Remember me

Confessions of a Yankee Fan

November 12, 2009

Twenty-seven titles.

It's almost hard to fathom.  Some of us have only seen a fraction of them, dating back through what can only be called "The Steinbrenner Era."

I was three years old in 1977.  I wish I could tell you I have fond memories of that October, of Reggie Jackson in one of the few performances that can be put above what Hideki Matsui did in game six of the 2009 World Series.  All I have are vague memories of Reggie and of a baseball field swarmed by a pillaging crowd, ballplayers running for their lives to celebrate in the sanctuary of the clubhouse.

I was awestruck by the site of that crowd on my dinky little rabbit ear television.  Such mayhem, such reckless abandon, such lawlessness over the outcome of a sports game.

I was hooked.

Truth be told, that could have been 1977.  Or maybe it was 1976 when Chris Chambliss sent the rival Kansas City Royals home on one swing.

It doesn't matter what game it was. I was too young to perceive baseball beyond the most knee-jerk of reactions.  I lived and died with every play.  When Reggie made an out, I would immediately ask my dad when he would be up to bat again.

I didn't know Reggie and Thurman disliked each other.  I didn't care.  The greatest show on Earth, a three ring circus of Yankees, Dodgers, and the craziest crowd of people ever assembled outside of five cent beer night were showing every evening on my television.

As a kid, I don't think I ever understood why I loved baseball so much.  I never saw the Yankees win a World Series in the 1980s.  When they met the Dodgers again in 1981, my favorite player, Dave Winfield, went just 1 for 22 with five walks.  After looking so strong the first two games, the Yankees crumbled and lost in six.

I kept watching and the Yankees kept winning, although not enough to make the playoffs.  Then, Don Mattingly arrived and there was someone for me to latch onto.  I didn't totally get free agency or the concept of a homegrown player.  All I understood was this first baseman put the cool black lines under his eyes and seemed to get a hit in almost every at-bat.  And he seemed like a stand-up guy. 

By 1989, it became apparent that Mattingly's peak years had passed despite being just twenty-eight years old.  The Yankees' peak went with them.  They slipped below .500 and spent the four years trying to make their way back.

I'm sure this poor little sob story about a mere four years a frustration brings tears to your eyes.  It shouldn't, obviously.  The Yankees have managed to be a very successful franchise for an extended period of time, mostly because they have the resources to overcome even George Steinbrenner's decisions.  It's all been built on the concept he has beaten into our brains from the moment he bought the team: we are history, we are baseball, we are great.

That's been the interesting thing about writing about the Yankees and interacting with people on the internet.  Most non-Yankee fans believe all Yankee fans to be arrogant, greedy, loud-mouthed battery throwers with an over-inflated sense of entitlement.  We're all little versions of George Steinbrenner, more than happyto tell you about the greatness of the New York Yankees on a daily basis .

That's only partially true.

My biggest conflict in writing about the Yankees is answering the question, "why are you a Yankee fan?"  I try my best to write objectively about the Yankees and their relative place within the game.  I don't take delight in the Yankees financial advantage over the rest of baseball.  If anything, I'm bothered by it, too.

There's plenty of ways to rationalize it: What else should they do with the money?  Are they not entitled to make as much money as they can?  Would you rather the players make the money or the owners?  If more owners cared as much as the Steinbrenners, baseball would be a better game.

Maybe.  There comes a point, though, where it all gets a little embarrassing.

This winter, the Yankees spent a boatload of money on three players:  CC Sabathia, AJ Burnett, and Mark Teixeira.  I think we were all expecting the Yankees to sign Sabathia.  The Yankees lack of a true front of the rotation starter pretty much guaranteed that they were going to pay whatever price to get Sabathia in pinstripes.

Burnett was obviously overpaid, both in years and in dollars.

But Teixeira... That was the straw that broke the camel's back. 

When that signing was announced, I finally knew what it felt like to be one of those people in television commercials that gets a Lexus for Christmas.  Those commercials are completely absurd and incomprehensible to about 99% percent of the population and so was the signing of Teixeira.

Sure, the Yankees kept their payroll at the same level as 2008, even going eight million less than the previous season.  It's not as if they missed the playoffs and tacked another $20 million onto their budget.  That assumes, of course, that having a payroll 33% higher than the second largest payroll in baseball is reasonable, which it probably isn't.

As if dropping $240 million on pitching in the span of two weeks didn't ruffle any feathers, the Teixeira signing put the exclamation point on everything that people hate about the Yankees.  After weeks of dismissals by Brian Cashman, claiming the Yankees had no more money, somehow at the last moment he dug through the couch pillows, emptied out the coin jar and scraped together an extra $180 million to steal Teixeira away from the Red Sox.

As a fan, I was stunned.  I was embarrassed.  I started to feel like part of the problem.

Big new ballpark, costing over a billion dollars (which I don't like very much, by the way), three new players costing $50 million between them for 2009, and the scorn of a baseball world that actually started to value draft picks over Proven Veterans ©.

I relished in the empty seats behind and around home plate.  They deserve it, I thought, to be embarrassed on national television by Joe Buck for what they're charging for those seats, pushing long time ticket holders out in an effort to get corporations to spend more and more money.  They deserve to be held accountable for their greed and miscalculation of an economy in crisis while their crosstown counterparts build a family-friendly park with prices that are more reasonable.

But I still rooted for the Yankees.  Every walk-off win, I was excited.  Even Alex Rodriguez, who neither shocked nor surprised me with his admission in February, brought a smile to my face with his first home run of the season in Baltimore.  It wasn't a "fairytale," as Michael Kay blurted out in his melodramatic way, but it was exciting.

I rooted throughout the summer when they somehow closed the gap on their 0-8 record versus the Red Sox and went 11-4 in the postseason.  I can't help myself.  This team became a part of my life when my skull hadn't finished hardening yet.  They've been a part of my consciousness for as long as I can remember.

I got a little misty when the Yankees won the World Series in 1996.  I'll admit it.  I had never seen them win before, at least, not that I could remember.  It felt like the culmination of twenty plus years of work finally paying off.  No one expected them to win, especially after going down two games to love to the Atlanta Braves, who already seemed poised to become the team of the decade.  That was a team that everyone could root for, not because manager Joe Torre's brother Frank needed a heart or because their other brother Rocco died earlier in the year.  It was a team of youngsters, of farmhands producing on the major league level.

Not this year.  I was happy when the Yankees won the World Series this year, but I wasn't proud.  Not like 1996.  This was a team that dug itself out of last year's malaise with money.  All of the Yankee stereotypes came together in one season and brought home a championship for all the world to hate.

They may not always make me proud, but they're my team.  I can't change that now.  I can't bring myself to root for the Mets or adopt another team at this stage in my life.  I have too much invested in the Yankees, too much history, too much childhood, too much love.

We're not all bad, us Yankee fans.  You may not hear us on talk radio or read our comments on ESPN, but we're out there, and we know how you feel.

And trust me: we get it.

 

Scott Ham writes about the Yankees at The Bronx View.  Feel free to reach him via email.

 
 

COMMENTS (8 Comments, most recent shown first)

evanecurb
Hank:

I have been saying the same thing about expansion into NYC for years. Moving into an existing MLB city without the permission (never granted) of the existing teams in that market is prohibited under MLB rules, but I don't know exactly what the rule is or when it came to be.

Of course it would work. It would work extremely well. Northern New Jersey, Long Island, and Westchester/Southern Connecticut are all major league sized population centers with high income populations. Put a team in a nice ballpark in one of those areas and promote it properly. The Yankees would not really feel any effects until they began to slip in the standings, which I think is a real possibility in about two years due to the ages of so many of their key players.
11:17 PM Nov 23rd
 
ScottHam
Hank,
Thanks for reading.

I don't know much about baseball economics during the 50s and 60s, but it seems to me that the three team system failed in that era. The big push west certainly opened up financial opportunities that hadn't existed previously, but there was also less competition for the sports dollar.

I think a third team in NY would definitely impact the Yankees bottom line. The question would be whether a third team could take enough to sustain itself in that market. I'm not sure how much patience (and therefore financial support) New Yorkers would have for a middle market type team that would suffer greater ups and downs than the Yankees have had to endure.
6:00 PM Nov 20th
 
hankgillette
The problem with the Yankees is that they are the dominant team in a two-team market that had three teams for over fifty years. In a fair world, baseball would expand with two more New York teams, dividing the market and making the Yankees' revenue more in line with other teams. Since somehow, ownership of a team has also come to mean ownership of the market*, there will probably never be additional New York teams.

* When did this happen? The St. Louis Browns didn't seem to have any problem moving to Baltimore, but when MLB wanted to establish a Washington team again, they had to appease Baltimore owner Peter Angelos before they could put the team there.
12:57 PM Nov 20th
 
evanecurb
The Orioles have made some good personnel moves in recent years. They got both quantity and quality for Tejada and Bedard. (not sure who they got for Huff and Sherrill but I assume it was some sort of prospect.) Next steps should be to ditch Mora and trade Brian Roberts and Luke Scott for more prospects. None of this will help, though, unless they start doing a better job of drafting pitchers. One thing that will help the pitching is improving their defense. Izturis is very good at shortstop, and Jones has the potential to be good in center. Once you have a good defensive team, the most important thing becomes throwing low strikes. I think that strategy could work for them.
Tampa has drafted better than Baltimore, pure and simple. They have done a great job with all those high first round picks they had for years.
8:53 PM Nov 15th
 
ScottHam
Hey Evan,
Thanks for reading.

I really wish the Orioles could find a way to right the ship. It's a franchise with such a great history. Earl Weaver alone is enough personality and baseball acumen to satisfy an entire division all by himself.

I can't really wrap my head around why some ownership, like the Rays, can figure out how to compete in an unbalanced division while the Orioles can't seem to get out of their own way. When they were developing Bedard, it looked like they had discovered the fountain of cheap young pitching, which could have given them much more flexibility. Young pitching is never that easy, unfortunately.

I would love to see Baltimore become a powerhouse again. Watching them play the Yankees when both are in contention is always a thrill.

Thanks again.
12:02 PM Nov 15th
 
evanecurb
Scott:

As an Orioles fan and a Redskins fan, I have always loved to hate the Yankees and the Cowboys. It's nice when your favorite team's rival is the big bully on the block. Steinbrenner always made that easy for me. And when Jerry Jones bought the Cowboys and fired Tom Landry, it became more fun than ever to root against the Cowboys. The Red Sox, NY Giants, and Eagles are good rivals, but the Yankees and Cowboys are the best.

Now, if only the Orioles and Redskins could get rid of THEIR crappy, egotistical ownership.......
3:15 PM Nov 14th
 
ScottHam
Thanks, Richie. I never warned the powers that be that I was coming out of hibernation. I hope to post every other week or so during the off-season, assuming I have something worth sharing. I don't want to write just for the sake of cranking out content.

Thanks again.
3:43 PM Nov 13th
 
Richie
You need to advertise somewhere on the site that this new article is actually up. I no longer scroll down this way on anything like a regular basis, and I'm guessing the vast majority of BJO subscribers don't know it's even here.

Oh, and good stuff!
11:31 AM Nov 13th
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy