Remember me

Underappreciated

October 13, 2008

One of man's greatest pastimes is looking into the future. Who's going to win the game tomorrow? Who's going to finish first? Who's going to win the presidential election?

 

Sometimes, when I look into the future, I look a generation ahead. That's when I see Alex Rodriguez, a man loved and at peace.

 

I'm not a Yankees fan. But for some reason, I feel sorry for A-Rod. Here's a guy who hasn't hit under .285 in 13 seasons as a regular, and hasn't hit fewer than 35 home runs in a season since Bill Clinton was president. His on-base percentage has been .375 or better for nine straight years. He's durable, and he has won three MVP awards.

 

But with Alex Rodriguez, a great many people want to focus on what he is not. He's not clutch. He's not a team player. He doesn't earn his money. He's not a winner.

 

It's an accident of history that he is viewed this way. Ernie Banks never led his team to a World Series title either, even though the Cubs also had Billy Williams in their lineup and a Hall of Famer making one-fourth of their starts.

 

For this, Ernie Banks is a tragic hero. People love Ernie Banks. Poor Ernie.

 

Alex Rodriguez was the American League's Gold Glove winner at shortstop in 2002 and 2003. When he moved on to the Yankees, he also moved to third base. To the best of my knowledge, he has never made a big stink about this publicly.

 

Pete Rose did the same kind of thing in 1975, and Craig Biggio did much the same thing a generation later. The Reds needed a third baseman, Rose moved over, and was lauded as a fantastic, selfless team player when the Reds won back-to-back World Series.

 

When the Astros needed a center fielder, Biggio volunteered to play there. "That's Craig Biggio," people said. "He'll do whatever he can to help the team."

 

A-Rod has also been vilified for a couple of sneaky, underhanded plays. He yelled out so a Toronto fielder would drop the ball. Sorry Alex. Good play, wrong generation. People didn't call it a smart play to save an out. People called it a dirty trick from that overpaid choke artist.

 

Rodriguez also tried to slap the ball away from Red Sox pitcher Bronson Arroyo in a key playoff game. It was unquestionably a good play. If the umpire hadn't seen it, that play turns the game around. The Yankees had nothing to lose when he did that, and they didn't lose a thing.

 

Reggie Jackson did the same sort of thing, sticking his leg in the way of a throw in a World Series game. This was also a sneaky, underhanded play, but Reggie got away with it.

 

Alex Rodriguez once saved a kid's life, for crying out loud. No kidding. A-Rod almost got hit by a truck while making sure an 8-year-old boy didn't. He didn't stick around to make sure he got publicity for being a hero, and he didn't. None of the media even asked A-Rod about it until two days later. By then, everyone was already talking about how Gary Sheffield pushed some bozo Red Sox fan during a game.

 

Using the baseball-reference.com Play Index, I got a list of players who hit .315 with 50 home runs in one season.

 

(<http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/fb7g>) It's a bunch of historic seasons, mixed with players who have a swagger, a presence. Rodriguez did it in 2001, when he hit .318 with 52 homers. The same year, Barry Bonds hit .328 with 73, Sammy Sosa hit .328 with 64 and Luis Gonzalez hit .325 with 57. Sorry A-Rod, bad timing.

 

I'm not sure why some players are loved and others aren't. Joe DiMaggio was, frankly, a pompous jackass who reportedly insisted on being called "The Greatest Living Ballplayer," even though this was at the very least, open to argument.

 

Mickey Mantle was a drunk and a lousy husband. But you never saw a huge front-page photo of him with another woman when he was playing. When Mantle admitted shortly before his death that he was also a bad father, somehow this made him more admirable.

 

I'm not sure that any of us truly can understand the pressures of being a Major League Baseball player. Take a full-time player on a playoff team. The last time he had two honest-to-goodness days off in a row was at the All-Star Break. The last time before that was probably January or February. It would drive me nuts just to think about that, not to mention trying to live up to a multi-million dollar contract.

 

Speaking of that contract...fellow writer Roel Torres pointed out in the comments section that fans expect more from A-Rod because he has the title of the highest-paid player in the game.

 

Roel is right. A-Rod has been vilified because of that contract. When Kirby Puckett was elected to the Hall of Fame, he made a point of saying how the honor meant so much because it wasn't something you could buy. "Alex Rodriguez can't get in here with his $250 million contract," Kirby said.

 

Alex Rodriguez made $28 million this year. I'm not sure where that would rank among the highest-paid movie stars from June 2007 to June 2008, but I know it's not in the top 10.

 

Will Smith made $80 million during that time period. Johnny Depp, who stars in a series of movies my fiancee gave up trying to get me to watch, took in $72 million.

 

Eddie Murphy and Mike Myers each made $55 million over those 12 months. I wouldn't watch either of their movies if you bought me dinner and paid for my ticket.

 

All of those people made twice as much as A-Rod, or more. Most people know that A-Rod makes great gobs of money. Did any of you know how much Mike freaking Myers made in one year? Why don't more people know how much actors and actresses make? Why aren't they the object of such hatred?

 

My father will complain sometimes about the over-the-top money given to today's athletes. Whenever he does and I'm around, I always say, "Dad, if someone offered you that much money, would you turn it down because you thought it was too much?" He always says something like, "Hell, no."

 

Of course he wouldn't. Hardly any of us would. If someone offered me $28 million for the next 12 months, I'd ask where I sign and figure out what I had to do later.

 

Some people will never accept that there will always be someone who has a bigger paycheck, a nicer house, a better-looking spouse, a flatter stomach and fewer gray hairs. Alex Rodriguez is someone who, on the outisde, appears to have more of everything than you or I. Some people are bitter about that, and can't wait to see him fall.

 

As we get older, we tend to realize, with a chuckle and a shake of the head, the mistakes of our youth. People hated Muhammad Ali because he didn't represent the "Keep your mouth shut, do your job and fight for your country" attitude the nation had come to expect from its sports heroes. People hated Roger Maris because he wasn't the guy who people thought should break Babe Ruth's record. People hated Hank Aaron because he wasn't white. People hated Ted Williams because he didn't kiss anyone's butt.

 

I know most of you have already made up your mind about A-Rod, but people learned from those mistakes. Hopefully, they'll do the same with Alex Rodriguez.

 

Matt DiFilippo welcomes e-mails at allthings222@fastmail.fm.

 
 

COMMENTS (11 Comments, most recent shown first)

burtshulman
Well said all the way, Matt. Even in light of the steroids issue and the Torre hatchet job that came out after you wrote this piece. First, let's talk about the 'roids thing. A-Rod refused to get involved in naming any other names. He went on ESPN and publicly explained himself and apologized -- and I believed every word of it. And may I ask all the self-righteous fans (and hypocritical former ballplayers starting with Frank Robinson) who vilify A-Rod and Bonds: are you telling us that given the pressures and the competitiveness and the availability and MLB's looking the other way and your peers blasting more home runs than you, you're telling me that you wouldn't have used 'roids in that era? Come on! Ruth would have, Ted Williams would have, Ty Cobb would have (he'd have started a business manufacturing them) -- the list goes on and on. Give us all a break -- especially A-Rod and Bonds. And let's examine the criticism against A-Rod as a ballplayer. Torre writes a book in which he accuses him (accuses him?) of wanting desperately to be liked. The guy's insecure! Criminal, eh Joe? How about "mildly annoying, but look at the size of his contribution!" How does someone as massively gifted as A-Rod -- a real baseball genius -- overcome the inevitable jealousy of his peers, both for his playing achievements and for his salary? The fact that he cares about what they think isn't a huge plus? Nope. He's supposed to be laconic and self-contained. He's a narcissist? Oh -- and, uh, Joe, you're not?? And you really, truly think Jeter isn't? Jeter's cold, unemotional stoicism is vastly preferable to A-Rod's emotionally alive, personally sensitive, perhaps even needy nature? Not to me, buddy. His marriage goes sour and he has an affair with Madonna, and even that's cause for criticism? Are you seriously telling me that we're all supposed to hate the guy because his marriage broke up and he consoled himself by sleeping with an aging but still-beautiful sex goddess? What idiot out there who's heterosexual and has been involved in a messy break-up wouldn't do the same -- if he could? Well guess what -- A-Rod can and you and I can't! Tough life, boys; let's hate him for it. We're a species that tends to operate like sheep. I don't know the dude, but let's say A-Rod is tone-deaf when it comes to making friends. Maybe he's socially inept. Maybe he's not a wit, or a smart talker. Maybe he tries too hard to be liked. Maybe -- are you listening Torre? -- maybe he's not macho (and for that I say thank god). And maybe the one area in which he can't handle the absurd pressures placed on him by his fans and his peers due to the size of his gifts and his salary is that in certain post-season clutch situations he hasn't gotten the big hit. But don't try telling me that a guy who has over 100 RBI's for 11 straight seasons, including 156 two years ago, isn't clutch -- once again, what are those idiots talking about?? The guy plays his heart out, practices endlessly, does all he can to maximize the talent he was born with, and tries really, really hard to connect with his teammates, regardless of some possibly irritating personality quirks. For this he takes endless abuse from all sides, and yet somehow still manages to trot onto the field and focuse that massive talent with the kind of joy and concentration his teammates and the rest of us can only dream about. The man is a remarkable, remarkable human being, possessing depths of athletic courage and strength the rest of us should be marvelling at. This is the Age of A-Rod. Can we all please, please start savoring it before he's gone? Look at Bonds -- long before steroids people hated him, a player of similar talent. But it was mostly the sportswriters he wouldn't talk to, furious because he wouldn't give them their stories. So they wrote that he was surly (though his friends denied it) and America believed them. Who writes about how surly so many sportswriters are?? Now we "hate" A-Rod -- why? Because he's not surly, because he wants us to love him, because that makes him too human. We blew off the Age of Barry (with or without 'roids, the dude did so many amazing things all over the field and won 7 MVP's!!!) Here's my plea: let's not waste the final great years of the Age of A-Rod (assuming the hip recovers) by giving him a hard time about things none of us has any right to comment on. Instead, why don't we just revel in the man's genius while we still can?
2:32 PM Apr 14th
 
jollydodger
I have never liked the Yankees, being a Dodgers fan. But the A-Rod thing in NY makes me dislike Yankees fans even more. He's better than Jeter in every metric you could invent, yet they don't accept A-Rod. I'm no A-Rod fan, either...but all he does is produce.
8:51 AM Mar 28th
 
MattDiFilippo
Evan,

I think Mike Schmidt is an excellent parallel to A-Rod. The team's not winning the World Series, he's the most visible player and he's supposed to carry the team, so it must be his fault. Schmidt got a reprieve when the Phillies won the 1980 Series, but then they got on his case again when he didn't hit in the '83 series.

I like your idea about assuming everyone used steroids except for Kruk and Gwynn. Kind of like cocaine in the 80s.
1:07 PM Oct 17th
 
evanecurb
I stand corrected on the Williams thing. But unlike A Rod, Williams' ability was not underappreciated while he was still playing. The closest parallel I can think of to A Rod was Mike Schmidt, pre-1980 in Philly. Phillie fans said similar things about Schmidt as present day Yanks fans say about A Rod, then the Phils won it all and I guess all was forgiven.

With respect to the matter of whether A Rod was/is juicing or not, let's just assume that everyone in the 90s used PEDs except Tony Gwynn and John Kruk. That is a whole lot easier than trying to figure out who did and who didn't. I am glad that MLB has now made a good faith attempt to banish PEDs from the game, but we should not be surprised that many players utilized them pre-2005 when there were no adverse consequences (other than the obvious health risks) imposed for their use.
10:13 AM Oct 16th
 
MattDiFilippo
Okay, I remember that now. Thanks for the correction on that.
7:51 PM Oct 15th
 
Richie
ARod has been linked to steroid use. By Canseco. Who's both a clown and been accurate about enough players so far that he fairly counts as a link.
6:35 PM Oct 15th
 
MattDiFilippo
Evan,

Thanks for writing. I really wonder if he'll get more respect by setting the all-time RBI record. My guess is he will if he's won a title by then. There is a chance he could become sort of a tragic figure if he plays for a very long time without a title. I think he'd have to leave New York for that to happen, though.

I do think there were a good number of fans who hated Williams because they were influenced by the media. Williams said the closest he ever came to tipping his cap to the fans was when a friend suggested he tip his cap and yell out, "Go to hell, you no good sons of bitches!"

Aaron, I agree, it was a group of racists who hated him.

Richie,

That's a great point about Jeter vs. A-Rod. A lot of fans feel Jeter is a great player because he's "a winner." It's kind of like with Jason Varitek right now. Varitek is having a horrible postseason -- key passed balls, he's not hitting at all, and he's handling a pitching staff that's getting its brains beat in. But people don't blame Varitek for the Red Sox predicament. Like Jeter, he's THE CAPTAIN.

Chisox,

Thanks for the kind words. I'm also mystified as to why he is the subject of so much hatred. He's never been linked to steroid use, to my knowledge. It kind of reminds me of Red Sox fans with Roger Clemens. One of the greatest pitchers of all time was right in front of them, and it was another case of hating a player for what he wasn't.

Roel,

You've hit on a very good point. I'm going to add something to the article to address that it's kind of silly for sports fans to think in those terms.
12:16 PM Oct 15th
 
RoelTorres
Hi Matt,

I think that the determining factor was the $252 million dollar contract he signed. That was like wearing a big target on his chest. When you become identified as the best compensated player in the game, then people respond with proportional/outsized expectations.

If A-Rod did all of this on a major league minimum salary, people would be in awe. But the contract separated him from the rest of the players in the public consciousness. For $252 million, they want him to be able to do everything -- including single-handedly win championships, and "perform in the clutch."
11:35 AM Oct 15th
 
chisox
Good article.....The negative press about him makes no sense to me. We'll take him in a White Sox uni any day.
12:09 PM Oct 14th
 
Richie
Fans of his time absolutely did NOT like Teddy Ballgame. He didn't give a crap about the fans, as was noted by a number of his own teammates. He didn't get any special credit for his war service from a generation so many of whom had likewise themselves served.

Some of the bile for ARod stems from his contract. But much of it comes from Yankee fans. I have one friend who absolutely detests ARod, and he's a lifelong Yankee fan.

Yankee fans smugly 'knew' Jeter was actually a better player than ARod. The fact that all the rest of us yahoos saw this as pretty darn funny just confirmed those fans in their self-assigned fan superiority. Confirmed that Yankee fans were smarter than the rest of us. The last thing they wanted was the two side-by-side, where the clearly better ARod could be compared to the sainted Jeter. Only his otherwise going to the dreaded Red Sox made the fans OK with the trade.

I don't know that any player can be liked without his own fans pitching in. Only way that happens for ARod is if the Yankees win a World Series with him massively outplaying Jeter. (otherwise they'll credit ARod's play to Jeter being a leader and taking the pressure off him)

Not that ARod should care about his baseball reputation, but to the extent that it does matter to him, he should've left the Yankees last winter.
11:41 AM Oct 14th
 
evanecurb
Matt:

Well said regarding A Rod. He is probably going to break Bonds' HR record and may also become the all time RBI champ. Wouldn't it be ironic if this "non clutch" player became the all time leader in RBI? One word of caution. Your last paragraph contains generalizations about Williams and Aaron, not all of which would stand up to scrutiny. The vast majority of baseball fans in 1974 liked Hank Aaron and were rooting for him to break the Babe's record. Saying that people hated him is giving too much credence to a few racist extremists. I would guess that 90% of fans at the time wanted him to break the record. With respect to Williams, I think his biggest problems were with a handful of writers in Boston, not with the majority of baseball fans. I think people LIKED him because he refused to kiss anyone's ass. Agree with you about Maris and Ali.
10:43 AM Oct 14th
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy