Remember me

The Forgotten Superstar

February 19, 2009
 
Here’s a test: take a piece of paper and write down the ten best non-pitchers in baseball. Go ahead. Take a few seconds. I’ll wait.
 
(waiting…)
 
Got a list? Okay. Now start cutting players. Using their 2008 stats:
                  
-Cross out anyone who has a poor batting average. Lower than .275, say.
 
-Draw a line through anyone who doesn’t hit for power. Less than 25 homers a year.
 
-Same for anyone who can’t draw at least sixty or seventy walks a year.
 
-Cut anyone who can’t steal at least 20 bases a year. And they should be good baserunners: they should be successful stealing at least 75% of the time.
 
-And since defense is important, keep the guys who play important defensive positions. Shortstop, second, center, catcher. I’ll throw you a bone: keep the third-basemen.
 
-While we’re on defense, cross out the guys who play a difficult defensive position poorly. Use whatever metric you want: Fielding Bible +/-, Gold Gloves, etc. If they play an important defensive position badly, they get a line.
 
-How many are good clutch hitters? This site has a great clutch hitting section. Check whoever is left on your list, and see how good they were in clutch situations last year. If they were bad in key situations, cut ‘em.
 
-What else? Health is important. Did your guy play 150 games last year? If not, cut him.
 
-Finally: cut the losers. Drop anyone whose team did poorly. Finished under .500, say.
 
Who’s left from your list? Did anyone make it through?
 
The Most Complete Player in Baseball
 
I asked a few friends to do the above exercise. They gave me names you would expect: A-Rod, Hanley Ramirez, David Wright, Pujols, Sizemore, Matt Holliday, Manny Ramirez, Ryan Braun, Prince Fielder, Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, Joe Mauer, Dustin Pedroia.
 
None of those players pass. Utley didn’t steal enough bases or draw enough walks and was lousy in the clutch. Hanley Ramirez clipped the bar on stolen base %, and is a mediocre defender. A-Rod was lousy in the clutch last year. Wright misses the steals cut-off.
 
It’s a tough test: you have to be a perfect hitter, able to hit for average and power, while getting on-base. On top of that, you have to play an important defensive position and you have to play it well. You have to be fast, and be an efficient base-stealer. You have to stay healthy. And you have to have a good track record as a clutch hitter, as well as a good record of playing with winning teams. You have to do everything, and you have to do it well.
 
It’s a damn hard test. Because it’s hard, you would think that anyone who might pass that test would get a lot of attention. But none of the people I asked named the only player who actually passes those measures.
 
That player is Carlos Beltran. And not only did Beltran pass the test for this year, he has passed that test for his entire career. Consider:
 
- Beltran hits for a good batting average. In 2008 he hit .284, while playing in a pitcher’s park. His career batting average is .281.
 
-He hits for power and draws walks. Last year he hit 28 homeruns and drew 92 walks. He has hit as many as 41 homeruns in a season, and drawn as many as 95 walks.
 
-He plays an important defensive position, and he plays it extremely well. He won the Gold Glove in 2008. In his career he has won three Gold Gloves, and does well in most standard and advanced defensive measures. 
 
-He is a prolific base-stealer. He is also an efficient base-stealer. In fact, he is the most efficient base-stealer of all-time, having stolen 275 bases in 312 attempts (an 88% success rate).
 
-He hits well in the clutch. He was an excellent clutch hitter last year, posting a .333/.390/.528 line. He has been remarkable in playoff baseball: in 22 postseason games, he has a .364/.485/.817 line. His postseason OPS of 1.302 is the best of all-time.
 
He played 161 games last year. In the last ten years he has played in 140 or more games nine times.
 
-And good teams follow him. The Mets have had winning records every year he’s been with them. The Royals were 35-60 (.368) when they traded him in 2004. They went 23-44 (.343) after he left. The Astros had been 48-49 (.495) before he arrived, but with Beltran in center they improved to 44-21 (.677). Most remarkably, Beltran led the 2003 Royals to an 83-win season in 2003, despite hitting between Desi Reliford and Raul Ibanez though most of the year.
 
He does everything extraordinarily well. He is the most complete player in baseball today.
 
The 2008 NL MVP: A Correction
 
Last year, Beltran had a remarkable season. He hit .284 with 27 homeruns. He scored 116 runs and drove in 112 RBI’s. He walked 92 times and hit 40 doubles. He stole 25 bases and was caught just three times. He was one of the two best defensive centerfielders in baseball last year, and was awarded the Gold Glove. He hit .333/.390/.528 in clutch situations and .344/.440/.645 during the September stretch. His team won 89 games. His season was as rich and complete a year as anyone could ever have in baseball, a grand, epic season.
 
And no one noticed. Not a soul.
 
Thirty-two writers voted for the NL MVP. None of them thought Beltran was the best player in the National League. Only three of the writers thought Beltran was one of the top ten players in the league. By the writers’ consensus, he was the 21st best player in the NL last year.
 
Ryan Howard came in second in the MVP vote. Beltran beat him in every single statistical category except homeruns. On top of that, Beltran was a Gold Glove centerfielder, and an elite base-stealer, and Beltran was a better clutch hitter.
 
The same sportswriters cast more votes for Betran’s teammate, Carlos Delgado, than they did for Beltran. Carlos Delgado hit eleven more homeruns than Carlos Beltran, but, once again, Carlos Beltran did everything else better. Beltran had more hits, walks, doubles, triples, steals. He played a more important defensive position, played his position better, and hit better in the clutch.
 
And lest I be accused of favoritism, it’s worth noting that no one in the sabermetric field argued for Beltran, either. I Googled “Carlos Beltran, 2008, MVP” and found a bunch of articles about Carlos Delgado. Rob Neyer argued for Berkman. I went with Pujols. Others went for Wright or Utley or Hanley. No one made any arguments for Beltran as the NL MVP.
 
In retrospect, I should have. Carlos Beltran was the Most Valuable Player in the National League last year. 
 
Collective Blindness
 
How’d we miss him? All of us, I mean: the baseball watchers of America. Carlos Beltran is the modern incarnation of Willie Mays, a guy who excels at every facet of the game, and we aren’t paying a lick of attention to him.
 
Here are his Win Share totals, and where he ranked among all major league players:
 

 
Win Shares
ML Rank
2008
33
3rd
2007
27
17th
2006
38
2nd

 
He’s damned good: one of the best players in the game right now. So start appreciating him.
 
Dave Fleming is a writer living in Iowa City. He welcomes comments, questions, and long, awkward pauses from apologetic baseball players here and at dfleming1986@yahoo.com).     
 
 

COMMENTS (19 Comments, most recent shown first)

BillGray
Dave, I know you are talking about "now" but by applying your definitions to players of the past, you would eliminate Roberto Clemente's 1966 MVP season becasue he stole only 7 bases and was caught 5 times; he didn't play an important defensive position and he didn't draw enough walks (46). Plus, I think Clemente would pass the PED blood test. Carlos? Not so sure about that.
7:02 AM May 21st
 
DaveFleming
Okay...I'll bite.

Beltran stole 25 bases in 28 attempts, which is a tad better than you suggest.

More advanced: Beltran was worth 35 extra bases last season, +19 in steal attempts and an additional +16 advancing bases in non-steal situations. Bill tracks that now: it's in the stat section.

35 extra bases is a lot: it was the tenth best total in baseball. Of course, speed also helps on defense.

As a fielder, Beltran made thirteen more plays than one would expect him to have made, and was a +22 on John Dewan's system. He was ranked as the second best centerfielder in baseball last year.

You have a player whose baserunner nets your team a cumulative 35 extra bases, and makes 13 extra plays in centerfield, and you'd like to argue that his speed is somehow arbitrary to a discussion about his value?
12:35 AM Apr 21st
 
tbell
Stealing 20 bases in 27.5 attempts adds … how many hundredths of one single win to a team?

Forget about your screen for virtually worthless stolen bases, and Beltran becomes forgotten once again.
1:52 PM Apr 7th
 
jollydodger
Fair or not, I don't think of Beltran as GREAT because vs. RHP he's less than stellar. Most hitters have the same issue, but the truly great ones hit no matter which hand the pitch is thrown with.
7:38 PM Mar 9th
 
ventboys
Also in regards to my man Jimmy, his black ink, gray ink and the hall monitors show him to be roughly half way to glory. That's kinda where I see him, halfway there. He could be a 300 homer, 500 SB, 1800 run first ballot lock, he could be Jim Fregosi. I tend to think that he'll end up closer to the former than the latter, but that's why they play the games.
5:57 PM Mar 8th
 
ventboys
Rollins is one of those guys that, halfway through, looks like a strong candidate. He has some good markers, like almost 1500 hits going into his age 30 year, the 2 gold gloves, the MVP, the ring, and some other good starts to his counting stats.

Going against him, his career OPS+ is 99. In his MVP year it was only 118, one of the lower numbers you will find. While he has those 2 gold gloves, I haven't heard him compared to Ozzie, or even Omar. He had some injury issues with his wheels this past year, and he had kind of a horsbleep year by his previous standards. He hasn't, despite some big years, been voted to the Allstar team since 2002, and he hasn't played in one since 2005.

I doubt that the negatives will matter if he is able to get up close to 3000 hits, but to do that he'll have to get back to where he was in 2006-2007. If he doesn't he'll probably still put up another thousand hits and be in the discussion.

Part of that discussion will be his comps. Through age 29, Alan Trammell and Lou Whitaker made his comps list. So did Jim Fregosi, Marty McManus and Ed Renteria. His "good" comps are Ryne Sandberg, Robbie Alomar, Derek Jeter, Larry Doyle and Bobby Doerr.

Nine of his ten closest comps through age 29 had higher OPS+ career numbers than Rollins, grouped between 110 and 116 other than Renteria (a comtemperary, 96), McManus (played in the 1920's and 1930's, 102), Jeter (comtemporary, 120) and Larry Doyle (deadball star, 126).

I have to say that I am not convinced that he's a Hall of Famer, and that he has more work to do than simply bulking up his numbers. He needs to keep the heads turning, and the awards coming. He's in the race, though, which is no mean feat.
5:51 PM Mar 8th
 
DaveFleming
Jimmy Rollins is an interesting one. Ventboys commented that Rollins needs another 2007 season to be a HOF candidate.

Just my two-cents, but I think Rollins is a HOF-type player without the MVP. He's a shortstop who steals bases and scores runs. He's won a few Gold Gloves, and a World Championship.

He'll be 30 this year. Let's say he doubles his stats and finished in the ballpark of 250 HR, 600 doubles, 150 triples, 1000 RBI, 1600 Runs, 2900 Hits, and 550 stolen bases. Add four or five Gold Gloves...I think he's a HOF even with the low OBP.

The MVP year was huge: it improved his chances dramatically. But I think J-Roll had good odds even before the MVP season.

And last year there were a few positives suggesting he will age well. 2008 was the first time he walked more than he struck out, which is great for a leadoff guy. And he stole 47 bases in 50 attempts, which suggests he's getting craftier at stealing bases.

I don't know if Jimmy Rollins is a Great Player, but he's a very good one. What's more, he's the kind of player who typically gets into the Hall without too much trouble.
7:04 PM Mar 3rd
 
ventboys
Last year wasn't a banner year for Hall of Fame moves. Albert won the NL MVP, which just adds to what was already a Hall career. Roy Halladay added a 2nd 20 win season, started his 3rd allstar game, and is now 131-66 in his career, but has yet to pitch in the postseason. Pedroia, as you said, is building a case, but it's early for him. Cliff Lee needs to do what he did again before I would call him a potential Hall candidate. Moose finally got his 20 win season, Ryan Howard put up more big numbers and got a ring, but might have actually hurt his cause a bit with his BA struggles. Chase Utley is playing in the manner of a Hall of Famer, but he keeps getting hurt before he can get the bigtime awards, and his late start will make it hard for him to put up bulk numbers. David Wright, Mark Texiera, Hanley Ramirez, Johan Santana, they all had terrific years and are on pace, but need to keep on choogling for a few more years. All of those guys are strong candidates to make a big move this year, but none of them really did the kind of things that jump your case out of the pack last year. Halladay was the closest, I think, missing out on his 2nd Cy Young when Lee went 22-3.

I have one, how about Chipper?

He won his first batting title, and also led the NL in onbase percentage. His year doesn't really jump out at you, because he missed about 40 games. Looking back at it, though, which is what the voters will be doing, he went over 400 career homers, is now up to 2277 hits, and is about 125 runs and rbi from 1500. Also, he went over 1500 games at third base, which might mean something as well. I am inclined to think that he was a Hall of Famer anyway, but that was assuming that he could continue to play at a high level and accumulate some numbers. By hitting .364 with good power, setting a career high for OPS+, he was able to do that.

My personal HOF gray area team for 2009:

C- Jorge Posada (needs to add at least a couple more good years)
1B- Mark Texiera (on the big stage now)
2B- Chase Utley (needs to win the MVP, not just be the MVP)
3B- Troy Glaus or Scott Rolen (need to stop the bleeding)
SS- Jimmy Rollins (a repeat of 2007 makes him a candidate, 2008 and he's not)
LF- Matt Holliday (we'll see if he can put up big numbers out of Coors)
CF- Carlos Beltran (I think we've covered him....)
RF- Magglio Ordonez (career .312, 1830 hits and 268 homers, 35 years old)
DH- David Ortiz (He's not there yet. Probably needs at least 2 more big years)
SP- Roy Halladay (131-66, age 31, needs more big years to get there)
RP- K-Rod, maybe. He is a long ways away.
8:36 PM Feb 28th
 
Kev
He's definitely severely underrated, but as you say, consider:

2008 vs RHP: 458 AB .266/360/.458. Hardly compelling. I wouldn't claim "balance" for him considering great difference vs LHP: .326/.413/.601, with more than twice as many AB vs RHP. And please, no Willie Mays in this discussion. Just the same, I'd love to have him; I just think you went just a bit too far.
11:31 AM Feb 27th
 
DaveFleming
Everyone is right to point out that the standards are unfair. Obviously David Wright and Chase Utley are as complete as any player in the game today, and I was cherry-picking a bit.

To ventboys's comment: it'd be cool to come up with a way to measure which players have dramatically improved their HOF chances over the course of each year.

I think Pedroia pretty much made himself a HOF candidate last year. Now all he has to do is stick around and pad his counting numbers. Mauer's second batting title is impressive. Sabbathia gave his career a nice narrative to go along with fine numbers. Mike Mussina's always been a HOF'er, but he finally got to 20 wins. Maybe Mussina is the answer.
10:16 PM Feb 24th
 
ventboys
Bill has, in the past, mentioned players that most helped and hurt their Hall chances each year. Beltran, perhaps, is a guy that is in position to do one or the other of those things this year. A good article might be written about the Hall of fame "crossroads"...

A few others might be Rollins, Utley, Halladay, Posada, Peavy, Oswalt, I am sure that I am missing quite a few.
2:01 PM Feb 22nd
 
3for3
Good article. Nice to point out a player underappreciated, even in this modern era of 'overappreciation'. I have a minor quibble about the methodology as well. A player can be great, the best player in baseball, without passing every single one of your tests. His 64 BB's are just below your number, but that may also be Howard influenced. He is a truly complete player, to my eye, and I see him every day.


Danny


Take Chase Utley, who misses your cut because he doesn't steal enough bases. The man was 14-16 as a stealer, and he bats in front of Ryan Howard. There is no doubt in my mind he could steal 30 if the team needed that.
11:18 AM Feb 22nd
 
Richie
Agree with the other guys here. Darn good product, but you're selling tactics are a touch seedy. Most importantly, darn good product/article, though. Thanks!

I'll also second what 'Jeff' says. I recall that Beltran got a lotta ink when he and the Astros went deeper into the postseason. Postseason gets you attention.
11:35 PM Feb 20th
 
evanecurb
Dave:

You are correct. Beltran is very, very good, and I have him in my top 10 (Pujols, A Rod, Beltran, Utley, Wright, Sizemore, Youklis, Pedroia, Hanley Ramirez, and Mauer are my top 10), but you overshot your mark. No way he was more valuable than Pujols last year or any other year. Both are hall of fame caliber players, but there is really no comparison in terms of value to their teams, in 2008 or in any other season. I was very impressed with the manner in which you showed Tenace to be as valuable as Rice. I don't think you can make the case that Beltran is the equal of Pujols. I do, however, think that Beltran is a first ballot Hall of Famer (assuming his career path follows a normal trend line).
10:25 PM Feb 20th
 
jeffsol
I agree with ventboys. While Beltran is outstanding, this is a bit like the "group" arguments that Bill pooh-poohed in Politics of Glory. He shouldn't need it to be appreciated. His breadth of skills is likely highest in MLB today, but that's not exactly the same as being the best player. That said, while I'm biased as a Mets fan, I had Beltran on my list. Ruling Wright, for example, who stole 35 bases against 5 CS just a year ago out because he only had 15 last year is a bit disingenuous.
7:43 PM Feb 20th
 
wydiyd
Just a note, for Carlos to get more recognition, the Mets need to make the postseason. A player that makes the postseason, on average, gets an additional 15% more votes than a player with similar stats that doesn't.
11:14 AM Feb 20th
 
schoolshrink
Cool article, Dave. I did not think of him immediately, but after seeing the name the response was, "Oh ... O.K." Bill wrote years ago about being frustrated with statistics, suggesting that they did not provide all answers about players and the value to their teams. Over inflating one statistical category at the expense of others does not necessarily create greatness in a player. If the team wins as the result of good stats, that's different. Hence Win Shares became a valuable commodity.
8:42 AM Feb 20th
 
alljoeteam
My list was Pujols, Berkman, Wright, H. Ramirez, Utley, Beltran, A-Rod, Mauer, Sizemore, Teixeira.
1:15 AM Feb 20th
 
ventboys
Good stuff, Dave, except that you made a typical mistake, by drawing the lines under him. Make batting average .300, he's out. Make walks 100, he's out. Make homers 30, he's clipping your "bar".

That being said, I totally agree with you, Beltran is underrated. He had that one bad year with the Mets, and as you say he's a balanced, rounded player with no real hook to his record. At his age, he's on a collision course between recognition and irrelevance, in all likelyhood. It would help him if the Mets can get to the World Series this year, and he can clip some of those higher bars without knocking them down.
11:04 PM Feb 19th
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy