Remember me

Who is the MVP of the Yankee Dynasty?

July 21, 2009
 
On September 4th, 1995, a sunny Monday afternoon in the Bronx, the latest incarnation of the Yankee dynasty arrived.
 
In the top of the 9th inning, with the Bronx Bombers beating Seattle 13-3, two defensive changes were made. Twenty-one year-old Derek Jeter, called up from Columbus when the rosters expanded, came in to replace Tony Fernandez. And Jorge Posada, making his first appearance in a major league game, took over catching duties from Jim Leyritz, settling in to take throws from Joe Ausiano. Neither player had a chance to bat, and for Posada the quick inning was the only playing time he’d see in 1995.
 
The next night, with the Yankees playing the Orioles at Camden Yards, a young Panamanian recently demoted to the bullpen after a series of disappointing starts came in to relieve starter Sterling Hitchcock. With the score 4-1 in favor of the Orioles, the right-hander walked Cal Ripken to load the bases, before giving up a grand slam to Bobby Bonilla.
 
Auspicious starts, perhaps, but fourteen seasons later, the three men remain in pinstripes, integral members of a team that has gone 1317-877. Together, they have been to fourteen postseasons, played in six World Series, and won four Championships. Two of the men, Rivera and Jeter, are certain Hall-of-Famers, while Posada has built an excellent case for enshrinement.
 
So: barroom debate time. Which players has been the most important player to the Yankees? Who has been the key to the Yankees success? Who is the MVP of the dynasty?
 
The Arguments For And Against
 
Before I get to the numbers, a few quick arguments for the three players, should you ever find yourself in a bar full of Yankee fans, and want to start trouble:
 
Derek Jeter
 
Arguments for Jeter: #2 is the most ‘Yankee’, meaning he fits nicely with the line of Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, and Mantle. He has calm eyes and a preternatural ability to elevate his game when it counts. He has played more games than the other two, and plays the most important defensive position on the field. He is the team captain and the face (and possible scent) of the franchise. He will be the first Yankee to reach 3000 hits.
 
Arguments against Jeter: There is little empirical evidence to suggest that Jeter is any different a player in clutch situations than he is in more pedestrian times. He’s a shortstop, sure, but it would help if he wasn’t the worst defensive shortstop of all-time. Plus: Mr. November? That’s the third variation of a Yankee nickname. Shouldn’t he have something more original?
 
Who argues for Jeter in a bar room debate? Anyone from New York, New Jersey, or western Connecticut. People who love the grace of a wild spin-throw from deep shortstop. Joe Buck. Jeremy Giambi.
 
Who argues against Jeter in a bar room debate? Anyone who typically drops their ‘r’s when talking. Bill James. Alex Rodriguez.  
 
Mariano Rivera
 
Arguments for Rivera: The greatest relief pitcher of all-time. The greatest postseason pitcher of all-time (117 IP, 0.76 ERA). Pitch-for-pitch, perhaps the greatest pitcher of all-time. Almost certainly the greatest Yankee pitcher of all-time. The rock-steady force closing things down at the end of the game.
 
Arguments against Rivera: Doesn’t possess that same sense of ‘leader-ness’ that Jeter has in spades. The blown save in Game 7 of the 2001 World Series. And he’s a closer: it is probably easier to find a replacement closer than it is to find a shortstop or catcher.
 
Who argues for Rivera in a bar room debate? Outside the box thinkers. People who believe that protecting a three-run lead in the 9th inning is ‘saving’ a game. Bostonians who begrudgingly respect Rivera. People who just want to piss off Jeter fans.
 
Who argues against Rivera in a bar room debate? George King, the sportswriter who left Pedro Martinez off his 1999 MVP ballot. Because only everyday players should be considered.
 
Jorge Posada
 
Arguments for Posada: Part of a long line of great Yankee catchers: just about every time the Yankees have a dynasty, they have a great catcher calling the games. In the team’s history they have Dickey, Berra, Elston Howard, Thurman Munson, and Posada. You wanna win games; it sure helps to have a catcher.
 
Arguments against Posada: Well, you don’t hear it often. He’s flying under the radar, which is tough to do if you play for the Yankees. If he was the most important player on the 1996-2009 Yankees, how come no one has made that argument? I think he’s a Hall-of-Famer, but he’s not the lock that Jeter and Rivera are.
 
Who argues for Posada in a bar room debate? People who grew up during the 1950’s, when people actually valued catchers enough to give them MVP awards. People who think really outside the box. My grandfather.
 
Who argues against Posada in a bar room debate? Philistines. Heathens. Most everyone, actually. C’mon: Posada? Over Jeter? Over Mariano? You’re crazy.
 
Alright, enough messing around. Let’s look at some advanced metrics. Who is more valuable? Which player has been the key cog to the Yankee machine?
 
Win Shares
 
I compared the three players using three metrics. The first is Win Shares, created by Bill James. For anyone new to this site, Win Shares measure offensive and defensive/pitching contributions. A Win Share represents a third of a win: that is, a team that wins 100 games has 300 Win Shares divided among its players. A season of 30 or more Win Shares is, generally, an MVP-type season. A player who contributes 0 Win Shares has done nothing to help their team.
 
 
Jeter
Posada
Rivera
1995
1
--
2
1996
18
0
18
1997
19
6
15
1998
27
15
14
1999
35
10
17
2000
23
29
16
2001
28
23
19
2002
24
22
9
2003
19
28
17
2004
26
21
18
2005
26
19
19
2006
32
24
16
2007
24.2
24.5
12
2008
18
5
20
2009
15
9
8
Total
335.2
235.5
220
MVP's
9.5
3
1.5
 
As much as this will probably hurt him to hear this, Jeter comes out ahead by Bill’s metric, winning nine of the fourteen possible seasons (Note: I didn’t count 1995 as a season, as none of the players had significant playing time during that season). Posada has three years where he was the most valuable of the three (including 2007, where he edges Jeter by a razor-thin margin). Rivera has just one season when he eclipsed his teammates, plus another year where he and Jeter tied with 18 Win Shares (I don’t have the full count for their 1996 Win Shares).
 
By this metric, Jeter comes out well ahead of Posada and Rivera: over their careers, Jeter has totaled 100 more Win Shares than his Yankee teammates.
 
Win Probability Added (WPA)
 
A stat developed by Tom Tango and available on the baseballfangraphs site, WPA measures how much a player’s actions have contributed to (or decreased) the possibility of their team winning the game. Of note: a WPA of 0 means the player has contributed an average amount to their team’s success. This stat gives more weight to situational factors: hitting a homerun in the bottom of the 9th has more value than hitting a homerun in the top of the first.
 
 
Jeter
Posada
Rivera
1995
-0.14
--
-0.86
1996
-0.29
-0.23
5.26
1997
1.83
-0.11
1.99
1998
4.33
0.16
4.65
1999
6.86
-0.91
3.38
2000
2.25
2.88
2.53
2001
2.19
2.17
3.23
2002
1.24
1.02
1.41
2003
1.39
3.02
3.66
2004
1.98
1.70
5.22
2005
1.41
-1.77
3.85
2006
5.92
2.15
3.45
2007
1.91
2.36
2.64
2008
-0.03
-0.19
4.47
2009
1.00
1.26
2.33
Total
31.87
13.50
47.19
MVP's
2
1
11
 
Here we have a complete reversal, with Mariano Rivera winning eleven of the fourteen seasons. Jeter wins two seasons, while Posada wins just one season, 2000.
 
This isn’t surprising: Mariano Rivera, by virtue of being a closer, is almost certain to make an appearance in high-leverage situations. For Posada and Jeter, it is far less likely that their turn in the batting order will come up when the game is on the line.
 
When trying to decide between Jeter, Rivera, and Posada, should we take into account the situation? Or does that bias things unfairly towards Rivera, to the determent of Jeter and Posada?
 
Wins Above Replacement Player 3
 
WARP-3 is a metric invented by the good folks at baseballprospectus, as the name suggests WARP-3 measures the number of wins a player contributes over a scrub replacement player. WARP-3 is adjusted to add contextual elements, like the quality of the league, into the measurements.
 
 
 
Jeter
Posada
Rivera
1995
-0.3
--
0.3
1996
3.0
-0.3
6.0
1997
3.0
1.7
7.4
1998
9.9
5.3
5.0
1999
9.0
1.9
8.1
2000
5.6
8.4
6.9
2001
4.9
4.6
7.7
2002
3.5
6.5
3.7
2003
2.0
7.8
7.1
2004
5.4
6.5
8.5
2005
8.8
5.1
9.2
2006
8.9
7.9
8.1
2007
6.1
8.5
4.5
2008
4.7
0.7
10.4
2009
6.0
3.8
5.4
Total
80.5
68.3
98.3
MVP's
4
4
6
 
This is more like it: WARP-3 gives us a thoroughly unsatisfying split: 6 MVP’s for Mariano, with four each for Posada and Jeter. In terms of their careers, Rivera comes out 18 wins ahead of Jeter, while Jeter is a dozen wins ahead of Posada.
 
So Who You Gonna Take?
 
It’s interesting that there is such a stark difference between the Win Share totals, which give a sizeable lead to Jeter, and the WPA and WARP-3 totals, which both give Rivera an edge.
 
My gut-response was that I’d take Posada over both Jeter and Rivera, and I don’t think my opinion has changed any. Mariano Rivera is a truly great pitcher, but used strictly as a closer, I don’t know if I believe that his value is drastically higher than Jeter’s or Posada’s. As for the Captain: according to John Dewan’s excellent research, Jeter’s defense has costs the Yankees between 12-26 runs a year since 2004 (and those are the years where his defense has improved). To be frank: I’m not sure how many games it has cost the Yankees to let Derek Jeter play shortstop. And I don’t much care for unknowns.
 
The most important cog in the Yankee machine? I’ll take the guy with the mask.
 
Dave Fleming is a writer living in Iowa City, Iowa. He welcomes comments, questions, and video montages of Derek Jeter making throws from deep short played to the song “Superman (It’s Not Easy)”, both here and at dfleming1986@yahoo.com.
 
 

COMMENTS (11 Comments, most recent shown first)

oldehippy
Give my all his flaws and defensive problems and I'll take Derek Jeter as the MVP of the latest Yankee era every time. The Yankees would not have done nearly as well without Mo or Po or Bernie or Pettitte. However, my first pick is Derek Jeter even when he's having a bad day. Derek Jeter is the very definition of an intangible benefit. As a fan who lived between 3rd base and home plate during the Thurman Munson era, I can't get fully behind Posada until Thurman gets his due.
9:31 AM Aug 5th
 
evanecurb
Maybe it's like the Cowboys of the 90s or the Celtics of the 80s: a three headed monster that is greater than the sum of its parts. Do you think Posada needs to accomplish more before going into the Hall of Fame? I do. I'd put him on par with Munson at this point.
6:16 PM Jul 31st
 
jdrb
I've thought about this column for about a week and realized it's annoyed the hell out of me. I disagree with the conclusion but opinions vary, that's not the problem. What I dislike, on this of all sites, is the subjectivity of your thought process. You pretend to go thru some objective evidence,all of which points to one or the other fairly certain future hall of famer and then say-- essentially, the hell with it, I still like Posada better. Good for you and I personally think Craig Counsell is a hell of a clutch hitter but I'm not going to say it made him the best player on the team when the Marlins won the World Series. For day in and day out value, which Win Shares measures better than anything, I agree Jeter has been the most valuable Yankee over the duration of the last 15 years. Williams was every bit as good, again by Win Shares during the true dynasty of 96-2000. Rivera is the most irreplaceable, which is what your other metrics indicate. Girardi started ahead of Posada in 96 and split time with him in 98-- that's the heart of the dynasty-- so I dont find much to support your argument. Not only was Posada not irreplaceable, he was often replaced.
12:09 AM Jul 31st
 
metsfan17
I'm extremely impressed. I'm a NYer though a Met fan who hates the Yankees but think Posada is one of the most underrated players of all time. Glad to see someone agrees. As much as I love Mariano, I just don't think the closer role is a tough job at all. I believe any competent pitcher can come in with a 1,2 or 3 run lead with nobody ever on base for one inning no matter who is up in the batting order and no matter who you're playing and do this job well. I think the Yankees would have been just as successful with another guy other than Rivera. Its just not that tough a job. Personally, I do believe Derek is the MVP of the this Yankee era though. Watching this guy play everyday, even as a Met fan, its hard not to be impressed.
3:25 PM Jul 30th
 
ventboys
This seems to be forgotten: Jeter lost a year of his career due to some stubborness on the part of the Yankees. He hit .377 in AA, .349 in AAA, in 1994. He spent a year in AAA anyway, in 1995. He was good, not great (.317, not much power), which might be attributed to some frustration, or boredom, or just one of those things. He hit the ground running once they let him play, hitting .314 in 1996 with decent peripherals for a 22 year old rookie.

I looked at Posada, and maybe a case can be made that he was held back since he spent over 2 full years at AAA, but the numbers don't really bear it out. It looks like a normal progression. He improved in AAA to the point that he was ready about when he came up for good.
11:39 PM Jul 25th
 
tjmaccarone
I think a big issue with Posada in the numbers game is that Joe Torre took a while (too long) to come around to the idea that Posada was better than Joe Girardi.
4:25 PM Jul 22nd
 
DaveFleming
Bernie's a tough one: he's going to be another one of those centerfielders who gets forgotten by history. Like Dale Murphy, Freddie Lynn, Jimmy Wynn, and Jim Edmonds. Carlos Beltran...I hope Carlos doesn't wind up in this catagory, but there's a good chance he will.

I think, truly, that Bernie Williams was a HOF-calliber player: good glove, hit for average and power, decent speed, good plate discipline. Nice guy, guitarist. The problem is (and stop me if you've heard this before), his talent is too broad: it's easier for us to appreciate a guy who does one thing well (Ryan Howard), than it is for us to appreciate guys who have a diverse set of skills.

Anyway, I probably should have considered Bernie. I didn't because his career started a few years before Posada, Jeter, and Rivera made the big club, and I thought it was cool that the three of them are still with the Yankees, and will be (I think) for at least another year.

But Bernie's a fine candidate for the MVP of the dynasty.
3:39 PM Jul 22nd
 
chuck
I second Evan's mention of Bernie Williams as another candidate. Here's a comparison of the three hitters.
Just addressing the clutch hitting issue...
The first line under each guy is their regular season stats minus those clutch stats available on the site here.
The next line combines those clutch stats with their postseason stats.

Jeter
avg / obp / slg / ops / iso
.315/.382/.459/.841/.144
.321/.390/.457/.847/.136
essentially the same look, though his clutch regular season stats are much better than the postseason stats- understandably, as the postseason pitching faced should be better than the aggregate clutch pitching faced.

Posada
avg / obp / slg / ops / iso
.275/.377/.476/.853/.202
.273/.382/.447/.829/.174
what this doesn't show you is that in the post-season he's been a somewhat different hitter: .236/.352/.379, losing 126 pts off his regular season stats. His very fine clutch regular season performance brings his second line back closer to normal, though still with a drop in power numbers.

Williams
avg / obp / slg / ops / iso
.295/.379/.476/.855/.180
.291/.387/.493/.881/.202
Like the other two, played a key defensive position. In the postseason, he lost points in batting avg, but made a lot of that ground back with increases in walks and power. His power numbers went up in both postseason and clutch areas. Very worth being in the discussion. I don't know how he does on warp-3 or wpa, but for win shares, I have him as the best player among these guys in 1996, '97, '02, and tied with Jeter in '98. Also best in '95, though not a fair comparison. In '99 he was only 2 win shares behind Jeter, and in '00 3 behind Posada.

12:36 PM Jul 22nd
 
Richie
Very good writing, Dave.

When people think 'Yankee Dynasty', they think of the 4 Series wins. So I'll go with Rivera as its MVP.
11:02 AM Jul 22nd
 
evanecurb
The MVP of the Yankee dynasty was the triumvirate of George Steinbrenner, the YES network, and the New York/NJ/CT SMSA (pop. 17 million). I always onsidered five home grown guys to be in the discusssion, with Pettitte and Bernie Williams serving as the other two. Remove any of these five from the team and they probably have fewer playoff appearances.

Rivera may be the tipping point, though, and therefore the most valuable. The blown saves in '01 against Arizona and '04 against Boston are the biggest strikes against him. Put him on the Braves starting in '95 and ATL, not the Yankees, may have been the team to win four world championships. Seems like Atlanta's bullpen postseason was always costing them a chance to advance.
10:27 AM Jul 22nd
 
ventboys
Good stuff, Dave, and I'm tickled to see more of your writing recently. I am a long time Yankee hater, and an almost rabid Jeter basher, but that is not to say that I think that he stinks. My own ranking all time at shortstop has him 3rd behind Wags and Arod, and Arod's move to third gives the captain an argument for the second spot. I generally think of him as the new Arky Vaughn, and Jeter has clear advantages over him to rank above him.

As far as defense, I've always been on board with the lousy shortstop designation, but I have one curiosity about his defensive numbers: Yankee stadium, old and new (it appears) are designed for offenses to funnel their hits to the other side of the bag, to rightfield. Is it possible that this has caused a unique "park effect" for Jeter? I'd be curious to see his road defensive numbers.
11:56 PM Jul 21st
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy