Remember me

A Glance at the Races - AL

June 11, 2009
 
A quick peak at the American League pennant races.
 
AL EAST
 
 
W-L
GB
Yankees
34-24
--
Red Sox
34-24
--
Blue Jays
33-27
2.5
Rays
29-30
6
Orioles
24-33
10
 
That didn’t last long.
 
For about thirty games the AL East looked interesting: the Blue Jays were playing terrific baseball, and the Yankees were mired in fourth place, sandwiched between the Rays and Orioles. Now it seems we’re back to business as usual: the Yankees and Red Sox are in first, and Toronto, Tampa, and Baltimore are battling over who will finish third.
 
It’s fascinating, frankly, that the Yankees are in first. The team has been beset by numerous problems, from the poor pitching of Wang, Burnett, and Hughes, to the injury to Nady, to all the noise about Alex Rodriguez. Yet they remain in first place.
 
We keep hearing reasons why the Yankees system won’t work, how sooner or later the madcap spending will catch up to them, and how their organization’s failure to patiently develop young talent will cripple them.  
 
It hasn’t happened yet, and one has to start wondering if we’ve all just been blowing a lot of hot air. It is becoming increasing difficult to imagine any scenario where the Yankees can’t field a strong, competitive team.
 
Okay…enough about that: objectively the Yankees have been the fourth best team in the AL East:
 
 
Runs Scored
Runs Allowed
Difference
Boston
307
257
+57
Tampa Bay
330
284
+46
Toronto
312
271
+41
New York
326
300
+26
Baltimore
263
321
-58
 
Tampa Bay has gotten trounced in close games this year, posting a 6-13 record in games decided by one run, the worst record in the majors. Yet they’ve played near the level of Boston in the early goings, out-scoring their opponents by 46 runs.
 
Boston, despite the concerns over David Ortiz, the injury to Jed Lowrie, and a bad stretch by Matsuzaka, have managed to play good baseball over the early season. Of note: they haven’t lost against the Yankees.  
 
This is such a terrifically hard division: only the Dodgers have outscored their opponents by more runs than Boston, Tampa Bay, and Toronto. It is not a stretch to say that four of the six best teams in baseball right now reside in the American League East.
 
For that reason, it’s a hard race to predict: if you’re a Yankee fan, you have to be impressed that the team has won games through all of the madness of the early season. If you’re not a Yankee fan, the failures of Wang and Burnett and the silly decision to move Hughes into the bullpen are red flags for the team. And the Yankees have gotten lucky: they have something like twenty comeback wins this year, and six walk-off victories. There are reasons to be nervous.
 
For Boston, there are obvious concerns, starting with Dice-K and Ortiz. But the return of Smoltz, the pitching of Beckett, Lester, and Penny, and the brilliant bullpen are all huge positives.
 
For Toronto, they’ve managed to win despite terrible starts by Alex Rios and Vernon Wells. And Tampa Bay just called up David Price. Both teams have been playing on-par with the Red Sox and Yankees: it’s just their records don’t show that reality.
 
AL CENTRAL
 
 
W-L
GB
Tigers
31-26
--
Twins
28-31
4
White Sox
27-32
4.5
Royals
24-32
6.5
Indians
25-34
7
 
The Tigers, the only winning team in the AL West right now, are playing about as good as they can. Miguel Cabrera has been terrific, even by his standards, and Brandon Inge has been a bizarre surprise through the first 60-odd games of the season. Justin Verlander has been otherworldly, striking out 11.3 batters per nine innings, and Edwin Jackson (2.16 ERA) has been an early surprise.
 
I think we’re seeing the Tigers at their very best, and it would be difficult for them to maintain their current high level of play. Sooner or later the Tigers will hit a rough stretch, and then the wolves will be at the door. Even Cleveland, probably the most disappointing team in the majors right now, is one hot streak away from being back in the race.
 
The Twins are the polar opposites of the Tigers. With some exceptions (Mauer, Morneau, Cuddyer) the Twins are playing as poorly as anyone could have expected. Nick Blackburn leads the rotation with a 3.30 mark, better than Francisco Liriano (6.12), Scott Baker (5.88), or Kevin Slowey (4.21). The team’s double-play combo of Casilla and Punto are hitting .180 and .187 respectively, and two of the young outfielders (Delmon Young and Carlos Gomez) have been unproductive at the plate.
 
Minnesota has endured an awful beginning to the year. They lost Joe Mauer for the first month of the season. Their two best pitchers, Liriano and Baker, have been lousy. And their young players have, by-and-large, failed to do anything noteworthy. Yet they’re in second place. By season’s end they’ll be in first.
 
The best players on the White Sox are the old guys: Thome, Dye, and Konerko. That isn’t a good sign. Carlos Quentin, who is young, has been on the DL for the last two weeks, and is having a disappointing season. Alexei Ramirez, the all-purpose runner-up for the ROY last year, has posted a .662 OPS on the early year, though he’s at least learning how to steal bases without getting caught.
 
The same holds true for the rotations: Buehrle and Colon have been better than Floyd and Danks; Octavio Dotel and Scott Linebrink (both 32 years old) have been better than closer Bobby Jenks (28).
 
A team whose best players are all older than thirty is a team that I wouldn’t be optimistic about.
 
I think just about every baseball fan I know roots for the Royals in some way or another. I certainly do. Zack Greinke makes it easier. I hope the Royals make a charge, but it’s looking unlikely.  
 
Cleveland is nearing the ‘mad-scientist’ stage of the season, where they can basically try whatever they want, and see what works. They have one hundred games to experiment with. Let Carmona make starts? Sure. Why not? See if Hafner can come back? It can’t hurt. Heck, why not tell Kerry Wood to rest up his arm for next year, and give some young players a shot at closing for the rest of the year. And tell Shin-Soo Choo and Ben Francisco steal as often as they want.
 
It’s interesting that most teams don’t do anything of any particular interest when the team reaches that point of no return.
 
AL WEST
 
 
W-L
GB
Rangers
33-24
--
Angels
28-27
4
Mariners
28-29
5
A's
26-30
6.5
 
The Rangers pitching has been average this year, which for Texas is nothing short of astonishing. The team ERA (4.69) is hovering near the league mark (4.59).

I wouldn’t expect it to last. Last year the Rangers had an ERA of 5.37, more than a run higher than the league average (4.36). When the weather turns hot in Texas, the rotation will suffer.
 
The Angels finally have their rotation back together, with Lackey, Santana, and Escobar all coming off the DL. Still, the offensive declines of Bobby Abreau (2 homeruns) and Vlad Guerrero is of some concern: If Torii Hunter is your best hitter, you should be worried.
 
It’s hard to see what’s worse about the Griffey Farewell Tour: that the Kid is hitting just .219, or that he’s second on the team in homeruns (6). Nice to have Eric Beddard back.
 
There has been a lot of talk about the A’s shopping Matt Holliday around, and he has expressed some interest in going to a contender. The A’s current seven-game winning streak has them within striking distance, and that talk has been put on the back burner.
 
It’s hard to imagine a Billy Beane team being last in the league in OPS, but that’s where the A’s fall right now: the team’s .673 mark is the worst in the majors.
 
Six-and-a-half games is a big gap, but that gap is significant only if you believe the Rangers are the team to beat. I don’t think they are. The Oakland A’s are only two-and-a-half games behind the Angels, which is nothing right now.
 
I’ll still take Oakland to win the West.
 
(Dave Fleming is a writer living in Iowa City. He welcomes comments, questions, and suggestions here and at dfleming1986@yahoo.com.)
 
 

COMMENTS (16 Comments, most recent shown first)

Kev
Yanks win, but only if:
1. Joba remains a starter--he is showing progress. He doesn'have command or control for a closer job.
2. Hughes stays in the bullpen, putting out fires in the 7th and 8th. This guy is scary when he doesn't have to pace himself. I think he will grow to like his job, and thus become even more effective. Bruney is a luxury--keep him.
3. They achieve even average consistncy at the plate. They probably will; if they start banging like the old Bombers, (they probably won't) they win easily.
2:56 PM Jun 30th
 
DaveFleming
Sorry I haven't chimed in on the discussion: I've been on vacation in Nepal and India for the last three weeks, so I haven't had much of a chance to add anything. I'm back in the States now, and should start cranking more articles out this week.
8:31 PM Jun 29th
 
ventboys
My 2 cents, AL West

Texas… Their park factor was just barely over neutral last year. I tried to find their actual park factor for this year, and what I found makes it look like their PF is about 1.030, up a bit from last year’s 1.011. I do like a couple of their pitchers, but they probably will need to stay healthy to stay on top.

Angels…. What else can go wrong? They are only 2 games back anyway. As a betting man. I have a hard time finding a reason to pick anyone else to win. If the AL West was a horse race the Angels would be about 3-5 against the field right now, I think.

A’s… Terrific young talent on the mound, but offensively they are really weak. Even with Cust, Giambi and Holliday walking a lot they have less than 1 walk per 10 atbats, and the team OPS is .668. They are actually overperforming their offense, as far as runs scored. Dave, I wouldn’t mind it if you were right, but I don’t see it.

M’s…. Junior’s .696 OPS is 3rd on the team. How ugly is that? The pitching has been pretty good, and for the first time since Safeco opened they seem to be taking some advantage of the park. The outfield is speedy, and the staff seems to have finally figured that they can trust the defense other than Betancourt, who really needs to be replaced. If the M’s had a dynamite defensive shortstop, I wouldn’t completely rule out their chances of staying in the mix. I don’t like the talent base at all, but I do like what Z man is doing in the early days of his rebuilding program. He seems to get the park, and how to build a team here.

11:50 PM Jun 16th
 
ventboys
My AL Central 2 cents-

First of all, Dave I agree that you pretty much nailed this one. I had to dig into the stats to find anything worth posting, and even that is of dubious worth, as bunting would say. That never stopped me before, though. Why would it now?

Detroit… Their catcher, Gerald Laird, is hitting. .217-.321-.312. That stinks, but his backups aren’t exactly hidden gems. They are a combined 3-44 with 1 double, 1 walk, and 20 strikeouts. Their pitching staff is a mix of young studs and (still young, for the most part) pitchers that could be the subject of one of those “behind the music” shows, something like “behind the rotator cuff” or something. Dontrell, Bonderman, Zumaya, Seay (remember him when he was drafted, the fight over his contract?), this team would look a lot better if they were anything close to their former potential.

There might be a bit more upside here than you say, Dave, but not much. Mags is slugging .348, Migs .525. I assume that they will do better, but there is no bench here to speak of and most of their eggs are in the basket of a trio of pitchers that carry a LOT of risk.

Twinkies… I love their talent base. They have the stars, and the good young pitching and some staff depth, but they have huge, gaping holes at several positions. This would be the perfect team for someone like, say, Bill to take a shot at. Fill in those holes and this team could compete with anyone. My first impulse was that Brendan Harris should be playing every day in the middle infield, but his defensive numbers stink across the board, and they have stunk for his entire career.

I really like that kid Mijares, but I don’t like how they are using him. He’s way underused, and it’s keeping him from holding onto his command. He is 24 now, and I predict some nice things from him down the road, when he gets a chance to pitch more often. I get why they are babying him, as he broke his arm last spring. Watch him, though. He’s got terrific stuff.

White Sox… I’ve never been able to get warm with this team, for some reason. I love Ozzie, but they don’t have anyone hitting .300 other than Podsednik, who is under .400 in ob and slg. It’s all slow pitch softball hitters, speed guys that don’t do anything else, and Alexie Ramirez who is confused about what he is supposed to be, since he isn’t slow and he can’t get on base. Alex, my man, just gain about a hundred pounds and start taking pitches. You will fit right in.

It’s a weird juxtaposition. The manager is as fiery as they come, but for the most part this is a very methodical team. Their ace is the epitome of the professional pitcher. I can respect them, but it’s hard to get into them. They are just so vanilla….

KC…. Coco Crisp is the only player on this team that has even 20 walks so far. Jacobs is the only one with 10 homers, and he has exactly 10. The only player on the entire roster with an .800 ops is Alberto Callaspo, who came into the season with 399 atbats in his career, and zero homers. They are scoring 4 runs a game in one of the best hitters’ parks in the league. Their star began the season 2-21 and then went on the DL for the rest of the first half of the season, at least. Take Greinke off of this team and they are 19-32, and I am not sure that they are even that good. 2009, at least so far, has been a disaster for the Royals.

Indians….. Cliff Lee: Lessee, 97 innings, 20 walks, 69 k’s, 5 homers allowed. What would be the expected hits allowed? I looked around, I can’t find his babip, but with 109 hits allowed it has to be pretty high. Lee’s era is now below 3 anyway. Is he for real? If you ask me, I would say that he is. How he does it, I dunno, but he does it.

That’s it, though. There is not one single other pitcher on their roster that anyone can count on. They are scoring 5 runs a game despite some injury and underperformance problems, but they just can’t pitch. It’s too bad. This is the only team in the division with a real bench.

2:31 AM Jun 15th
 
ventboys
I get you guys about the blog thing, I sure understood that it was a new posting, sorry Evan. I still think that the posts that you guys added are a big addition, or at least that I really wanted to read your opinions, and the more the merrier for me. You guys are the smart ones, and most blog posts are done by less than educated baseball fans.

I will, personally, happily put up with any possible redundancy or irrelevency as a necessary part of the process.

Opinion, in the mind of the educated, holds much truth, more than you might think. Hell, I read fantasy chap wraps several times a week, just for a few good nuggets in the mix of mostly redundancy. On this site, there are so many smart and educated baseball minds that it would be tough NOT to say something worth reading.

Bunting, I personally would love to read anything that you have to say. You added some nice stuff even while you were dismissing the value of your opinions.

None of this is up to me, of course. I just vote for more rather than less, and I have the last 7 years of BP in a pile for bathroom reading, after devouring them all cover to cover when I got them. It's not the stats that matter the most, it's the opinions from an educated source. You guys, to me, are an educated source. I want to read you cover to cover, too.
1:08 AM Jun 15th
 
clayyearsley
Another good article, Dave.
I'm a Rangers homer, so view these comments with an appropriate level of skepticism...
You pointed out that Texas has an ERA close to the AL average, when last year it was a full run over the average. Your point, that they won't keep that up, seems logical. However, I disagree with it, even with a couple of their starters on the shelf. As John Dewan discussed in the Stat of the Week a while back, the Rangers are MUCH improved defensively. I believe that has as much to do with the drop in ERA as the new mental state enforced on the pitching staff by Mike Maddux and Nolan Ryan - they challenged the pitchers' toughness and have pushed them to gut it up and face more hitters. In the end, that mentality may wear on the staff, but it's helped the bullpen to this point.
Anyway, moving Michael Young to 3B, making way for Elvis Andrus at SS, and sticking with Chris Davis at 1B in spite of his meager batting average has made the infield defense solid, whereas last year it was horrible.
8:42 AM Jun 14th
 
Richie
There's not all that much here to discuss, Vent. No clashing values to flesh out, no evidence to be sifted and assigned this- rather than that-much-weight. It's just Dave's intuitive opinions on the AL races, which can be intuitively agreed or disagreed with. Whoever wants to swap opinions is welcome to. Myself, I don't know who's gonna win what, and I'll find out soon enough anyway.
3:22 PM Jun 12th
 
evanecurb
Ventboys:

Gee whiz, give us a minute, will you? I just saw this today.

All:

When I see the Red Sox of the past three years play, I feel that I am watching one of the most solid teams of the past thirty years. While the decline of Big Papi hurts and needs to be addressed, the fact remains that Pedroia, Drew, Bay, and Youklis are all high OBP guys with good power. The rest of the lineup is above average as well.

Their starting pitching is deep, and their bullpen is one of the best in baseball. Okajima's performance in Wednesday night's game vs. New York was brilliant, and he does this consistently.

But Tampa could be the equal of Boston. So much youth, so much talent. We'll see if their careers follow a normal trajectory and if they can retain their core players long term.

The Yankees' approach is only sustainable if they are willing to release declining players before their contracts. Because talent evaluation is always imperfect, some portion of the big signings will be money wasted. What is done with those players will make or break the team that adopts the Yankees' strategy. What happens is this:

The team has three needs to fill, so goes into the free agent market and signs three top notch players to long term deals at the veteran free agent going rate. The cost of these three signings is much greater than their base salaries. There is a luxury tax cost, of course, but even that doesn't cover the entire cost.

In year two, the team realizes that one of the three veterans who were signed is not working out. So they decide to sign another high priced free agent to replace the person who is only one year into his deal. They are now double paying for that roster spot, and paying additional luxury tax.

The Yankees strategy will work, but it sure is expensive.

The O's are doing lots of good things with young players. They should continue their recent strategy of trading top players for prospects. It is working. If I were running the team, I would shop Roberts, Mora, and Huff and see what's out there. Wouldn't trade them for less than their full value in prospects, but would love to see a replay of the Tejada and Bedard deals. I personally believe that Roberts would be a great addition to the Cubs, Mets, Rays, or Angels, so worth a shot.

Gutsy calls on the Twins and A's. I follow the reasoning, especially with the Twins. The A's won't make it, though. They simply won't score enough runs and I think this could be the year that Texas finally returns to the postseason.
11:03 AM Jun 12th
 
sdbunting
@vent: I've run sites/blogs for a while now, and in my experience -- which may or may not be indicative -- when you write something that's solid, that's interesting and correct and dovetails with what readers believe et cetera and so forth, people are less likely to comment. Challenge a widely-held belief, make what's perceived as an error, and people are lining up to say their pieces. Do the job adequately, nobody's got boo to say.

I'm a Yanks fan who agrees with Fleming's points about the team, and who has said every year for the last five, this is the year we finish fourth. I hated the Burnett signing at the time, and I'm not happy to be proven right. Matsui looks like my great-aunt out there, but now that he's hitting at last, A-Rod and Cano have gone cold. Why didn't I post these mutterings unprompted? Because they don't really add anything *new* to the discussion, and derailing it with a complaint about the Joba/bullpen debate is something I can annoy people with on my own blog.

But if you want to talk Yanks up in this joint, let's do it.

And while I'm up: Mr. Fleming, solid article, and I liked the "mad scientist" image. Thanks for the good work.
10:53 AM Jun 12th
 
sdbunting
@vent: I've run sites/blogs for a while now, and in my experience -- which may or may not be indicative -- when you write something that's solid, that's interesting and correct and dovetails with what readers believe et cetera and so forth, people are less likely to comment. Challenge a widely-held belief, make what's perceived as an error, and people are lining up to say their pieces. Do the job adequately, nobody's got boo to say.

I'm a Yanks fan who agrees with Fleming's points about the team, and who has said every year for the last five, this is the year we finish fourth. I hated the Burnett signing at the time, and I'm not happy to be proven right. Matsui looks like my great-aunt out there, but now that he's hitting at last, A-Rod and Cano have gone cold. Why didn't I post these mutterings unprompted? Because they don't really add anything *new* to the discussion, and derailing it with a complaint about the Joba/bullpen debate is something I can annoy people with on my own blog.

But if you want to talk Yanks up in this joint, let's do it.

And while I'm up: Mr. Fleming, solid article, and I liked the "mad scientist" image. Thanks for the good work.
10:32 AM Jun 12th
 
ventboys
Typing fast reveals character, or at least typing skills. Lets talk some baseball, guys. Dave laid it out like a slow meatball changeup, lets take a swing.
4:00 AM Jun 12th
 
ventboys
Sorry, but this really bothers me. Do you guys really care more about Manny, Barry, and all of that crap than real baseball, real pennant races? This is some terrific stuff here. This is what we should be talking about, isn't it?

Pennant races, breakthrough players, hot pitchers, deep staffs, injury risks, manager blunders, post hype under the radar players like Any LaRoche, former overrated but now overrated for a week or two until God sorts it out
(Pierre), guys that we love (Aaron Hill, Wandy Rodriguez), and guys that we hate (any Yankee that I don't own in my fantasy league, Fat Elvis), and guys that we cross our fingers for (Wang, Oswalt, Carp, Joba, Dontrell)....

I am just asking. Isn't this why we love baseball? This thread should be 400 posts, not 3. This is talking baseball, not meaningless off the field crap. I love it, and I am somewhat surprised that you don't agree with me. Should be just wait for Manny's baby? Not me, I am not interested. I am tracking Buckholz in AAA, I am way too busy for the latest update on Farve. You go ahead....
3:56 AM Jun 12th
 
ventboys
I was going to post my 2 cents for the AL central tonight, but I am more interested in why in the hell nobody is posting on this thread. A foul ball gets about a hundred posts, but some actual between the lines analysis gets almost nothing?

It's day one, I guess. I'll just wait. Am I the only one here that actually cares about what happens between the lines?
3:41 AM Jun 12th
 
ventboys
Healthy, regarding the Yankees, is a relative term. Healthier than I expected would be the better phrase.
1:00 PM Jun 11th
 
ventboys
AL East 2 cents-

The Yankees' run differential is a bit misleading I think, as they were blown out a few times early on when Wang and a couple of others had huge meltdowns. They are scoring nearly 6 runs a game, partly beccause the new stadium is a launching pad and partly because their aging lineup has been fairly healthy so far.

I don't assume that this will continue, since over half of their lineup is 33 or older, 4 of them are 35 plus, and they have an extremely weak bench. Of course, someone will give them an allstar or two pretty much for free, to dump salary. Their pitching is better than it looks in the records, with several upside candidates and no obvious flukes.

I am a Rays believer, but I am not confident for this year. They have talent in loads, but they lost the middle of their infield to injury and the bullpen is a mess. They keep losing late, and even when they win it's nervously. This is the first time that these guys have had any pressure on them.

Boston has rats in their celler, with their own serious aging problems in the lineup, but their pitching is deep and working well. I see them as the team to beat until the Yanks pick up a couple of players, at least. Toronto has interesting talent, but I am skeptical as they built up that early 27-14 record mostly against the AL West. Baltimore is going in the right direction, but they are a year or two away.
12:27 PM Jun 11th
 
azhitnik
The Yanks run differential is skewed by that 22 - 4 loss they suffered at the hands of Cleveland back in April. If that's even a 10 - 4 loss they're at +38.
12:22 PM Jun 11th
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy