Remember me

Justin Morneau

August 1, 2008

            I recently had a friend of mine up and move to Minneapolis. A graduate student at College Park when I entered as a freshman, he recently completed his PhD in Political Theory, and has been teaching at various schools for the past 3-4 years. His wife took a judicial clerkship in the twinned city, and the two left Nashville (but not, as you would assume from the music, their dog, their job or their one true love) to brave the great white north. If Justin Morneau is any indication of what happens there, each of my friends will contribute solidly to their professions, winning a few awards for their performance, but routinely getting overshadowed by flashier (though sometimes less steady) compatriots and competitors. People will ask me how they are doing, and I will confidently answer, “Well, quite well;” I won’t know exactly how well, or what constitutes “well,” but I know it will be so.

            When Morneau lumbered down the line and slid in ahead of the tag to end the 2008 All-Star game just short of the J.D. Drew-David Wright pitching matchup (TO DECIDE HOME FIELD ADVANTAGE IN THE WORLD SERIES!!! THE ALL-STAR GAME ON FOX!!!), it finished up a pretty successful 31 hours for the Twin first baseman. Of course, one week later, he was back to semi-obscurity, a footnote twice over. Drew was the game’s MVP (deservedly) and Josh Hamilton (doubly so) was the story of the Home Run Derby, as well as the Break as a whole.

            Morneau is not a great player, not even in the discussion of the top ten or fifteen best position players in the league. Maybe not even top 5 at his own position, depending on how you classify DHs. Still, he produces. One could go to battle with a team of Morneaus and feel pretty confident. Of course, they would have to be different sizes and have varying different skill sets and overcome the Canadian aversion to combat, but you get the point. His average line is something in the arena of .290/.360/.510, with some upshot from there over the next few years. That’s a very useful piece to have, especially if the package comes with a smile and a demurring personality. You don’t build around it (is there a first baseman other than Pujols that a team would build around?), but you also don’t worry about it.

            I started this piece with the idea of writing about how unlucky and overshadowed Morneau has been. He was the MVP in 2006, a year in which he did not even make the All-Star game, because his second half explosion catapulted the Twins to the playoffs. Still, all the talk was about how God Derek Jeter had been denied his rightful honor. Or whether David Ortiz’s superior offensive season should have been enough to overcome his team’s third place finish and the DH stigma.  

            On his own team, Morneau has been overshadowed, at various times, by his fellow M&M boy and two absolutely filthy lefties. Mauer gets old scouts and young statters alike hot under the collar, while Santana dominated the league for years and Liriano was no small part of that 2006 surge. Yet, Santana is gone, Mauer has played enough to qualify for the batting title exactly once (although he also managed to win it that year), and Liriano is currently dominating AAA batters after Tommy John surgery and an aborted attempt at an early comeback. Morneau played 157 games each of the last two seasons, and is on pace for more than that this year. He is, as James Earl Jones would say in his perfectly grave voice, “the one constant through the years.”

            His All-Star experience was nearly identical. Hamilton set the stadium and the country ablaze with a 32 dinger binge in the first round of the Home Run Derby and a story that everyone really wants to believe in.* Morneau hit 8. In the pointless second round, Hamilton took a few swings to stay warm, swatting 4 more homeruns before sitting and waiting for the final. Morneau hit 9, giving him less than half of Hamilton’s total in 150% of the outs, but a spot in the final anyway. With both men tired (Hamilton likely from 50+ swings, Morneau likely from sitting around for four hours), the final was an unspectacular 5-3 win for Morneau. Everyone in the stadium seemed disappointed (hell, even Morneau admitted that Hamilton should have won), and the obligatory trophy presentation was marked by not one, but TWO separate mispronunciations of Morneau’s very easily pronounced name.

            The next night saw Morneau go 2-4 with a double and 2 runs scored. One of those runs was scored on Drew’s seventh-inning two-run shot, ensuring that Morneau’s contribution to the win would be overlooked once again. And so it goes.

            The more I look into him, though, I think that maybe everything balances out. Hundreds of major leaguers would give most anything to achieve to Morneau’s level, recognized or not. And maybe he didn’t deserve the MVP in 2006, and maybe this year’s totals are inflated by a somewhat inexplicable rate of batters in scoring position.** Lots of maybes, and maybe it’s better not to consider a guy making millions of dollars underrated or underappreciated. The terms themselves are unclear…after all, Morneau did win the 2006 MVP award, voted to victory by baseball writers who apparently appreciated his efforts just fine, thanks. His name is on the books, which will likely live far longer than the arguments that it is there undeservedly. Especially if the Twins keep winning against most odds, and the record book reads Morneau, Rodriguez, Morneau.

            There are many worse players who will make more money, get more national recognition and, as such, be remembered “better” than Morneau. There will also be a fair amount of better players who will never even sniff an MVP award and generally miss out on history’s embrace. It’s a sliding scale that’s the same in nearly every profession. There are worse places to be than where Morneau is, and I’m pretty sure my friends in Minneapolis would gladly take the respective spot on their profession’s scale. So , even after all of the statistical analysis in the world, and with all the soft capital stuff like personality and awards-voting/awards-decrying, the best I can do with Morneau is that he is doing well, quite well. I’m not exactly sure how well, but I am sure that he is doing well.

 

* The story is great, but it quickly became THE story, and one unbalanced by a second side. Yes, Hamilton has come a long way in his quest to finally reach his immense potential, and good for him. But he also spent a few years destroying himself, his talent and everyone around him. There are quite a few examples of players with half of Hamilton’s natural abilities who have made All-Star teams through hard work and abstention from vices, or players with his level of talent who simply were not able to beat back the demons as successfully as he seems to have. Those stories are as important, if not more so. As the narrative currently exists, however, I feel like I should be ashamed to even have included the word “binge” in the referenced sentence. 

** Seriously, I have almost no explanation how the cleanup hitter for a team that routinely sends up Out Machines like Carlos Gomez and Nick Punto ahead of him leads the league in those kind of chances. Morneau has come up 260 times with guys on base, first in the league. In those trips, there have been 350 guys on base, first in the AL until Big Tex crossed over, and third overall. I guess Casilla has been better than I knew (although that seems to be done for the season) and Mauer is really, really good at getting on base, but the Twins leadoff hitters are getting on 28.5% of the time…that’s worse than the BATTING AVERAGES of most leadoff hitters in the league. Crazy.

 
 

COMMENTS (10 Comments, most recent shown first)

jollydodger
Poor small-market stars. Millionaire athletes without the media scrutiny. Poor guys.
1:10 AM Aug 10th
 
tangotiger
Sean you are a prince among men. I appreciate you taking the time from seeing the line from a different perspective and agree with your post. Obviously we all have our biases when reading (and writing), and when I read that line, it screamed that out from my perspective, even if you barely whispered it from your perspective. Thanks again...
4:04 PM Aug 6th
 
stewartjk1
I have always liked Justin Morneau but every time I hear his name I think of Zoilo Versalles :) .... Personally, I really liked Hafner in 2006. Kind of ashamed to admit that now. It's interesting how a guy age 30 (in his mid-prime) can forget to hit, coincidentally at the same times as MLB cracks down on steroids.
2:51 PM Aug 6th
 
demedici
Tango -

I for one don't have any problem with your reaction, or your means of calling me out for it. That's part of the reason we have a comments section. I take whatever respsonsibility is required for my jokes offending people. I won't be changing my style of writing, and in this particular case, I think you got me wrong and are looking at it from a skewed (and somewhat ironic) angle (discussed below), but still I am sorry that you were offended. I actually find your story and lesson derived therefrom a bit horrifying, but that is also for another time.

The joke was, simply, "Canadians are known for being peaceful and a team of Morneaus (being Canadian) would need to overcome their peaceful nature to be led into combat." As you point out, I am a white American male. I also happened to go to college and get an advanced degree, and live on the east coast. My other writing, hopefully, suggests a sense of bemusement with the world. All of these things, at least in the way in which I view how they look to outsiders, suggests that maybe I LIKE peaceful people, and maybe I don't think an "aversion to combat" is such a bad thing to have. In short, maybe I'm a hippie liberal d-bag. So when the joke is attacked from the "You are disrespecting Canadians, a noble breed of warriors" angle, simultaneously with the "Americans are war-hungry barbarians" comparison, I can't help but feel someone missed something along the way. Very possibly that person is me. Maybe I should have known that Canadians are sick of being seen as circumspect about war and combat, though I'm not sure how that would make the rounds.

All the same, please accept my non-apologetic-sounding apology. I accept that I offended you in some fashion. I probably should have just made a Patrick Roy joke there anyway, given that he's Morneau's hero and in no way averse to combat.
2:46 PM Aug 6th
 
tangotiger
Since my comments are being addressed...

Inappropriate throwaway joke hitting tender spot = no need to post my reaction in a place that solicits reaction. Got it.

How about Bill's inappropriate joke about Polish people that lasted longer than a throwaway joke? Reaction permitted?

In my view, if someone tells a joke, however throwaway, then the reaction to that joke, good or bad, is what the teller of the joke has to put up with. There are very few people who know how to tell a good ethnic or cultural joke and get away with it.

At my kid's school, we had a "big headed daddy" activity, where your kid draws a picture of you, all the kids hang their pictures up, and each daddy, in turn, tries to figure out which one is himself. There was one black daddy. When it was his turn, and it was plain obvious which one was him, all of us did not say a word. If we were all buddies, then of course, we'd be laughing like crazy about it. But, there's no way any of us could have gotten away with making any kind of joke (kids or not kids present). When the majority makes fun or takes advantage of the minority, take greater care. White American males poking fun at a smaller group is hardly ever a good idea. Unless you are Don Rickles.

*My* recommendation back is not to try to joke about it in the first place.
11:31 AM Aug 6th
 
Richie
Note to Sean: Please make further jokes, even if they'll never be as funny as mine are. Note to Tango: The context of the article was baseball, not combat. If someone else's joke happens to hit a tender spot, well, just maybe possibly it might have been an inappropriate joke. Nevertheless doesn't change it from an obviously throw-away joke line to some supposedly serious-intended proposition. No matter how tender the spot is.
4:21 PM Aug 4th
 
demedici
Note to self: never make jokes again, or seeing Canadians as peaceful.
4:59 PM Aug 2nd
 
tangotiger
Yes, aversion to violence might be better, but the context of the article was specifically about combat, about facing up to a fighting situation. In the hockey world, no one would think that Canadians are averse to physical play or fighting situation. And while Russians don't fight in hockey, they may do more than their fair share in the true battlefield. The entire analogy is simply suspect and really has no bearing.
12:04 PM Aug 2nd
 
Richie
Canadians are weenies. And if you don't like that, you know where I am!

Oh, you don't know where I am? Well, how about that.

Seriously, OK if we replace that with a "Canadian aversion to violence"? I do believe that one is accurate, relatively speaking. I believe Tango's basically right, in that our frozen neighbors have pitched in war-fighting-wise more often than not.
11:19 AM Aug 2nd
 
tangotiger
Canadian aversion to combat, eh? Like these guys?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Forces_casualties_in_Afghanistan

Canadians have an aversion to fighting in fabricated wars, not just wars. Why not say "aversion to shooting first and asking questions later?". Really, both sides can paint an incomplete picture, so why start it at all to begin with?
10:14 AM Aug 2nd
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy