Remember me

How to fix the 2009 Pittsburgh Pirates in One Easy Step

November 20, 2008

I’ve been spending a lot of time thinking about the Pittsburgh Pirates recently.  Too much time, to be honest.  But they fascinate me. 

 

As a franchise, they have currently tied the professional sports record for most consecutive losing seasons in a row.  No other franchise in the history of MLB, the NFL, the NBA, or the NHL has had more losing seasons in a row.  Not the pathetic Tampa Bay Buccaneers of the seventies, or the hapless Los Angeles Clippers basketball teams of the eighties, or the comical expansion New York Mets of the sixties, or…  well, any other team you can think of, really.  Right now, they have tied the MLB record set by the Philadelphia Phillies, with sixteen consecutive losing seasons.  Next year, if they finish below .500 again, they can hold the all-time, all-sports record all by themselves.  That’s really not the kind of honor you want to lock down. 

 

They ended the year 2008 with a 67-95 record, finishing a mere 30.5 games back of the Cubs in the division.  In 2007, they were 68-94.  In 2006, they were 67-95.  In 2005, they were 67-95.  Perhaps you sense a trend there.  To make things worse, they traded a group of their best players last year.  Damaso Marte got traded.  Xavier Nady got traded.  Jason Bay got traded.  As the icing on the cake, their farm system looks pretty bleak.  Ummm…  Not looking good.

 

At this point, here is how the Pirates are shaping up for 2009, with their 2008 season Win Shares listed in the far right column:

 

 

LINEUP

WS

C

Ryan Doumit

20

1B

Adam LaRoche

16

2B

Freddy Sanchez

11

3B

Andy LaRoche

1

SS

Jack Wilson

7

LF

Nyjer Morgan

3

CF

Nate McLouth

24

RF

Brandon Moss

3

 

STARTERS

 

SP1

Tom Gorzelanny

0

SP2

Ian Snell

2

SP3

Paul Maholm

9

SP4

Zach Duke

3

SP5

Jeff Karstens

1

 

RELIEVERS

 

RP1

Matt Capps

7

RP2

John Grabow

6

RP3

Tyler Yates

3

RP4

Denny Bautista

1

 

WIN SHARES 08

117

 

 

117 Win Shares translates to about 39 total team victories.  Quite frankly, that doesn’t look like the team that’s going to break the streak.  No.  Instead, that looks like a team that might smash the record for consecutive losing seasons and put it out of reach at DiMaggio-like levels for generations to come.  That team looks like it might be on the short end of the stick for years and years to come.

 

But all is not lost.  There is hope.  There is opportunity.  I have a proposal on how to salvage the pride and legacy of the struggling Pirates franchise.  As proposals go, it’s a pretty simple strategic plan.  It consists of only one step.  Are you ready?  Here it comes:

 

Step One:

Spend some money, go out and sign some free agents.

 

And…  That’s it. 

 

That’s all there is to it.

 

Uh, yeah.  I told you it was a simple plan.

 

Here’s why it’s a good idea: due to the recent national economic upheaval, it’s a depressed market.  As a league-wide phenomenon, teams are cutting back on their budgets, cutting back on their spending, and they are reluctant to shell out for big, guaranteed, long-term, free agent contracts.  In today’s economic climate, there’s an opportunity for bargains.  Don’t forget, the primary lesson of the Moneyball era is not that you want to have a high OBP team – the primary lesson is that you want to take advantage of market inefficiencies.

 

In addition, if you sign free agents, you don’t have to trade away any of the precious few prospects in the system needed in order to revive the franchise in the short-term future.  You can create immediate results, without mortgaging the future of the franchise.

 

Signing quality, big-name free agents is the quickest way to reverse the fortunes of a team.  And when you have spent sixteen consecutive seasons clawing frantically to stay out of the division cellar, I think it becomes obvious that something radical needs to be done.

 

Here’s one possible scenario.  Let’s say, for example, that the Pirates go out and sign Mark Teixeira, Orlando Hudson, Rafael Furcal, Manny Ramirez, Bobby Abreu, CC Sabathia, Ben Sheets, AJ Burnett, Derek Lowe, Ryan Dempster, Francisco Rodriguez, Kerry Wood, Brian Fuentes, and Brandon Lyon.  Take a look at how that team would shape up:

 

 

LINEUP

WS

C

Ryan Doumit

20

1B

Mark Teixeira

28

2B

Orlando Hudson

17

3B

Casey Blake

18

SS

Rafael Furcal

8

LF

Manny Ramirez

31

CF

Nate McLouth

24

RF

Bobby Abreu

22

 

STARTERS

 

SP1

CC Sabathia

23

SP2

Ben Sheets

15

SP3

AJ Burnett

14

SP4

Derek Lowe

16

SP5

Ryan Dempster

18

 

RELIEVERS

 

RP1

Francisco Rodriguez

16

RP2

Kerry Wood

12

RP3

Brian Fuentes

12

RP4

Brandon Lyon

6

 

WIN SHARES 08

300

 

I feel like these changes would help improve the team and give them a chance to be competitive.  The pitching in particular looks really good, and even if Burnett and Sheets experience some of the health problems that have plagued them in the past, the rotation has enough depth, and the bullpen is strong enough to cover up any short-term adversity.  Plus, adding players like Furcal, Hudson, and Teixeira would really shore up the infield defense, giving the staff the confidence to throw more strikes and put more balls in play.

 

Let’s compare those two possible 2009 Pirates teams side by side:

 

OLD

LINEUP

WS

NEW

LINEUP

WS

C

Ryan Doumit

20

C

Ryan Doumit

20

1B

Adam LaRoche

16

1B

Mark Teixeira

28

2B

Freddy Sanchez

11

2B

Orlando Hudson

17

3B

Andy LaRoche

1

3B

Casey Blake

18

SS

Jack Wilson

7

SS

Rafael Furcal

8

LF

Nyjer Morgan

3

LF

Manny Ramirez

31

CF

Nate McLouth

24

CF

Nate McLouth

24

RF

Brandon Moss

3

RF

Bobby Abreu

22

 

STARTERS

 

 

STARTERS

 

SP1

Tom Gorzelanny

0

SP1

CC Sabathia

23

SP2

Ian Snell

2

SP2

Ben Sheets

15

SP3

Paul Maholm

9

SP3

AJ Burnett

14

SP4

Zach Duke

3

SP4

Derek Lowe

16

SP5

Jeff Karstens

1

SP5

Ryan Dempster

18

 

RELIEVERS

 

 

RELIEVERS

 

RP1

Matt Capps

7

RP1

Francisco Rodriguez

16

RP2

John Grabow

6

RP2

Kerry Wood

12

RP3

Tyler Yates

3

RP3

Brian Fuentes

12

RP4

Denny Bautista

1

RP4

Brandon Lyon

6

 

WIN SHARES 08

117

 

WIN SHARES 08

300

 

Even at a quick glance, you can tell that the new roster seems decidedly stronger.  The team has better balance, superior hitting, and excellent pitching in both the rotation and out of the pen.  Even though there isn’t any improvement at catcher or center field, I don’t see any realistic way to upgrade at those positions in this year’s free agent market so it seems sensible to let the incumbents, Doumit and McLouth, keep their spots.  In all fairness, they were pretty decent contributors last year (plus McLouth did win a Gold Glove in 2008.)  Taking a look at the numbers, there’s a difference of 183 Win Shares between the two squads, which translates to +61 team victories.  Last year, Pittsburgh won 67 games.  If they improve by +61 wins, they would project to 128 wins in the regular season.  This would comfortably insure a .500 record, and help snap their record-breaking losing slide.

 

Finally, another positive development from signing guys like Ryan Dempster and Kerry Wood is that they would deprive the Cubs of their services, giving the Pirates an opportunity to improve while also damaging the prospects of the current divisional kingpins.

 

 

 

 

 

If you have any thoughts you want to share, I would love to hear from you.  I can be contacted at roeltorres@post.harvard.edu.  Thank you.

 
 

COMMENTS (32 Comments, most recent shown first)

RoelTorres
Hi folks.

Something weird happened here, and I think I did a poor job managing it. Which is my fault. But live and learn.

Uh, yeah, I guess the proposal is completely insane. But it was meant to be so completely over the top, that it would be amusing. Well, that was the idea. I don't know. Sometimes the things I find amusing don't fly with everyone.

Superdude and Jollydodger and evanecurb seemed to get in the spirit of things with the original comments. Superdude said my plan was "practically a sure thing." Jollydodger wanted a salary estimate. And evanecurb just rolled with the whole premise and contributed several posts that entertained me. Then things got away from me, and people started questioning my fundamental understanding of baseball economics. Oops.

I guess that the risk you take when you act oblivious is that you can actually come across as oblivious. Which is fine. I sort of got a chuckle at the notion that the Pirates should sign every single free agent, and tried to present it in a deadpan manner. It was worth a shot.

Yes, PHWjort, dtoddwin, and ventboys -- I concede that the idea was insane. True, true, true. I guess I wanted to write an silly, insane essay. But I certainly didn't want to upset the readers along the way. My fault. Poorly played on my part.

Note to self: do not write about cagefighting, and do not make insane proposals. Much like Jason Varitek's batting line at the start of each game, I am now 0-for-2 with that approach. Dammit. Yay, me!
7:58 PM Dec 30th
 
PHjort
"Hi PWHjort,

"This is quite possibly the most insane proposal I've ever heard..."

No, it isn't."

The only reason you don't think it is insane is because it's your proposal. Actually, it isn't your proposal at all, it's Jim Bakers. Nonetheless, why would it work? It wouldn't work at all. It'd be a nice idea if it could happen, but it can't. Convincing 15 top free agents to sign 1-year deals is where this article dies. Funny, you don't seem to include that part.
7:29 PM Dec 27th
 
ventboys
This is thinking outside the box, certainly, in an insane way. A couple of points:

These guys don't sign one year contracts. You are looking at 15 free agents, if the 17 mil per is correct that's going to be 275 million for them alone. 275 mil, and you have 10 more players to sign, including a couple of guys that will want the big bucks in Doumit and McLouth. Do you plan to non tender the Laroches, Snell, Gorzelanny, Capps, Grabow, Wilson, Maholm and Duke? Even if it worked for a year, look forward a couple of years. You will still be paying these guys, but many or most of them will be no better than what the Pirates have now. The best of these guys will be asking for 7 or 8 years, and I doubt that any of them will take less than 3. 3 of the pitchers you sign have had serious arm problems in the past, and more than half of the players on your list are over 30, a few up around and over 35.

One more: How will signing 15 free agents affect your draft status? While we can all cite examples of late rounders that pan out, most good players are drafted in the first and 2nd rounds. You will be forced to sign more and more free agents, while you are paying off the wortless back ends of several long term contracts.

I like the idea of thinking insanely outside the box, I really do, but I can't endorse this. Players over 27 years old are a declining market, and the most overpriced players are free agents late in their prime, or just past it. Even if there was going to be a discount, which hasn't been the case so far (I have benefit of some hidsight that you didn't when you wrote this), it's still an extreme example of buying high.

The Pirates, for many years, have wasted money and draft picks by signing mid level free agents that are not discernably better than what they already had. If they want to get out of the hole, they need to develop young players and stop trading them away (Aramis Ramirez, et all), and quit signing mediocre free agents.

Or they can just go out and sign em all, what the hell, I'm ok with it. It reminds me of something, can't put my finger on it.....

Oh wait, our economy!!! That's even better, they can ask for a bailout from the Government when they go bust, which they sure as HELL would do.
1:16 PM Dec 20th
 
dtoddwin
Yes, it is insane. First you have to finance the acquisitions. No bank is going to lend the money to ownership and they can't currently afford such an outlay.

Second comparing the amount spent to A-Rod's contract is comparing apples to oranges. A-Rod's contract is over ten years, this is an single season expenditure.

Third what if you sign four of these guys and that's all you get? So, you increase your costs substantially, but you don't make the playoffs.

Fourth, the belief that they will substantially increase revenue in order to pay for the expenditures is complete folly. Do you honestly believe the working people of Pittsburgh have the finances for substantially higher ticket prices? One of the team's major advertising sponsors, GM, declined to reup this week because of the fragile state of the economy. They've been a long time sponsor. They aren't a sponsor because the team is winning or losing, they are a sponsor because they want their name in the market.

It's a nice concept for a fantasy baseball team. I reality it is so implausible, unless you are the Yanks, Red Sox, Dodgers, etc. that it is absurd. It is not grounded in any economic reality.
12:10 PM Dec 12th
 
RoelTorres
Hi PWHjort,

"This is quite possibly the most insane proposal I've ever heard..."

No, it isn't.

9:53 AM Dec 10th
 
PHjort
This is quite possibly the most insane proposal I've ever heard this side of offering a major-league deal to Mark Prior.
4:59 PM Dec 8th
 
evanecurb
Write the book and let the marketing gurus at your publishing house come up with a title. Now, back to work. Time's a wastin'
6:31 PM Nov 27th
 
RoelTorres
evan,

Those are pretty good titles. I was toying with titles like:
--The Worst Team Ever
--The Worst Team of All-Time
--Hopeless
--When the Losing Never Ends
--Steel City Blues
--The Curse of Roberto Clemente, etc.
Something that describes 15+ years of losing.

I don't know if I can hit that February deadline, but I should definitely be able to whip out a completed draft in 2009...
2:24 PM Nov 27th
 
evanecurb
How about The Irate Pirates. (pronounced (I rate Pie rates). subtitled: We're mad as hell, and we're not going to take it anymore."

Or: "Sixteen is Enough!" the year the Pirates finally got serious

or: "Honus Speaks" The story of how an immortal returned from beyond to reclaim his legacy.

I have more if you would like to hear them. No more excuses. I will expect a draft of the first chapter on my e-desk by Feb. 1.
7:36 PM Nov 26th
 
RoelTorres
Evan,

Thank you for your comprehensive overview of options. Because you have covered the literary end, I took it upon myself to look into the cinematic options available to the Pirates. It turns out that Little Big League, Major Leagues, and Angels in the Outfield also have some underused strategems:

1) Hire a little kid to manage your team. He will make the game more fun by introducing concepts like the hidden ball trick. You will win finish above .500.
2) Find a female owner you dislike. Motivate yourself by a desire to see her naked. Move close to accomplishing this desire with every victory. You will finish above .500.
3) Get divine intervention from supernatural beings patrolling your warning track. They will manipulate the outcomes of baseball games in your favor. You will finish above .500.

Evan, upon your recommendation, I will immediately begin work on a book about the Pirates quest to finish at .500 (or better!) next year. When the book is completed and published to great acclaim, I want you to promise that you will remember this little exchange. My first obstacle is coming up with a title worthy of such a project. If only I can overcome this stumbling block, I suspect that writing the rest of it will be easy...
1:06 PM Nov 26th
 
evanecurb
I consulted some literary sources (Damn Yankees, Shoeless Joe, the Natural), and it turns out that the Pirates have multiple options open to them in addition to your suggestion:

1. Make a deal with the devil.
2. Acquire the Natural from the minors, but keep him away from the owner's daughter.
3. Release all of your current players and move the team to a cornfield in Iowa. Honus Wagner will play shortstop and bat cleanup. The Great Roberto will bat third and play right field. Not sure what to do for road games, as this team won't travel well.
4. Bring back Billy Martin from the other side. He could always turn teams around for a year or two. I realize this idea in the literature, not yet anyway. This could be the idea for your big novel, Roel. You can thank me later. Now get started on it already.
11:41 AM Nov 26th
 
RoelTorres
Hi SouthSideCubsFan,

Thanks for the kind words. I guess the reason I singled out the Pirates is that they are the only team in danger of setting the all-time sports record for most consecutive losing seasons. When you reach the point where you have not had a winning record since 1992, it's easy to throw in the towel and consider things hopeless. I just wanted to point out that things are never hopeless, even if it would take extreme measures to reverse your fortunes.
11:29 AM Nov 25th
 
dburba
Why limit this to the Pirates? I know this is more of a thought experiment than anything, but there are maybe four, five teams in the league that wouldn't be greatly improved by the signings of all these guys. This seems more like a way to build a great team on this year's free agents, to which I say ... so what? (But I like your writing, Roel, so keep 'em coming).
5:17 AM Nov 25th
 
RoelTorres
Right. Another way of saying "IOUs, merchandise credit, or something other than cash" would be "deferred salary, incentive clauses, or stock options." With an inventive front office, and creative contract structuring, I think that the Pirates could find a way to make this work. I know I would.
11:01 PM Nov 23rd
 
evanecurb
Conor: Roel's right. The Pirates can sign all of them. If they ultimately can't pay them, the players will have to accept an IOU, merchandise credits, or something other than cash on the barrel head. It's for the good of the team and the great people of Pittsburgh.
8:49 PM Nov 23rd
 
RoelTorres
Hi Conor,

I don't really know how many of the free agents the Pirates could afford, because I don't have access to their financial books. But the great thing about this plan is that teams in Major League Baseball don't have a salary cap. So the Pirates could sign all of the suggested players, if they wanted to.


3:41 PM Nov 22nd
 
vtek88
There's no doubt that signing all these free agents would help, but how many of them do you think the could afford? I mean you just said that signing 14 new free agents, 4 or 5 of which most likely want 9 digit salaries, is possible. I can see them signing maybe one of the big free agents, and a few smaller ones, but that's about it.
2:48 PM Nov 22nd
 
RoelTorres
Trailbzr,

Thank you for your correction. Now we can all rest easy knowing that the Orioles have a full two more years to win their next World Series, as opposed to the unreasonable expectation that they have to win it all in 2009.
1:41 PM Nov 21st
 
Trailbzr
Yeah, I think your proposal may be the answer to an ancient riddle.

BTW, in my earlier post I should have said the Orioles never waited more than 13 years (not 12) between Series wins.

12:51 PM Nov 21st
 
RoelTorres
Hi Trailbzr,

I know that Wieters is not the answer to all your problems. But with Markakis, Adam Jones, Matusz, and Tillman, and Arrieta -- the Orioles have a much better young talent base than Pittsbugh. And even if Wieters does not live up to all expectations, it's better to have him in your organization than to intentionally pass on him to save money like the Pirates did.

"My essay is a Rosetta Stone for the Pirates problems." How was that? Did I use the phrase properly in the context of a sentence?
12:24 PM Nov 21st
 
Trailbzr
Yeah, Wieters should be a real good player about the time Brian Roberts has to stop playing second base (they're 9.5 years apart in age, and probably won't be the nucleus of the same good team).

Years ago, I participated in a Usenet group discussing the O's, and one unpopular participant sometimes said of a player that he "had a Rosetta Stone around his neck." A lot of discussants jumped on him for not knowing what a Rosetta Stone meant. But I think it makes sense to describe a guy like Wieters, who's supposed to be solution to all our problems, and so can't possibly live up to exaggerated expectations.
11:43 AM Nov 21st
 
RoelTorres
Hi evan,

I am so glad I have you running wingman on the math. This makes much life easier for me. If you field the salary questions, I can field all the logic questions, and we will be able to convince everyone on the plan's inherent genius.

Gah! Dempster's already gone? I didn't know that. No worries. We can plug in Randy Johnson or Oliver Perez to take those starts. The plan lives on.
9:58 AM Nov 21st
 
RoelTorres
Hi Trailbzr,

Yup, 16 is the all-sports record for sports team in major leagues in North America. The Pirates aren't doing anything halfway. They are on the verge of history, and they take no prisoners.

The Orioles, with 11 straight losing seasons, currently hold the 2nd longest losing season streak in Major League Baseball. They also have a better talent base and a far better crop of minor league prospects (including the spectacular Matt Wieters, who the Pirates chose to pass on.)

Early indications are that the economic climate will not slow down the New York juggernauts. They have large TV contracts. And even more importantly, they have new stadiums that will bring in an insane amount of revenue. I suspect they will be spenders.
9:42 AM Nov 21st
 
evanecurb
Roel: You are right. The Pirates could definitely make most of the money back in higher ticket revenue, higher TV rights,and post season revenue. I figure $60 million in regular season revenue, $50 million in TV rights, and $27.6 million in post season revenue. That adds up to $137.6 million, which is, by definition, most of it. (137.6 / 275 = 50.03%). What is taking them so long? They've already lost out on Dempster.
9:20 AM Nov 21st
 
Trailbzr
Didn't know 16 was the all-sport record. The Orioles had their 11th this year, and to that think before this streak started, the O's had never gone more than 12 straight years without winning the World Series.

I'm waiting to see if the current decline of the finance sector is going to cause a similar decline in the long-term fortunes of the New York metro area, and hence its teams' ability to pay commanding salaries.
5:36 AM Nov 21st
 
RoelTorres
Hi evan,

I have also played my share of Monopoly. My board games of choice growing up were usually Risk or Stratego. In college, we played a lot of chess. These days, I find myself mostly playing Scrabble. And I am close to being undefeated in a niche board game called Balderdash. I've only played it a handful of times, but that game really suits my strengths.

Market inefficiencies are not a constant. They are a variable. A lot of people say that the current inefficiency is in analyzing defense, because smart teams are doing a better job figuring out the value of a defensive player than teams that are behind the curve. Whether this is true or not, someone needs to properly identify the inefficiency. Because, as you mention, there are teams out there with A) smart front-office executives, and B) money to burn.

...and speaking of money to burn. You write, "Which is another way of saying that they should spend the $275 million this year. It's the only approach that seems to make sense." When you have identified the only approach that makes sense, there is no other choice but to follow through. I think we can all agree on that.

$275 million for a solid team seems very reasonable. Especially when you remember that A-Rod alone signed a contract for $252 million back in January of 2001. The team could make most of it back in higher ticket prices, TV rights, and post-season revenues, right?

Thanks for doing the math. Appreciate it.
12:02 AM Nov 21st
 
evanecurb
Roel:

The Pirates' last 16 years hasn't been a total loss. They have a beautiful ballpark and they did bring back those cool sleeveless uniforms after years of ugly polyester crap.

If we figure $17 million per year is the rate for the average free agent listed here, then their salary for the 14 free agents is $238 million in 2009, plus luxury tax, plus the salaries of the other eleven guys, so let's call it $275 million.

Actually, the Pirates hired a new GM last year who appears to be pretty smart and has studied the concepts that Oakland, Minnesota, and other small market teams have put into place. The problem is that, as more and more teams learn the Moneyball game, market inefficiencies become more rare and the ability to recognize them becomes less unique.

I remember in college we used to play Monopoly in the dorm (oh we were a wild bunch). I learned early on that the most undervalued property set on the board, by a wide margin, is the orange set near free parking (New York Avenue, St. James Place, Tennessee Avenue). My strategy the first few times I played was to trade properties with other players so that I would end up with the orange set. Once the other players became familiar with the true value of the orange set, its value became higher in trade and much more difficult to obtain. So the strategy no longer worked. That is what is starting to happen with the Oakland A's, I think. The Red Sox have Moneyball type knowledge AND big market dollars. Other teams, such as the Indians, now recognize the value of first round draft choices, top minor league prospects, on base percentage, and control of the strike zone, and these qualities are now becoming properly valued. In short, it will be very difficult for the Pirates to do what Oakland did, unless the new GM has unique insight into the next generation of qualities that will be undervalued.

Which is another way of saying that they should spend the $275 million this year. It's the only approach that seems to make sense. If the current owner doesn't want to do it, he can sell the team to Mark Cuban. He'll get it done.
11:40 PM Nov 20th
 
RoelTorres
That was just a pure guess on my part. Does someone have a formula to determine projected team salaries? Can someone come up with a decent estimate? Maybe one of the more mathematically-inclined readers can help us out and answer jollydoger's question. Thanks in advance.
10:23 PM Nov 20th
 
RoelTorres
Hi Jollydodger,

I don't know. I don't have a good answer to that. Eyeballing that team, I'm gonna estimate 17 or 18? That might be low.
10:16 PM Nov 20th
 
jollydodger
Can we get a salary estimate on that team for 2009?
9:55 PM Nov 20th
 
RoelTorres
Hi Superdude,

Exactly. I never read Jim Baker's piece, but that would depend on the free agents being selfless and giving up money. I think that would be unnecessary. Pittsburgh should just offer some above-market contracts and reap the rewards.
9:29 PM Nov 20th
 
jdbranno
Jim Baker had an idea that all the best free agents in one offseason should sign cheap one-year deals with the same team, thus guaranteeing a World Series win. That would be fun. Never happen, of course, unlike your Pirates plan, which is practically a sure thing.
9:05 PM Nov 20th
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy