
By the way, since 1957 was a combined Gold Glove, National Leaguers were eligible too, but there really weren’t any strong contenders (the only qualifying candidates were Eddie Mathews of the Braves, Don Hoak of Cincinnati, Willie Jones of Philadelphia, and Eddie Kasko of Cincinnati, and none of them would have been a better option than Malzone).
 
Anyway, that’s an example of how this will work.
 
Annual Review
 
Below is a grid that I’ll fill in with my "retroactive" winners as we go, and I’ll periodically display the running updates. I populated the "Gold Glove" column with the winners from 1957 (the first year of the Gold Glove) through 1977, Brooks Robinson’s final year. 
 
*1 award was given for the Major Leagues in 1957
 
Year
Gold Glove (GG)
Retroactive Gold Glove (RAGG)
*1957
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1958
Frank Malzone
-
1959
Frank Malzone
-
1960
Brooks Robinson
-
1961
Brooks Robinson
-
1962
Brooks Robinson
-
1963
Brooks Robinson
-
1964
Brooks Robinson
-
1965
Brooks Robinson
-
1966
Brooks Robinson
-
1967
Brooks Robinson
-
1968
Brooks Robinson
-
1969
Brooks Robinson
-
1970
Brooks Robinson
-
1971
Brooks Robinson
-
1972
Brooks Robinson
-
1973
Brooks Robinson
-
1974
Brooks Robinson
-
1975
Brooks Robinson
-
1976
Aurelio Rodriguez
-
1977
Graig Nettles
-
 
I’ll pick up with 1958, and for each year I’ll provide a "setup" of the American League third base field just to set the stage, and then present the data for the qualifying contenders, then some analysis/conclusions.
 
1958
 
Setup
Robinson takes over as Baltimore’s full-time starter at 3B as George Kell retires. Malzone is elected to the All Star team and is the only primary third baseman on the roster.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders

Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Frank Malzone
28
BOS
 155
 1,380
 544
 139
 378
 27
 36
.950
10
 3.37
 3.34
Brooks Robinson
21
BAL
 140
 1,119
 447
 151
 275
 21
 30
.953
7
 3.43
 3.04
Eddie Yost
31
WSH
 114
     942
 306
 109
 186
 11
 20
.964
-5
 2.82
 2.59
Billy Goodman
32
CHW
 111
     855
 284
    67
 204
 13
 16
.954
1
 2.85
 2.44
Andy Carey
26
NYY
    99
     794
 306
    99
 195
 12
 22
.961
5
 3.33
 2.97

Analysis
Total Zone Runs are close, as Robinson has a solid season with the glove, but Malzone looks a little better overall, so I think in this case I’d have to vote for him. He’s 2-for-2:
 
1959
 
Setup
From 1959-1962, two All Star Games are played each season. Harmon Killebrew is elected as the AL third baseman, and Malzone makes the team as well. They are the only 2 primary third basemen who made the team(s) that year.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Frank Malzone
29
BOS
154
1,364
515
134
357
24
40
.953
1
3.24
3.19
Harmon Killebrew
23
WSH
150
1,319
484
129
325
30
18
.938
-8
3.10
3.03
Eddie Yost
32
DET
146
1,267
444
168
259
17
21
.962
1
3.03
2.92
Bubba Phillips
31
CHW
100
791
307
90
202
15
13
.951
6
3.32
2.92
Brooks Robinson
22
BAL
87
723
292
92
187
13
25
.955
13
3.47
3.21
 
Analysis
 
Malzone slips a little defensively but starts and plays every game. Robinson has the clear Total Zone Runs advantage, but barely qualifies for my threshold with 723 innings as he played the first couple of months in the minors (Baltimore sent him there to start off the season after his mediocre offensive showing in 1958). 
 
This one’s a bit of a tough call. Do you go with the 2-time defending winner in Malzone who played a full year, or the young gun Robinson who was likely better defensively but only got in a little more than half the season?
 
I’m going to go with Robinson despite not playing a full season, and the legend begins, as he actually wins one retroactively in a year in which he didn’t win in real life. We have our first "disagreement", and I’ll highlight those in yellow:
 
Year
Gold Glove (GG)
Retroactive Gold Glove (RAGG)
*1957
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1958
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1959
Frank Malzone
Brooks Robinson
 
1960
 
Setup
Clete Boyer emerges as the primary third baseman for the Yankees, although he also plays a fair amount of shortstop (33 games). Andy Carey is traded from the Yankees to the Athletics for Bob Cerv, and he becomes KC’s primary third baseman.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Brooks Robinson
23
BAL
152
1,354
511
171
328
12
34
.977
17
3.32
3.28
Frank Malzone
30
BOS
151
1,326
503
159
318
26
36
.948
-3
3.24
3.16
Eddie Yost
33
DET
142
1,181
389
155
208
26
18
.933
-17
2.77
2.56
Gene Freese
26
CHW
122
1,043
371
88
263
20
29
.946
5
3.03
2.88
Reno Bertoia
25
WSH
112
960
334
94
227
13
19
.961
0
3.01
2.87
Clete Boyer
23
NYY
99
782
332
102
219
11
24
.967
15
3.69
3.24
Andy Carey
28
KCA
93
780
282
95
180
7
26
.975
1
3.17
2.96
 
Analysis
We have a relatively deep field in that 7 of the 8 teams have a qualifying third baseman. In what will be the first of many head-to-head battles between two of the greatest defensive third basemen ever, Robinson and Boyer duke it out. Robinson has a slight edge in Total Zone Runs (17 to 15), but also played 53 more games. Boyer’s stats are more impressive relative to playing time, but I suspect that Boyer’s time at shortstop, even though that in itself implies a strong defensive ability, would probably work against him in the voting. I think Robinson would probably get the nod here, which is the same result as the actual Gold Glove voting.
 
1961
 
Setup
The AL expands from 8 to 10 teams, adding the Los Angeles Angels and the "new" Washington Senators, with the old one relocating to Minnesota. Steve Boros takes over at 3B for Detroit.   Robinson is the fan’s choice as the AL starter, with Killebrew as the backup.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Brooks Robinson
24
BAL
163
1,459
496
151
331
14
34
.972
15
2.97
2.96
Frank Malzone
31
BOS
149
1,312
463
136
304
23
45
.950
3
3.02
2.95
Bubba Phillips
33
CLE
143
1,273
453
188
246
19
23
.958
-6
3.07
3.03
Clete Boyer
24
NYY
141
1,200
521
151
353
17
36
.967
30
3.78
3.57
Steve Boros
24
DET
116
1,007
322
115
192
15
15
.953
-5
2.74
2.65
 
Analysis
Despite expanding to 10 teams, it’s a fairly small qualifying field with only 5 players, although all 5 exceed 1,000 innings. Robinson had an impressive defensive season, but Boyer blows away the field with a monster Total Zone Runs figure of 30, the highest by a third basemen to that point in time. Even though the metric only applies to 1953 or later, it’s a staggering figure. He’s a runaway winner, and we have our second disagreement:
 
Year
Gold Glove (GG)
Retroactive Gold Glove (RAGG)
*1957
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1958
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1959
Frank Malzone
Brooks Robinson
1960
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1961
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
 
1962
 
Setup
Stability reigns as 9 different players end up exceeding 800 innings on the year. Rich Rollins takes over for the Twins, and Ed Charles takes over for the A’s. Rollins nabs the fan vote as the AL starter, with Robinson as the backup.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Brooks Robinson
25
BAL
162
1,445
513
163
339
11
32
.979
18
3.13
3.10
Rich Rollins
24
MIN
159
1,415
489
137
324
28
33
.943
0
2.93
2.90
Clete Boyer
25
NYY
157
1,397
605
187
396
22
41
.964
28
3.76
3.71
Frank Malzone
32
BOS
156
1,389
483
154
313
16
32
.967
8
3.03
2.99
Bubba Phillips
34
CLE
145
1,272
428
175
243
10
16
.977
2
2.96
2.88
Ed Charles
29
KCA
140
1,201
446
145
285
16
27
.964
7
3.22
3.07
Felix Torres
30
LAA
123
1,038
384
110
250
24
20
.938
-2
3.12
2.93
Al Smith
34
CHW
105
849
279
76
185
18
8
.935
-3
2.77
2.49
Steve Boros
25
DET
105
837
275
105
151
19
15
.931
-12
2.75
2.44
 
Analysis
Similar to 1961, 1962 witnessed another strong performance by Robinson that was bested by Boyer, as he outgunned Robinson by 10 runs and took home his second consecutive retroactive award.
 
1963
Setup
A whopping 9 players exceed 1,000 innings at third base. Newcomers include Max Alvis for Cleveland and Pete Ward for Chicago. Malzone wins the fan vote for the All Star team, with Robinson backing him up.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Max Alvis
25
CLE
158
1,420
483
170
285
28
32
.942
-3
2.88
2.88
Ed Charles
30
KCA
158
1,414
488
153
310
25
19
.949
4
2.95
2.93
Brooks Robinson
26
BAL
160
1,414
495
153
330
12
43
.976
12
3.07
3.02
Pete Ward
25
CHW
154
1,386
496
156
302
38
27
.923
-8
2.97
2.97
Frank Malzone
33
BOS
148
1,324
450
151
283
16
18
.964
6
2.95
2.93
Clete Boyer
26
NYY
141
1,243
497
165
309
23
32
.954
14
3.43
3.36
Rich Rollins
25
MIN
132
1,163
402
121
255
26
22
.935
3
2.91
2.85
Felix Torres
31
LAA
122
1,035
360
101
237
22
29
.939
5
2.94
2.77
Bubba Phillips
35
DET
117
1,014
356
116
226
14
26
.961
-1
3.03
2.92
 
Analysis
Yet another 2-way battle between Robinson and Boyer, but this one’s a lot closer. Robinson played a little more often and committed a lot fewer errors, but in the end I’m giving Boyer the slight edge for his third straight award.
 
Year
Gold Glove (GG)
Retroactive Gold Glove (RAGG)
*1957
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1958
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1959
Frank Malzone
Brooks Robinson
1960
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1961
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1962
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1963
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
 
1964
Setup
Don Wert takes over at third base for the Tigers, John Kennedy for the Senators, and Billy Moran splits time with the Angels and Indians. Robinson takes the fan vote for the All Star team, with Malzone backing him up.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders

Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Brooks Robinson
27
BAL
163
1,454
494
153
327
14
40
.972
17
2.97
2.94
Rich Rollins
26
MIN
146
1,302
455
134
297
24
17
.947
4
2.98
2.95
Ed Charles
31
KCA
147
1,293
416
138
259
19
25
.954
-11
2.76
2.70
Don Wert
25
DET
142
1,227
424
126
283
15
30
.965
10
3.00
2.88
Pete Ward
26
CHW
138
1,225
454
126
309
19
24
.958
18
3.19
3.15
Frank Malzone
34
BOS
143
1,225
417
141
259
17
24
.959
0
2.94
2.80
Clete Boyer
27
NYY
123
1,076
409
118
278
13
28
.968
15
3.31
3.22
Max Alvis
26
CLE
105
912
287
83
191
13
18
.955
-8
2.70
2.61
John Kennedy
23
WSA
106
758
306
97
191
18
14
.941
3
3.42
2.72
Billy Moran
30
TOT
89
742
247
81
153
13
9
.947
-4
2.84
2.60
 
Analysis
Several good Total Zone Runs performances – Ward leads with 18, followed closely by Robinson with 17, Boyer with 15, and Wert with 10. Any one of the top 3 could have won it, but Robinson played every game and led all the bulk categories, plus this was Robinson’s MVP season (Ward finished a strong 6th). I have to believe Robinson would have won, and he thus breaks Boyer’s three-year run.
 
1965
 
Setup
A lot of the same names, but Ken McMullen emerges as the regular for the Senators, and Paul Schaal takes over for the Angels. Robinson wins the fan vote for the All Star team, with Alvis as the backup.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Don Wert
26
DET
161
1,427
506
163
331
12
33
.976
9
3.11
3.07
Max Alvis
27
CLE
156
1,396
452
169
264
19
17
.958
-6
2.79
2.78
Paul Schaal
22
CAL
153
1,309
435
101
321
13
20
.970
4
2.90
2.76
Brooks Robinson
28
BAL
143
1,298
455
144
296
15
36
.967
8
3.05
3.08
Clete Boyer
28
NYY
147
1,274
504
134
354
16
46
.968
8
3.45
3.32
Ken McMullen
23
WSA
142
1,203
476
155
299
22
29
.954
9
3.40
3.20
Pete Ward
27
CHW
134
1,166
437
97
319
21
22
.952
8
3.21
3.10
Ed Charles
32
KCA
128
1,108
413
150
251
12
28
.971
5
3.26
3.13
Rich Rollins
27
MIN
112
952
356
112
229
15
21
.958
9
3.22
3.04
 
Analysis
Total Zone Runs are as tight as can be, with Wert, Rollins, and McMullen all tallying 9 and Robinson, Boyer, and Ward coming in at 8, and even Charles and Schaal post positive numbers.
 
What to do? Lots of players have reasonable cases. It’s a bit of a free-for-all, and I’m tempted to go with Wert who was pretty solid across the board, but I think Boyer gets the nod by leading in assists, double plays, and range factor.
 
1966
 
Setup

Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
10 players qualify. Joe Foy takes over for Boston, Don Buford shifts over from second base to third base for the White Sox, and Killebrew logs his highest number of games at third base since 1959. Robinson wins the fan vote, and Killebrew makes the All Star team as a backup.
 
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Brooks Robinson
29
BAL
157
1,431
499
174
313
12
26
.976
4
3.06
3.10
Max Alvis
28
CLE
157
1,418
480
180
280
20
24
.958
-3
2.92
2.93
Don Wert
27
DET
150
1,326
392
128
253
11
20
.972
-13
2.59
2.54
Joe Foy
23
BOS
139
1,244
450
150
279
21
28
.953
5
3.10
3.09
Ken McMullen
24
WSA
141
1,167
426
125
280
21
26
.951
7
3.12
2.87
Don Buford
29
CHW
133
1,096
425
98
301
26
24
.939
13
3.27
3.00
Paul Schaal
23
CAL
131
1,018
365
97
249
19
21
.948
-3
3.06
2.64
Harmon Killebrew
30
MIN
107
915
287
83
190
14
11
.951
-3
2.69
2.55
Ed Charles
33
KCA
104
882
297
85
201
11
21
.963
10
2.92
2.75
Clete Boyer
29
NYY
85
741
324
87
226
11
12
.966
11
3.80
3.68
 
Analysis
Another pretty tight race in the Total Zone Runs category, although Robinson has an off-year. Buford, who had been the primary second baseman for the White Sox the year before, leads the league with 13 Total Zone Runs, although it’s a close call over Boyer with 11 and Charles with 10.
 
Boyer had impressive per game stats (his Range Factor is very high), but he played a lot of shortstop as the Yankees tried to replace Tony Kubek, who had retired in January of that year. They tried a mix of Boyer, Horace Clarke, Bobby Murcer (who came up as a shortstop), Ruben Amaro, and Dick Schofield
 
Not sure how the voting might shake out. Boyer played 59 games at shortstop, and, similar to 1960, I think that might discourage the voters. Buford had the highest Total Zone Runs figure, but not by a lot, and he made more errors (and had the lowest fielding percentage) of any of the candidates.
 
Something tells me that Robinson, despite not having one of his better Total Zone Run figures would be the voters’ choice, tying him with Boyer (for the moment) at 4 awards each. But I’m not real confident of it, and this might have been a good year for someone else like Buford or McMullen or Foy to get some recognition.
 
After 10 seasons, here’s the updated tally, with 5 seasons holding to form, and 5 having different projected winners:
 
Year
Gold Glove (GG)
Retroactive Gold Glove (RAGG)
*1957
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1958
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1959
Frank Malzone
Brooks Robinson
1960
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1961
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1962
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1963
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1964
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1965
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1966
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
 
1967
 
Setup
Mostly the same candidates as the year before, with Charley Smith taking over for Clete Boyer in New York as Boyer was traded to Atlanta. Robinson again wins the fan vote, and Alvis makes another All Star team as a backup.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Max Alvis
29
CLE
161
1,450
490
169
304
17
20
.965
-3
2.94
2.94
Brooks Robinson
30
BAL
158
1,413
563
147
405
11
37
.980
32
3.52
3.49
Ken McMullen
25
WSA
145
1,312
519
153
348
18
38
.965
17
3.44
3.46
Don Wert
28
DET
140
1,193
401
112
280
9
21
.978
7
2.96
2.80
Joe Foy
24
BOS
118
988
340
109
204
27
13
.921
-10
2.85
2.65
Charley Smith
29
NYY
115
982
396
92
283
21
22
.947
5
3.44
3.26
Don Buford
30
CHW
121
918
364
95
250
19
16
.948
7
3.38
2.85
Rich Rollins
29
MIN
97
729
245
83
153
9
13
.963
-10
2.91
2.43
 
Analysis
McMullen has a nice performance, but Robinson dominates the field with a sizzling figure of 32 Total Zone Runs, the highest by a third baseman to date. His other data is strong too, with over 400 assists and only 11 errors. He’s a runaway winner.
 
1968
 
Setup
Bobby Cox (yes, that one) takes over for Charley Smith in New York. Robinson is once again the fan’s choice, and Don Wert makes the team as the backup.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Brooks Robinson
31
BAL
162
1,435
537
168
353
16
31
.970
33
3.27
3.22
Sal Bando
24
OAK
162
1,414
477
188
272
17
27
.964
-1
2.93
2.84
Don Wert
29
DET
150
1,340
441
142
284
15
22
.966
7
2.86
2.84
Joe Foy
25
BOS
147
1,286
459
116
313
30
36
.935
2
3.00
2.92
Ken McMullen
26
WSA
145
1,255
500
185
296
19
26
.962
0
3.45
3.32
Bobby Cox
27
NYY
132
1,145
394
98
279
17
22
.957
0
2.96
2.86
Max Alvis
30
CLE
128
1,104
329
114
202
13
18
.960
0
2.58
2.00
 
Analysis
Second verse, same as the first. Robinson bests 1967 by a run by posting a total of 33 Total Zone Runs, the highest to that point. It will stand for 30 years, with Robin Ventura tying it in 1998, and Manny Machado upping it to 34 in 2013.
 
No need to look further. Robinson takes the award again, his third straight RAGG, 4th in 5 years, and 6th in his career.
 
Year
Gold Glove (GG)
Retroactive Gold Glove (RAGG)
*1957
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1958
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1959
Frank Malzone
Brooks Robinson
1960
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1961
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1962
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1963
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1964
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1965
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1966
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1967
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1968
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
 
1969
 
Setup
Expansion adds 2 more teams to both leagues, with the American League adding the Seattle Pilots and the Kansas City Royals. The vowel man (21-year old Aurelio Rodriguez) emerges as the primary third baseman for the Angels, and 23-year old Bill Melton takes over hot corner duty for the White Sox. George Scott, who was a Gold Glove winner at first base the 2 previous seasons, moves across the diamond for the Red Sox, as Joe Foy moves from Boston to Kansas City to play 3B for the expansion Royals. For the first time since 1963, Robinson does not win the All Star game fan vote, as Bando takes the honors, with Robinson as the backup.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Sal Bando
25
OAK
162
1,480
523
178
321
24
36
.954
2
3.03
3.08
Brooks Robinson
32
BAL
156
1,392
546
163
370
13
37
.976
23
3.44
3.42
Aurelio Rodriguez
21
CAL
159
1,372
521
145
352
24
42
.954
8
3.26
3.13
Ken McMullen
27
WSA
154
1,331
545
185
347
13
35
.976
16
3.60
3.45
Bill Melton
23
CHW
148
1,236
456
112
322
22
36
.952
-11
3.16
2.93
Don Wert
30
DET
129
1,092
386
114
259
13
20
.966
5
3.07
2.89
Joe Foy
26
KCR
113
968
338
117
209
12
20
.964
-4
3.03
2.88
George Scott
25
BOS
109
934
324
106
203
15
29
.954
1
2.98
2.83
Harmon Killebrew
33
MIN
105
778
280
75
185
20
12
.929
-12
3.01
2.48
 
Analysis
McMullen has a terrific season defensively for the Senators, and Rodriguez shows his stuff for the Angels, but it’s another stellar performance for Robinson. He takes his 4th RAGG in a row.
 
1970
 
Setup
Seattle moves to Milwaukee and becomes the Brewers. Jerry Kenney takes over primary third base duties for the Yankees, the Paul Schaal era begins in Kansas City, and Rodriguez and McMullen trade teams (Rodriguez to the Senators and McMullen to the Angels). Graig Nettles is traded from Minnesota to Cleveland (in a trade that also included past and future star pitcher Luis Tiant) and becomes a force to be reckoned with at third base. Killebrew, fresh off his 1969 MVP, plays mostly at 3B in 1970 and again has a strong season, finishing 3rd in the MVP voting. He wins the fan vote for the All Star game, with Robinson and Tommy Harper (who finished 6th in the MVP voting while posting a 30 HR/30 SB season)
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Brooks Robinson
33
BAL
156
1,389
495
157
321
17
30
.966
5
3.10
3.06
Aurelio Rodriguez
22
WSA
153
1,374
513
118
377
18
41
.965
27
3.24
3.24
Sal Bando
26
OAK
152
1,327
436
158
258
20
22
.954
4
2.82
2.74
Graig Nettles
25
CLE
154
1,313
509
134
358
17
40
.967
21
3.37
3.19
Ken McMullen
28
CAL
137
1,200
479
154
306
19
39
.960
12
3.45
3.36
Tommy Harper
29
MIL
128
1,094
422
123
275
24
23
.943
7
3.27
3.11
Harmon Killebrew
34
MIN
138
1,075
328
108
203
17
14
.948
-9
2.60
2.25
Jerry Kenney
25
NYY
135
1,031
428
111
300
17
18
.960
10
3.59
3.04
Don Wert
31
DET
117
915
299
94
191
14
20
.953
-12
2.80
2.44
Paul Schaal
27
KCR
97
782
243
69
159
15
12
.938
-3
2.62
2.30
 
Analysis
Robinson has a bit of a down year (at least according to Total Zone Runs) while young guns Rodriguez and Nettles post impressive defensive seasons, both in the upper 300’s ion assists and both reaching 40 double plays turned. It’s close, but Rodriguez gets the nod to earn his first RAGG, breaking Robinson’s 4-year run.
 
Of course, Robinson does get a bit of a last laugh, as he puts on one of the most iconic World Series performances in history, including several jaw-dropping displays of defensive wizardry. My young, Red Machine heart was crushed.
 
Year
Gold Glove (GG)
Retroactive Gold Glove (RAGG)
*1957
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1958
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1959
Frank Malzone
Brooks Robinson
1960
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1961
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1962
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1963
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1964
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1965
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1966
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1967
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1968
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1969
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1970
Brooks Robinson
Aurelio Rodriguez
 
1971
 
Setup
Rico Petrocelli moves over from shortstop to third base for the Red Sox. Rodriguez moves from the Senators to the Tigers in a big trade (Ed Brinkman, Joe Coleman and Jim Hannan to the Tigers for Elliott Maddox, Denny McLain, Norm McRae and Don Wert). Dave Nelson takes over at third base in Washington. Robinson is back in the fan’s good graces and wins the All Star voting, with Melton making the team as a backup.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Ken McMullen
29
CAL
158
1,428
498
137
344
17
27
.966
6
3.03
3.04
Paul Schaal
28
KCR
161
1,407
470
107
335
28
31
.940
-8
2.83
2.75
Graig Nettles
26
CLE
158
1,403
587
159
412
16
54
.973
30
3.66
3.61
Rico Petrocelli
28
BOS
156
1,386
463
118
334
11
37
.976
3
2.94
2.90
Brooks Robinson
34
BAL
156
1,371
501
131
354
16
35
.968
21
3.18
3.11
Sal Bando
27
OAK
153
1,368
420
141
267
12
22
.971
7
2.68
2.67
Aurelio Rodriguez
23
DET
153
1,322
491
127
341
23
33
.953
5
3.19
3.06
Bill Melton
25
CHW
148
1,270
503
116
371
16
26
.968
7
3.45
3.29
Jerry Kenney
26
NYY
109
818
321
69
237
15
20
.953
12
3.37
2.81
Dave Nelson
27
WSA
84
714
226
63
149
14
15
.938
-6
2.67
2.52
 
Analysis
Once again, an AL third baseman posts a Total Zone Runs figure of 30 or more, only this time it’s Nettles’ turn. Robinson posts a 21 figure that would be good enough to lead in most years, but Nettles’ 30 (not to mention more than 400 assists and an impressive 54 double plays) takes the prize.
1972
 
Setup
Washington moves to Texas and becomes the Rangers. Mike Ferraro takes over primary third base duties for the Brewers, but otherwise the top candidates are pretty stable. Robinson again wins the fan vote, with Bando making the team as a backup.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Graig Nettles
27
CLE
150
1,351
473
114
338
21
27
.956
9
3.01
3.01
Sal Bando
28
OAK
151
1,344
479
123
337
19
29
.960
11
3.08
3.05
Aurelio Rodriguez
24
DET
153
1,334
514
150
348
16
33
.969
12
3.36
3.25
Brooks Robinson
35
BAL
152
1,323
473
129
333
11
27
.977
18
3.14
3.04
Rico Petrocelli
29
BOS
146
1,273
437
146
278
13
38
.970
-2
3.00
2.90
Ken McMullen
30
CAL
137
1,149
367
89
267
11
26
.970
4
2.79
2.60
Paul Schaal
29
KCR
123
1,078
340
77
245
18
16
.947
-4
2.69
2.62
Dave Nelson
28
TEX
119
1,005
348
107
222
19
25
.945
-5
2.94
2.76
Mike Ferraro
27
MIL
115
911
281
93
174
14
16
.950
-5
2.64
2.32
 
Analysis
Robinson is getting up there at age 35, but he has a nice bounce-back year defensively. Rodriguez, Bando, and Nettles all post decent figures, but Robinson gets back in the winner’s circle.
 
Year
Gold Glove (GG)
Retroactive Gold Glove (RAGG)
*1957
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1958
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1959
Frank Malzone
Brooks Robinson
1960
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1961
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1962
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1963
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1964
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1965
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1966
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1967
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1968
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1969
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1970
Brooks Robinson
Aurelio Rodriguez
1971
Brooks Robinson
Graig Nettles
1972
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
 
1973
 
Setup
There’s a whole lot of shaking going on at the hot corner. A whopping 11 players qualify for the innings played threshold. 21-year old Buddy Bell takes over at third base for Cleveland as Nettles moves to the Yankees. Don Money comes over from the National League to start for Milwaukee, while Steve Braun and Al Gallagher qualify for the Twins and the Angels, respectively. Once again, Robinson takes the fan vote and Bando is selected as a backup along with Buddy Bell of Cleveland, who is named to his first All Star team.
 
 
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Aurelio Rodriguez
25
DET
160
1,394
484
135
335
14
30
.971
-1
3.03
2.94
Graig Nettles
28
NYY
157
1,369
553
117
410
26
39
.953
20
3.46
3.36
Buddy Bell
21
CLE
154
1,367
529
144
363
22
44
.958
12
3.34
3.29
Sal Bando
29
OAK
159
1,363
429
126
281
22
24
.949
-7
2.69
2.56
Brooks Robinson
36
BAL
154
1,341
498
129
354
15
25
.970
18
3.24
3.14
Bill Melton
27
CHW
151
1,307
485
115
347
23
31
.953
-4
3.18
3.06
Don Money
26
MIL
124
1,106
346
112
224
10
24
.971
-8
2.73
2.71
Paul Schaal
30
KCR
121
1,027
344
77
237
30
14
.913
-12
2.75
2.60
Steve Braun
25
MIN
102
852
270
79
175
16
21
.941
-8
2.68
2.49
Rico Petrocelli
30
BOS
99
851
303
73
224
6
22
.980
10
3.14
3.00
Al Gallagher
27
CAL
98
771
255
59
186
10
13
.961
-1
2.86
2.50
 
Analysis
Bell, who had debuted in 1972 primarily as a right fielder/center fielder, moved to third base to replace Nettles, and he impressed defensively at third base right off the bat, giving a glimpse into the future success he would display as a multi-year Gold Glove winner for Texas. However, 1973 came down to another Nettles-Robinson duel. Nettles once again posted a 400+ assist total, while Robinson was more sure-handed. With Total Zone Runs being so tight, it came down to personal preference, and I’m giving the slight edge to Nettles.
 
1974
 
Setup
Eric Soderholm takes over as the primary Minnesota third baseman and Lenny Randle handles the bulk of the playing time for Texas, but the big news at the position is the emergence of future Hall of Famer 21-year old George Brett for Kansas City. Robinson is again the fan favorite for the All Star team, with Bando and Money serving as backups
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
Aurelio Rodriguez
26
DET
159
1,390
542
132
389
21
40
.961
7
3.37
3.28
Don Money
27
MIL
157
1,382
472
131
336
5
42
.989
2
3.04
2.97
Graig Nettles
29
NYY
154
1,368
545
147
377
21
29
.961
13
3.45
3.40
Brooks Robinson
37
BAL
153
1,362
543
115
410
18
44
.967
15
3.47
3.43
Sal Bando
30
OAK
141
1,197
423
113
287
23
28
.946
-4
3.01
2.84
George Brett
21
KCR
132
1,134
402
102
279
21
16
.948
-7
3.02
2.89
Eric Soderholm
25
MIN
130
1,113
390
100
273
17
19
.956
1
3.02
2.87
Bill Melton
28
CHW
123
1,079
396
100
272
24
29
.939
-7
3.10
3.02
Buddy Bell
22
CLE
115
1,011
401
112
274
15
31
.963
14
3.44
3.36
Rico Petrocelli
31
BOS
116
975
314
83
219
12
23
.962
0
2.79
2.60
Lenny Randle
25
TEX
89
751
277
92
167
18
23
.935
-3
3.10
2.91
 
Analysis
Same top 3 as 1973, but with Robinson (15), Bell (14), and Nettles (13) all clustered very close together in Total Zone Runs, with Bell managing to be right there with the other two despite only playing 115 games. I think the voters would narrow it down once again to Nettles and Robinson and take a look at the other categories to determine the winner. This time, I think they would give the slight edge to Robinson.
 
1975
 
Setup
All 12 AL teams have a qualifying third baseman. Roy Howell takes the reigns for Texas, while Dave Chalk is the primary third baseman for the Angels. 1975 would be Robinson’s final full time season as Baltimore’s third baseman, and would also be his final Gold Glove award. Robinson’s streak of 15 consecutive All Star seasons comes to an end, as Nettles wins the fan vote and Chalk is named as the backup.
 
Qualifying AL Third Base Contenders
Name
Age
Tm
G
Inn
Ch
PO
A
E
DP
Fld%
Rtot
RF/9
RF/G
George Brett
22
KCR
159
1,423
512
131
355
26
27
.949
7
3.07
3.06
Graig Nettles
30
NYY
157
1,389
533
135
379
19
31
.964
11
3.33
3.27
Sal Bando
31
OAK
160
1,371
451
122
314
15
36
.967
5
2.86
2.73
Buddy Bell
23
CLE
153
1,328
501
146
330
25
29
.950
1
3.23
3.11
Aurelio Rodriguez
27
DET
151
1,302
536
136
375
25
33
.953
7
3.53
3.38
Dave Chalk
24
CAL
149
1,295
452
108
333
11
30
.976
9
3.06
2.96
Brooks Robinson
38
BAL
143
1,223
431
96
326
9
30
.979
19
3.10
2.95
Bill Melton
29
CHW
138
1,190
470
131
313
26
23
.945
-10
3.36
3.22
Eric Soderholm
26
MIN
113
980
383
94
277
12
14
.969
14
3.40
3.28
Rico Petrocelli
32
BOS
113
975
327
85
229
13
13
.960
-3
2.90
2.78
Roy Howell
21
TEX
115
883
315
80
214
21
32
.933
-2
2.99
2.56
Don Money
28
MIL
99
813
288
95
179
14
22
.951
-7
3.03
2.77
 
Analysis
The ageless wonder strikes again. Robinson once again has the highest Total Zone Runs figure with 19, and he’s 5 ahead of Soderholm and 8 ahead of Nettles. Even though the fictional voters in this exercise acknowledge that errors aren’t all that important in the scheme of things, they do admit that Robinson’s 9 errors (a career low for him in a full season), combined with his league-leading Total Zone figure, was enough.
 
In 1976, Doug DeCinces overtook Robinson as the primary third baseman for Baltimore, and Robinson hung up the spikes after 1977. Here, then, is the Retroactive Gold Glove tally.
 
Year
Gold Glove (GG)
Retroactive Gold Glove (RAGG)
*1957
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1958
Frank Malzone
Frank Malzone
1959
Frank Malzone
Brooks Robinson
1960
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1961
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1962
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1963
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1964
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1965
Brooks Robinson
Clete Boyer
1966
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1967
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1968
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1969
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1970
Brooks Robinson
Aurelio Rodriguez
1971
Brooks Robinson
Graig Nettles
1972
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1973
Brooks Robinson
Graig Nettles
1974
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
1975
Brooks Robinson
Brooks Robinson
 
So, over the first 19 seasons of the award, I have 11 agreements and 8 disagreements with the Gold Glove results. I have Robinson winning the award in one season where he didn’t win in real life (1959, where he only got in a little over half a season) and 7 seasons where I have the award going to someone else. He nets out at 10 Retroactive Gold Gloves.
 
Which of course, is still damn impressive, and I think more realistic. It gives at least a little attention to some of the other standout defensive third basemen of that era, with Boyer winning 4 RAGGs, Nettles winning 2 (he would probably also have won in 1976 if we continued the analysis forward), and Rodriguez winning one. These 3 players did win Gold Gloves in real life, but Boyer’s was in the NL (1969 with Atlanta), while Rodriguez and Nettles won in the AL but only after Robinson stopped playing regularly (Rodriguez in 1976 with Detroit, and Nettles in 1977 and 1978 with the Yankees). 
 
Over Robinson’s 17 seasons in which he qualified based on innings played, I awarded him 10 RAGGs. 3 of those I have as clear-cut decisions (1967, 1968, and 1972). In the other 7, I think he was the most logical choice after considering a spectrum of evidence, but there were other contenders who had reasonable cases. I also think there were 4 others (1958, 1963, 1965, and 1973) where Robinson was a reasonable contender but I went with someone else.
 
So, what does that mean? I awarded him 10, but the range was somewhere between 3 and 14. He was a pretty strong contender in most seasons.  If we go with the approach of awarding him 3 for sure and then assume half of the other 11, that would imply maybe the right "expected" number is somewhere around 8 or 9, or maybe 7 if you want to be conservative. I gave him 10.
 
In summary, I think the following things are true:
 
1)      Robinson is the greatest defensive third baseman ever
2)      Being awarded 16 consecutive Gold Gloves was overkill, especially since there were several other deserving candidates as well.
3)      There were many others who played during Robinson’s era who deserved at least occasional recognition for their defensive performances
4)      Somewhere around 7 to 10 Gold Gloves feels a whole lot better to me.
 
Well, that’s it, and I hope you enjoyed taking this stroll. Again, I may try this with other positions and time frames, we’ll see how that goes.
 
Thank you for reading.
 
Dan
 
 
 

COMMENTS (21 Comments, most recent shown first)

MWeddell
Dan wrote:
Based on what I’ve seen [Total Zone Rating (RTot) is] similar to (but not exactly like) Rfield, which is the fielding component of WAR

I would clarify that (except perhaps for a rounding error), the two figures are identical for seasons before 2003, that Rfield was set to be equal to RTot.

Source: https://www.baseball-reference.com/about/war_explained_position.shtml (looking for the second time "Fielding Runs" is used)
1:49 PM May 20th
 
FrankD
Do great fielders get the 'benefit of the doubt' when scorer decides ff a play is an error or a hit? Would the scorer in Baltimore even call an error on Brooksie? I do agree that your choice of range stats is a very good way of estimating fielder impact. I would be hesitant to use number of errors as a tie-breaker, but since there is only one winner of GG or RAGG I guess you have to use something to pick out the 'winner'
1:32 PM May 18th
 
DaveFleming
The standout revelation - for me - is that Brooksie actually took more GG from Boyer than Nettles. I assumed that this project would show that late-career Robinson snatched some hardware from the young usurper Nettles, but he actually stole more gold more from his direct contemporary, Boyer.
9:49 AM May 18th
 
Rox26bez
Great article! Articles like this are the reason I subscribe to BJOL.
8:08 AM May 18th
 
JackKeefe
If you look at clips from the 1970 WS, "the Brooks Robinson series", most of the plays he makes are pretty routine. The only play that has any wow factor to it is the famous play he makes to get Lee May. I think it's one of the most overrated plays ever.

The mark of a truly exceptional fielder is that they make the good plays look easy. Brooksie made that play look way harder than it had to be.

Here's the recap. Lee May, a big right handed slugger, hits a ground ball down the third base line. Robinson fields it as he's running into foul territory and gets off a one-hop throw that just beats the lead-footed May by a step.

The reason it looks so spectacular is that Robinson keeps his feet as he fields the ball so that he's falling away from first as he throws. Every other third baseman I have ever seen make that play will dive for the ball, let gravity stop their forward momentum, then get to their feet and throw out the runner---particularly if it's a slow right-handed slugger like Lee May. Graig Nettles was the master at this. Brooksie made a good play look impossible, which made viewers think it was better than it actually was.
10:00 PM May 17th
 
JackKeefe
If you look at clips from the 1970 WS, "the Brooks Robinson series", most of the plays he makes are pretty routine. The only play that has any wow factor to it is the famous play he makes to get Lee May. I think it's one of the most overrated plays ever.

The mark of a truly exceptional fielder is that they make the good plays look easy. Brooksie made that play look way harder than it had to be.

Here's the recap. Lee May, a big right handed slugger, hits a ground ball down the third base line. Robinson fields it as he's running into foul territory and gets off a one-hop throw that just beats the lead-footed May by a step.

The reason it looks so spectacular is that Robinson keeps his feet as he fields the ball so that he's falling away from first as he throws. Every other third baseman I have ever seen make that play will dive for the ball, let gravity stop their forward momentum, then get to their feet and throw out the runner---particularly if it's a slow right-handed slugger like Lee May. Graig Nettles was the master at this. Brooksie made a good play look impossible, which made viewers think it was better than it actually was.
10:00 PM May 17th
 
DMBBHF
Thanks for all the comments, guys....

Bear and Dave,

I certainly understand your points re: 1963. What struck me about the data, though, was that everyone had range factors in a very tight knot around 2.9 or 3.0. Everyone except Boyer, at 3.4. That jumped out at me. He had quite a bit fewer innings than many of the others, so if you add another 10% or do to bring him up closer to the others, it makes a difference. It's a bit of a bulk vs rate comparison, but it tipped the scales for me.

Thanks
Dan
9:35 PM May 17th
 
bearbyz
Great article, I love stuff like this. The only time I had a slight disagreement was, like Dave 1963. One thing I looked at was double play to error rate. I'm impressed when 3rd basemen pull off a double play.

One thing that surprised me was Don Money in 1974. I remember him making only 5 errors which caused some writers to say he should get the gold glove. However, I didn't know this before he had 42 double plays that year ranking with Brooks and Rodriquez. I still wouldn't have given him the gold glove, but he had a more impressive season than I realized.

7:45 PM May 17th
 
bearbyz
Great article, I love stuff like this. The only time I had a slight disagreement was, like Dave 1963. One thing I looked at was double play to error rate. I'm impressed when 3rd basemen pull off a double play.

One thing that surprised me was Don Money in 1974. I remember him making only 5 errors which caused some writers to say he should get the gold glove. However, I didn't know this before he had 42 double plays that year ranking with Brooks and Rodriquez. I still wouldn't have given him the gold glove, but he had a more impressive season than I realized.

7:45 PM May 17th
 
ventboys
edits to my last post:

1. Last was supposed to be 'lazy'
2. Every time I said "you" I meant "we"

End of editing, because (see 1)
4:44 PM May 17th
 
ventboys
343 (Danny),

Piggy backing on your point, the fact that there are several positions to memorize means we needed more time to get used to the numbers. What I tend to do is the last version -- I check range/9 and compare it to league average -- but what I wish I could do is to just look at the various raw stats and 'feel' what the player was like the way I can with the back of your average baseball card.

I know why it didn't happen: baseball cards have limited space and (to your point) there were too many variables to memorize the same way we memorized the offensive stats. But I still think there's an advantage to be gained by reading the raw stats before you accept what the various published metrics tell you.

It's the difference between listening to American Top 40 and reading the Billboard charts. You might feel like you know all you need to know from the charts, but it's all based on the knowledge, opinion and sorting choices of other people.
4:42 PM May 17th
 
FrankD
very interesting study, thank you. A side question: has anybody ever evaluated the the biases, if any, of individual scorers? Like a park effect but much smaller, maybe there is a tiny scorer effect.
3:05 PM May 17th
 
FrankD
very interesting study, thank you. A side question: has anybody ever evaluated the the biases, if any, of individual scorers? Like a park effect but much smaller, maybe there is a tiny scorer effect.
3:05 PM May 17th
 
DaveFleming
Fun article, Daniel!

I might disagree on the 1963 decision. While Boyer has a slight edge in Total Fielding Runs (14 to 12), Brooksie turned more double plays (43 to 32), made half as many errors (12 to 23) , and was credited with more assists (330 to 309), through a nearly identical number of chances.

Total Fielding Runs is a compelling second-level statistic, but when it's that close, I think the tie should the guy with the better counting stats.

If Win Shares has Pitcher A at 31 Win Shares and Pitcher B at 32 Win Shares, and Pitcher A is 20-3 with a 2.60 ERA, while Pitcher B is 14-13 with a 3.63 ERA...I'm kinda okay giving the trophy to Pitcher A.


2:49 PM May 17th
 
3for3
Vent:

I think the biggest reason we can't read raw stats is you need 9 different standards. A 2.5 Range Factor means great in some positions, terrible in others. Same with Fielding percentage, assists, dp's started etc. Add in era adjustments, park adjustments...
1:34 PM May 17th
 
ventboys
Nice stuff, Dan.

Defensive stats never got the raw treatment that offensive stats got, and I think that might be a big part of why it's so hard to get people to think of them the way they think about offensive stats.

The arguments against raw stats are similar, right?

"Left/right bias!"
"Groundball/flyball bias among the pitchers!"
"DER bias!"
"He was great last year! how can I believe he wasn't great this year?"

And so on. But that's offense too, right?

Offensive stats are subject to left/right bias (platoon splits) and in some cases park bias changes dramatically depending on it (Yankee Stadium, Fenway Park for two examples).

Runs scored and driven are heavily colored by the offensive contexts surrounding the production, right? Hack Wilson ain't driving in 191 in 1968, and Bob Gibson ain't leaving 1.12 behind in 1930. That's extreme, but it's always a factor. Mike Trout and Mickey Mantle, Willie Mays and Barry Bonds, Walter Johnson and Roger Clemens. Raw stats are soaked in all sorts of biases that have nothing to do with the player in question.

Properly rating good players on bad teams was one of Bill's biggest selling points for the Winshares formulas; remember that? Good/'bad team indicators come up, usually in the extreme (Ernie Banks and Dick Allen going down, every Yankee between 1936 and 1964 going up).

Obviously stats go up and down, and even the greatest players don't win the batting title every year unless they are Ty Cobb or Ted Williams, or win the home run title every year unless they are Babe Ruth and the rest of the league is still trying to catch up.

One of the strongest forces in baseball is what I might call the normalization factor. In defense it's so obvious that we tend to overstate it (27 outs, one ball, nine gloves). But the offensive ranges are there, too. A league that hits .280 is a very high-offense league, while a league that hits .240 is a very low offensive league. And while the shapes change, the run totals have a rubber band-ish ability to stay between four and five unless a radical new development knocks things out of kilter. And in those cases, the league immediately steps in and normalizes things back into shape.

That's a lot of breath expended on a small thing, but here's the small thing:

Why not make the raw defensive stats as commonly known as the raw offensive stats? We skipped past range factor (an incredibly important stat) and its components to more advanced metrics like Duncan Hines skipping past the ingredients for a cake from scratch and selling out to Hostess.

The result of that is that dammed few people -- INCLUDING THOSE WHO SHOULD KNOW -- know how to read raw defensive stats as well as they can read offensive stats.

Hence the confusion.
11:38 AM May 17th
 
evanecurb
As an Orioles fan over 60, I am required by law to remind you all that Brooks Robinson's 293 career total zone runs is the highest number ever by anyone at any position. Andruw Jones is second at 259. Belanger is third (241). No wonder Palmer, McNally and Cuellar tried to make all righties pull the ball.

Also, Thanks Dan, for all of your hard work in putting this together. This is one of your best articles.

Brooks is still with us, by the way. He turns 86 tomorrow (5/18). Happy Birthday, Brooksie! Trivia fact: Clete Boyer, Brooks Robinson, and Pete Ward were all born in 1937, within a few months of each other. As Bill mentioned in his Overrated article, Ward made the mistake of signing with the Orioles.
11:24 AM May 17th
 
CharlesSaeger
One thing to add to the analysis is team DER. This could break some marginal cases. For example, the Yankees in 1965 didn't have a good defense, so putting Clete Boyer as the retro Gold Glove winner isn't as strong.
11:05 AM May 17th
 
3for3
1968 8.4 WAR. 2d among position players. Another year with 33 FR, so let's take away 1.5 wins. Still tied for 2d. He finished 17th in the MVP. That's 2 years in a row where Robinson was clearly one of the top players in the league, and the voters just didn't see it.

1969. 4.1 WAR Got 5 points in the voting (23d)

1970 3.9 WAR. Only 5 FR. Give him his standard 17 FR, and he gets into the top 10 in PP WAR. He finished 7th, but the Orioles won 108 games. This looks ok.

1971 6.0 WAR. 6th among position players. Finished 4th. Vida Blue won, although Wilbur Wood had an insane year. Another big year for the Birds

1972. 3.5 WAR, 26th in the MVP

1974. 4.0 WAR 8th among position players; 12th in MVP

Conclusion? I'd have guessed that Robinson was over awarded but I now think that is untrue. He had 2 seasons where the voters were extra kind to him, 1960 and 1966. You can see the narrative behind those votes (breakout year in 60, first pennant in 66).

However, he had 3 years where the voters just plain missed. 1962, he led the league in WAR for PP and was 3d overall, and finished 9th. 1967, where he was 2d in the league, and didn't even make a single ballot. 1968, second in the league, and a mere 17th.
10:44 AM May 17th
 
3for3
I was going to do this for all the awards Bill looked (and for Robinson as well). It looked like too much work, so I am just going to look at his MVP voting. I am going to use WAR, but with some adjustments, and mostly look vs position players. 2 pitchers did win the MVP during the Robinson era (McLain and Blue). I am also going to 'adjust' Robinson's FR for a few years. During his prime, he averaged about 17 FR per season. I am reasonably sure that the voters of the day wouldn't analyze his stats in depth to see he had 4 FR in 1966, and 32 in 1967.I wonder what happened between those 2 years, but echoing what Dan has said, the voters probably just assumed Robinson was great in 1966.

On to the voting. I won't do pretty charts like Dan did, but I will give some key metrics. If I don't mention it, his FR are ~17...

1960. 4.1 WAR 6th among position players. Finished 3d in the MVP. A bit of an overshoot, but this was his first full time year.

1961. 3.5 WAR Not in the top 10 in WAR. 19th in MVP. Getting 4 points is kind of meaningless.

1962 6.1 WAR. Led the league in position player WAR (Aguirre edged him out with 6.2). Finished 3d in MVP. Mantle won the award with 6.0, but missed 39 games. Surprising to give the award to a guy with 377AB. There really was no MVP that year.

1963. 2.8 WAR. No votes

1964 8.1 WAR. Led among position players. Chance had 8.7 WAR. Certainly a reasonable selection.

1965 4.5 WAR. 7th among position players. 3d in voting. Only 8 FR; if we give him his standard 17, he is tied for 3d.

1966.4.6 WAR 10th among position players. 2d in voting. Another off year as seen by FR; he only had 4. Give him another 13, he moves up to 5th. Still an overshoot, but his Orioles did win the pennant.

1967. 7.7 WAR. 2d among position players. No votes. Let me say that again. ZERO votes. Now, the was a year where he had 32 FR. Take off 15, and he drops to 6th. Still, wasn't mentioned on a single ballot.

(To be continued)
10:28 AM May 17th
 
malbuff
Fine article, fun to read, and I hope it will spawn similar comparisons at other positions. But my takeaway is the 54 (!) double plays turned by Graig Nettles in 1971. That's a-- I mean, I don't know what the season DP record for a 3B is, but that's two double plays a week, every week, for the whole season, for a third baseman. That's remarkable.
9:36 AM May 17th
 
 
© 2011 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.