Remember me

And in a Related Story

January 12, 2010

            Former New York Yankee outfielder Roger Maris has apologized in a televised interview, broadcast early Wednesday morning on HVEN TV, for using eight extra games and expansion pitching to break the single-season home run record of previous record holder Babe Ruth.   Maris was interviewed by the sainted sportscaster Curt Gowdy in a studio just two miles inside the pearly gates late Tuesday afternoon.

            Maris, breaking into tears numerous times throughout the interview, acknowledged that he did in fact play 161 games in 1961, as many observers had insisted for years that he must have, and also that he did hit some home runs against pitchers who might not have been in the league were it not for expansion.

            “It was the worst thing I have ever done, and I am so ashamed,” Maris sobbed. 

            Asked by Gowdy why it has taken him 48 years to apologize, Maris said he was acting on the advice of his attorneys, and also expressed a desire to protect his family.   “I didn’t feel it was wrong at the time,” Maris said.    “Everybody else was using the eight extra games.   Why shouldn’t I?”

            Maris’ belated apology was immediately denounced by several snarky commentators, who felt that Maris must be insincere, since Maris suggested that he could have broken the record without the eight extra games and the expansion pitchers.   

            “Sure I could have,” Maris said.   “If you’ll look, you’ll see that I didn’t hit ANY home runs in 1961 in the first ten games of the season, so actually I hit the 61 homers in just 151 games.  The last 151.”

            “Everybody else in the league was hitting home runs off of Pete Burnside,” Maris said.   “I figured why shouldn’t I?   If any young hitter ever asked me about it, I would plead with them not to hit any home runs off of Pete Burnside or Ed Palmquist.    It’s just not worth it, what it does to your soul.”

            Maris also announced that he had called the widow of the late Babe Ruth, and apologized to them as well for outperforming the Bambino.

            “What did she say to you?” Gowdy asked? 

            “She asked if I could send along some Budweiser with the apology,” Maris responded.

            “She still regards her husband as the legitimate home run record holder,” Gowdy remarked.

            “She has every right to,” Maris responded. 

            Maris’ agent had requested that Howard Cosell do the interview, but Cosell could not be located, and it is suspected that he may be working for HVEN’s arch-rival HLL, the hottest network on the air.   

            In a related story, Babe Ruth has requested an interview, in which it is rumored that he will acknowledge using a corked bat for most of his career, taking advantage of outrageous favoritism from the umpires, and being an unworthy role model for America’s youth due to his widely reported drinking and whoring.    That interview is being delayed while Ruth tries to figure out who held the home run record before he did, as he needs to call somebody’s widow or children and apologize in vague, unintelligible terms.    Among the candidates for Ruth’s apology are the widows and descendants of  Gavy Cravath, Buck Freeman, Roger Connor and Ned Williamson.   If you know where any of these people can be located, please call 1-800-RAPTURE or contact Rick Warren personally with details.

 
 

COMMENTS (18 Comments, most recent shown first)

schoolshrink
kev and ventboys,

I do not think there is a system in place where you will not create a host of other problems. The legality, or lack thereof, of PED's will not change the impression that they should be considered legal in some circumstances. A hypothetical situation: a player gets a diagnosis because of some condition, that is considered minor and treatable. During the course of treatment, the therapy includes steroid use to treat the one condition, and conveniently the positive benefit of the treatment enhances one's chances to play at the highest level. Considering the number of diagnoses we have to identify ailments in players, and that we could control the treatment by requiring only MLB doctors to meet with the players, what would stop the doctors themselves from prescribing steroids as a regular protocol? The medical diagnosis would serve as a smokescreen to justify giving guys PED's. Rather than chastising the players for doping, it would be better for MLB to do what they are doing now: 50 game, 100 game, lifetime suspensions for repeated rules violations.

People break dumb rules and laws all of the time. Sometimes a dumb rule or law is one where someone decides it would be better to ban something, write a bill and gets support for doing so that gets immediate support, and over time it is found the rule provides no benefit other than to try to identify the rule breakers. On the other hand, a dumb rule or law is one which is simply not enforced. PED's fit in that category, in my opinion, and I cannot blame the players because the proper oversight was not in place to control what happened. There is now oversight, and the game is much better for it.
1:51 PM Jan 17th
 
ventboys
Kev, I really like your idea. Sometimes the simplest solutions are the best.

I'm not sure how to go about it, though. I would prefer it if there was some way to compel users to consult medical experts before beginning a program. It would make sense to keep an eye on how the law goes with ED drugs. Elective surgery is legal, so elective body enhancing by drugs sounds reasonable to me as well. Both should require a doctor, I think.
11:34 PM Jan 14th
 
Kev
The real issue, as has been pointed out endlessly and ignored, is the effect of PEDs/HGH on kids. High schoolers are already using. Why not make it illegal to consume (clearly identified )PEDs/HGH until the age of 18? If our leaders can send our kids to war to kill and be killed, one would suppose it would be only fair to allow the kids to say yea or nay to PEDs/HGH. They are old enough to make an informed decision, and young enough to bulk up for sports, and their bodies have reached near maximum growth.

At one point in recent history, it was every teen or pre-teen's fantasy to stand on the corner with a cigarette dangling Bogart-style from his mouth. That's been largely eradicated. The new threat can be similarly defeated.
1:14 PM Jan 14th
 
Kev
OK, let's have it: why wasn't I included? Do you think Maris thought of breaking the record all by himself?

Drungo Larue Hazewood




11:44 PM Jan 13th
 
cderosa
Hi 'jeffsol': On "reflective of the era" i.e. Teapot Dome, I'm hesitant. There are famous instances of corruption in many eras, and I'd have to see a lot more to link the baseball fixing scandals to a pervasive ethos particular to the era.

On throwing games being an open secret that everyone let get out of hand, you are right, that could describe both scandals. I guess I see a significant difference in degree, though, that justifies eternal ban for game throwers but something more like "you're suspended 50 games" for IPED-users.

Reflecting merely on my own fandom: my team has succeeded with IPED-users and also suffered defeat at the hands of IPED-users. I suspected as much at the time, but kept on enjoying and accepting the results. Therefore, I'm not willing to scapegoat the handful of players who 'fessed up or were exposed, and exempt myself.
I would like the game to steer clear of the unfair use of illegal IPEDs by some/half/most of the players. Part of getting clear of that is to not be blinkered by the wishful thinking inherent Bill's "criticizing Mark McGwire is like criticizing Roger Maris" piece.

If I found out my team intentionally lost the World Series (or had it thrown to them), I'd feel a lot different though. It would be a deal-breaker. I would not enjoy or accept the results. And I'd need to feel the problem had been eradicated before I could go back to enjoying them.

For me, suspending Manny Ramirez for 50 games and later enjoying his Hall of Fame speech is just about right. I don't offer that as a prescription for anyone else, it's just how I feel about it. If people can't enjoy or accept baseball under the condition of some/half/most of the players using IPEDs, I understand where they're coming from, and I would never tell them that they're wrong or being silly.


3:05 PM Jan 13th
 
tangotiger
McGwire's sole "sin" is that he puts the other players in a position to endanger their own health if they wanted to compete with him. Those players committed a "sin" by not creating a workplace that had the controls in place to prevent the choice. Basically, the players exposed themselves as selfish cowards for not doing what Rick Helling was telling them to do.

And the largest sin of all is that we have The Holy Writers wasting our time with their thoughts on the matter (James and Poz excluded).
12:49 PM Jan 13th
 
ventboys
On 1st and 10 today- Skip Bayless and Jemele Hill will be discussing which was worse: Ed Cicotte throwing the spitter, or throwing the World Series....
12:42 PM Jan 13th
 
CharlesSaeger
Since Mark McGwire put chemicals of potentially serious health detriment in his body for our entertainment, shouldn't we be apologizing to him?

As for comparisons to Joe Jackson, if we keep in the entertainment vein, Jackson turned a contest into professional wrestling without the showboating that wrestling fans like. McGwire's sins -- and frankly, I don't think they are sins -- were to increase the competitiveness of the game, and to increase the entertainment to the fannies in the seats.
11:43 AM Jan 13th
 
shaneyfelt
Again, reading the comments and the connections to "roids" being accepted as any game violation would be, this has to be born on the shoulders clubhouse management who accepted the known illegal activity inside. But also keep in mind that as early as 1991 - http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=steroidsExc&num=19 - in a document Titled "Baseball's Drug Policy and Prevention Program," a memo was sent to all major-league clubs on June 7, 1991 by then-commissioner Fay Vincent. He spelled out components of the program, and ordered, "This prohibition applies to all illegal drugs and controlled substances, including steroids." Then On May 15, 1997, acting commissioner Bud Selig distributed a nearly identical version of the drug memo, again citing steroids and directing clubs to post the policy in clubhouses and distribute copies to players.

But now the idea that because widespread usage of Roids was accepted in the clubhouses should lead to it being "accepted" strikes me rather odd in light of the now testing and enforcing drawing play back to preRoids. Until that is changed and the very powerful players Union can get that overturned, it would appear the ban is now in place.

But I would be in favor of the HOFers taking over the installing of new members like McGwire and would love to hear how George Brett, Mike Schmidt, etc would handle the Users vs the game violators.

That being said, I love baseball and find this one of the most interesting stories of my time that has legs because it involved the top stars of my time.
9:49 AM Jan 13th
 
jeffsol
@Chris DeRosa -- Which problem (performance enhancing drug use or fixing games) was not a "widespread, semi-open-secret problem we all let get out of hand"? Other than the fact that probably none of us were alive at the time of the '19 series, that describes both situations equally well. The series was NOT an isolated incident just the latest and biggest of a series of incidents and, like steroids, reflective of society as a whole (see: Teapot Dome)
9:47 AM Jan 13th
 
cderosa
Mark McGwire is to Roger Maris as "taking illegal performance-enhancing drugs is to "universal condition of the game" is a specious analogy unless you can demonstrate that nearly all players of McGwire's era also took illegal performance-enhancing drugs. That's a possibility, I suppose, but it has yet to be demonstrated.

On the other hand, Mark McGwire : Joe Jackson is also a specious analogy. Can't just blame a few people for a widespread, semi-open-secret problem we all let get out of hand.
8:48 AM Jan 13th
 
rpriske
There are many ways to aquire steroids legally. Any assumption that they were not should be taken up with the law, not MLB.
8:40 AM Jan 13th
 
schoolshrink
mauimike, there is no absolute proof the steroids enhanced performance. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence, which is subject to interpretation, and anything subject to interpretation cannot have a perfect correlation (e.g., steroid use caused enhanced performance.) Did marijuana help Michael Phelps perform? It seems hard to imagine given what we know about cannibis, but it could not be ruled out. As for sportswriters, and mostly the blowholes on radio and T.V., it is typical to see them whine about a topic as it is in their best interest to do so. They have to be on top of the news, and they have learned that doing so gets them ratings. Even so, some are better at it than others, and some drive us all bananas, until we switch the dial and tune them out, of course. You inspired me to start a reader threat: What radio or T.V. sports talk personalities do the best jobs and why?

Rick, my problem with your argument is that you are drawing a distinction when many more factors than steroids have led to increased performance. Athletes use drugs and performance enhancers all of the time, whether prescribed legally, provided at General Nutrition Center or another health food place, or at BALCO or elsewhere illegally. That we demonize steroids in this day and age does not mean their presence has been the worst thing that has happened to the sport, but it has led to unfair pressure on players to take steroids, knowing it was illegal and against the rules. I do not blame the players individually for this, and understand why McGwire felt pressure to use steroids and andro: in spite of his natural talent, in the back of his mind was the fear of what might have happened if he did not take them.

Unfortunately, we ended up chastising McGwire for not coming clean, but accept at face value when A-Rod and Andy Pettite admitted taking roids for just limited periods of time, conveniently when it would do the least damage to their reputations. Do you really believe Pettite took steroids only twice, and is he really any more believable than Mark McGwire? A-Rod was not roided up in Seattle, really? I do not blame Mark for his tap dance around the truth, but unfortunately for him he just has not been as successful at it as those who admitted steroid use earlier. A-Rod gets away with it because he is still great and we want to see great play regardless of his past.

Far from baseball being immune from participating in use of illegal drugs, baseball has been absolutely guilty in its involvement. But rather than blaming the union or MLB management, it is the players who are chastised for taking steroids, as they did take them after all. But again, it is the league and union that deserve the most blame, and it probably would be in the league's and union's best interest to lay off the players on this topic. The steroids era happened, and roids need to be controlled. As that is now happening, we need to lay off of the players and vote them in to the Hall of Fame based on the merits in their careers.
2:00 AM Jan 13th
 
shaneyfelt
As I have posted before, I still am confused as to how MLB, the Players, Writers, Fans and most importantly management of the clubhouses get around the fact that this drug use was/is illegal. This is not a Billy Martin or Ty Cobb drunk, this is illegal drug use; but, somehow you and others are arguing that baseball should be immune from illegal drugs.

While I get your point - not one point you brought up is a Felony in the US for Maris, not one. Maris breaks game rules, but they don't include "drug dealers" and other outside third parties in a clubhouse to consume the cheat. Just Maris, himself and who ever was keeping score and a pitcher (but all internal to the game).

Again, I understand the argument, legalize the use and allow it in baseball because it has no more impact other than extending the player's baseball form well past their prime. Fine, legalize it, until then, I don't get the promotion of the acceptance of drug dealers in the club houses.
12:02 AM Jan 13th
 
mauimike
These guys took these things to make them perform better and play longer. I don't see how this is evil. It's their lives and bodies. Is there absolute proof that these things worked? Wouldn't it be refreshing if Michael Phelps had said, "Yeah, I smoke a little, but I'm still the greatest swimmer there ever was. 16 medals, of which 14 were gold. And remember, the guy in the White House did a thing or two. Grow up and deal with it." Are there a more sanctimonious group of ***holes than sports writers?
11:25 PM Jan 12th
 
schoolshrink
Isn't Jimmy Swaggart around to take penance? Rick Warren needs a scandal before he is fit for the job. At least he did not do an Oral Roberts and insist the God would call him home, but if he had he might have gotten more than 2.4M; Roberts got more than 9 mil and that was over 20 years ago. I guess tithing isn't what it used to be.

My favorite Jimmy Swaggart moment: he exclaimed he "sinned against you, Lord" for soliciting a prostitute. Four years later, when he was caught doing it again, he responded, "The Lord told me it's none of your business." He would have been the Bambino's kind of guy.
9:25 PM Jan 12th
 
belewfripp
This article is 100% pure win.
8:56 PM Jan 12th
 
rgregory1956
As someone who thinks both Maris and McGwire should be in the Hall, I couldn't be more supportive of your report. I'm still wondering, however, if Maris told the whole truth. Was Mantle also using those extra 8 games?
7:20 PM Jan 12th
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy