Remember me

The Signing of Junichi Tazawa

December 2, 2008

Blind

Blind faith can be bad.  Blind faith can get you killed.  Blind faith in your leader, or your government, or your religion, can lead to a world of problems.  When you stop asking questions, when you accept everything at face value, you can make yourself vulnerable.  You can make yourself weak.

 

But sometimes, faith is all you have to go on.  Sometimes, when there’s no hard evidence, when there’s no reliable information, in those moments you just have to look inside and ask yourself – what do I believe in?

 

This is an essay about baseball.  This is an essay about faith.  I’m asking myself the question.  And I know the answer. 

 

I know what I believe in.  And, for now, that’s all I need to know.

 

The First Step

According to Tony Massarotti in the December 1, 2008 edition of The Boston Globe, the Boston Red Sox signed Japanese amateur Junichi Tazawa to a three-year contract worth $3 million.  I was excited by the development, intrigued by the player.  I wanted to learn more. So after surfing the web for a minute, I looked up an article on ESPN.com by their expert on Japanese Baseball, Jim Allen.  Here are some of the more interesting quotes about Tazawa lifted from Allen’s piece:

 

“He lacks velocity, stamina and the ability to keep the ball down.”

 

“At 22, Tazawa is unlikely to throw much harder than he does now; his fastball barely tops 90 mph when he is rested, and he struggled to hit 88 mph at the end of last season.”

 

“In Class A or Double-A, Tazawa likely will get hit harder and harder as the season wears on.”

 

“The pitcher's body is too stiff to allow him to keep the ball down in the zone and Tazawa lacks the smarts and toughness to hang in and learn the lessons needed to apply his talent in the majors.”

 

Huh.  Well, that was hardly a glowing report.  He lacks velocity, stamina, and the ability to keep the ball down?  He barely tops 90 when he’s rested?  He’s going to get pounded in Single-A?  He lacks smarts and toughness?  What the hell?

 

Just to be certain, I wanted to check the background on Jim Allen, and to see what made him qualified to write about Japanese baseball prospects for ESPN.  Searching the internet, here’s what I found on the man, in his own words:

 

“My name is Jim Allen and I work on the sports desk of The Daily Yomiuri as a page editor. I have been writing a weekly column called The Hot Corner since February 1999. Before that I published an annual guide to Japanese baseball for a few years that imitated a number of things in Bill James Baseball Abstracts.”

 

Okay.  That certainly seems like a reasonable set of credentials.  It sure seems like he should know what he’s talking about.

 

Still…  I can’t shake the feeling that he’s wrong.  Dead wrong.

 

And I have nothing to base this on.  No evidence, no information. 

 

Just faith.

 

I don’t know if that’s enough.  I don’t know if it will hold up.  But in this case – it’s all I’ve got.

 

A Man and his Limitations

Look, I’m not a scout.  I get confused when I read scouting reports that say a pitcher has a long arm action that creates good depth and tilt on his breaking pitches.  I don’t know what that means.  A long arm action?  Good depth?  Good tilt?  I have no idea.  I’m not a scout.

 

And I’m not an analyst.  I like statistics.  But I’m not good at creating them.  I’m not good at finding hidden information.  My strength is not in working with mathematics, or formulas, or numbers.  I can do it.  But it’s not my comfort zone.  It’s not really what I bring to the table.

 

I’m a writer.  I have a literary background.  I like to put words together, to try and form sentences and paragraphs and come up with something interesting in the end.  That’s my training.  That’s my experience.

 

I understand that I write for Bill James Online.  I understand the usefulness of empirical evidence.  I understand that knowledge is better than guesswork, and that truth is more valuable than opinion.  I get it.  Yes.  I agree.

 

And no, I’ve never seen Junichi Tazawa pitch.  I’ve never seen a radar gun reading on the man.  I’ve never seen a batter swinging late and failing to make contact as a high fastball comes buzzing to the plate belt high.  I’ve never heard the catcher’s glove pop like a gunshot in the forest as Tazawa’s fastball comes humming in.  Other guys, I know.  I know Josh Beckett’s fastball.  And Joel Zumaya’s.  And Jamie Moyer’s.  But Junichi Tazawa’s?  No.  I have no familiarity with it.  None. 

 

Jim Allen knows a lot more about Japanese baseball than I do.  I concede that.  It’s not even close.  He works at the sports desk of the Daily Yomiuri.  He used to write an annual guide to Japanse baseball for years.  In contrast, I can’t name half the teams that compete in the NPB, Japan’s highest league.  He’s informed.  I’m ignorant.  I admit that.     

 

But I still think he’s wrong.

 

God’s Radar Gun

Sportswriters are allowed to be wrong.  No problem.  That’s the nature of sportswriting.  They can have opinions that are wrong, like “Ryan Howard is the Most Valuable Player in the National League.”  Sure.  That’s the nature of opinions.  And they can have predictions that are wrong, like “The Indians are going to win the World Series.”  That’s fine.  Again, that’s the nature of predictions.  But there are some instances where it’s important to be right.  There are some pieces of information that need to be reported correctly.  Like facts.  It’s important to get facts straight.  Like a radar gun reading.  Like a fastball velocity.

 

I don’t know anything about Junichi Tazawa.  I have no relevant knowledge of the player, no direct firsthand observation of the man.  I could not pick him out of a lineup.  But despite all this, I have confidence that he has velocity.  I have confidence that he can throw harder than 90 mph when he is rested.  I have confidence that he’s not going to get shelled in Single-A.  The reason I think these things is that I have faith.  I believe.

 

I believe in the Boston Red Sox.  The franchise, the organization, the team.  I have faith in their general manager, Theo Epstein.  I trust their scouting and development staff.  Yes, I do.  I don’t think they’re always right.  No.  But I think that they have very good reasons for the things they do, even when they’re wrong.  When they win a World Series then let Derek Lowe, and Pedro Martinez walk away as free agents – I believe.  When they win another World Series, then trade away Manny Ramirez in the middle of the following year – I believe.  And deep down, in my heart, when I ask myself the question on whether Theo Epstein and the scouting and development team of the Boston Red Sox would spend $3 million dollars to sign a kid who throws an 88 mph fastball and is destined to be shelled in Single-A, well…  let’s just say that the answer I come up with is very different than the one Jim Allen provides. 

 

The Ceremonial First Pitch

You can have faith in many things in life.  Like your President, your minister, or your God.  Like your parents, your employer, or your girlfriend.  That’s fine.  It’s good to have faith in something in this world.  It really is.  In my case, I realize that I have faith in my baseball team.  I do.  I have faith that it is well-run.  I have faith that the people making the decisions it are smart and educated and knowledgeable.  And I have faith that when they are faced with a question, with a problem, they will do everything possible to do the right thing, to do what is best for the team and, therefore, (through the magical transitive property of baseball) what is best for their fanbase.  Isn’t that all a baseball fan can truly ask for?  I have that faith.  I believe.

 

So.  Either Junichi Tazawa throws 88 mph, or he throws harder.  Either he will get shelled in Single-A, or he won’t.  If Jim Allen is spot-on with his scouting report, if he’s accurate in his assessment of Tazawa’s abilities, then it will be my responsibility to come forward and to acknowledge that.  Because knowledge is better than guesswork, and truth is always more valuable than opinion.  The funny thing about baseball is that, in the end, these debates don’t get settled by writers putting their opinions down on the page.  Nah.  They get settled on the diamond, in between the white lines, on the scoreboard at the end of the game.  Sometimes, a fan’s faith is rewarded.  And sometimes, it is dashed.  In this case, I guess we’ll just have to wait until Junichi Tazawa takes the mound for the first time next year, rears back, and either fires a pitch fast enough to strengthen a man’s belief system, or, conversely, to shatter it.

 

 

 

 

 

If you have any thoughts you want to share, I would love to hear from you.  I can be contacted at roeltorres@post.harvard.edu.  Thank you.

 
 

COMMENTS (16 Comments, most recent shown first)

RoelTorres
Hi Ryan,

Thanks for responding to Matthew's question. I think that you comments are in line with what I've read and heard for the local media. It does seem that Tazawa's services were in demand, and that there were multiple organizations who coveted the pitcher. I think that the general consensus is that he would be an asset to an organization, rather than a detriment.
9:11 PM Dec 5th
 
RoelTorres
Hi tiller88,

Thanks for bringing up serveral useful pieces of information. That's a good point about slow guns (used by scouts) and fast guns (used by TV broadcasts, and ballpark scoreboards.) There is going to be a discrepancy depending on which brand you use. I know all the scouts tend to have a pretty standardized slow gun, which is generally considered more "accurate" than the fast gun. You're right. Even a radar gun reading can be a subjective battleground, as opposed to an objective declaration.

And I agree, Keith Law and Rob Neyer tend to be more invested in holding open and honest discussions, rather than promoting the ESPN brand. Well, what I mean is that they seem to value getting to truth above any other formal agenda. That seems to be a good approach. Still, I think it's a little unfair to criticize fans for putting stock in Jim Allen's report, since the man a) does have a lot of subject expertise, and b) there is very little concrete info on Junichi Tazawa to work with. Allen may have been the first person from a credible source to write a scouting profile on the pitcher. It's pretty natural for a lot of folks to have been drawn to the article as a resource.

Finally, I just want to point out that I have no opinion on whether Jim Allen is "smart" or not. Actually, I tend to suspect that he is relatively smart. I think he just happens to be wrong in this one, specific instance.
9:05 PM Dec 5th
 
RyanTorres
Matthew,
From reports, the Sox beat out offers from Atlanta, Seattle and Texas. The Seattle Japanese scouting system has netted Ichiro and Kazu Sasaki before him, so I would tend to give them some creedence. Also Tazawa was a consensus first pick in the Japanese Pro League, so their scouts seemed to think very highly of him.So highly, they decided to create rules, specifically because of Tazawa's free agent signing, that punish the American "poaching" of prospects before they are drafted.
8:23 PM Dec 4th
 
tiller88
roel,

I agree with your premise that "facts" should be pretty self-explanatory. However, when it comes to such facts as radar gun readings, the truth is not always a neat and tidy thing. I'm sure you're well aware of the terms "fast gun" and "slow gun" that describe various brands of radar guns. Someone monitoring the exact same pitch can get readings off by 3 to 5 mph depending on the make and model of their gun. The type of gun to which Allen refers is not mentioned, so we are left to guess, much as we are left to guess at his motivations, which is never a good thing to do when trying to analyze objectively.

If you spend any time on ESPN, you know that they have some of the least "trustworthy" (if that's the right word) "experts" covering many of their sports - especially baseball (time for a moment of silence for the end of FireJoeMorgan.com). One thing about Law and Rob Neyer, they show little in the way of "brand loyalty" so to speak - they are not afraid to throw the B.S. flag on anyone, even those "experts" collecting paychecks from the same employer. So it comes as no surprise to me that Law would fire a shot across Allen's bow when he believes Allen's take is off the mark.

It should be interesting monitoring Tazawa's progress over the next three years, to see if Allen is smarter than we all seem to think.

6:43 PM Dec 4th
 
RoelTorres
Hi Conor,

Thanks for the nice words. One of the difficulties for a sports fan is what happens when your faith goes unrewarded. That's a really unfortunate position to be in. I know that Cubs fans are currently asking some difficult questions, wondering if their belief in the team will ever pay off. As Sox fans, we can certainly empathize with how that feels.

Boston sports fans are currently in an enviable position these days, with the Red Sox, Patriots, and Celtics having won six major World Championships in a span of 80 months. I don't know what more I can ask for. It's hard to be too critical of the local franchises when you've been blessed with that kind of run.
3:54 PM Dec 4th
 
vtek88
Nicely put Roel. I think as baseball fans all we can really go on is faith. I've been a die-hard Red Sox fan since 1991 when I was three, so I know all about faith. I remember the lack of faith when Nomar was traded, when we let Pedro and Lowe go, and even when Manny was traded. The last few years have shown me that my faith has been rewarded. I think that you've got it exactly right.
3:36 PM Dec 4th
 
RoelTorres
Hi tiller88,

It's true that I don't have insight on Jim Allen's motivations. And it's true that he is a writer (like Bill) and not an evaluator (like Keith Law.) But whether he has biases or not, he should be able to tell the difference between an 88 mph fastball, and a 93 mph one. You can have biased opinions, and you can make biased predictions, but "facts" should be pretty self-explanatory. Bias shouldn't enter into a radar-gun reading.

Having said that, I would like to once again point out that I am also not a scout/talent evaluator. I'm a writer. But Bill and Jim Allen also deserve credit for being analysts, as well. They can take numbers and draw information and knowledge out of them. There's value there. They have talents that I do not have, and I concede that.

It's interesting that Keith Law would ask: "why would you give credence to that report?" Well, Keith, it was published by ESPN, which is the same site you happen to write for. Basically, the same way I say that I have faith in the Red Sox, ESPN's readers are showing their faith in their reporting. The fact is, there is very little available concrete information on Tazawa. At some point, you need to rely on someone else's opinion.

Yes, the best option is to wait and see how Tazawa performs. But I thought it was important that I express my reservations about Jim Allen's report, and document them for the public record before Tazawa pitches. Because it doesn't take any guts to point out that ESPN Japanese Baseball Expert, Jim Allen, is wrong after the fact, when everything is obvious. It's a lot tougher to question his judgment when I have nothing to go on except my own instincts and the faith I have in the team I root for.
3:21 PM Dec 4th
 
tiller88
roel,

Keith Law of Scouts, Inc., did an article on the Tazawa signing a few days ago. You may be familiar with him, he used to work in the Toronto front office and is a well regarded evaluator of player ability who certainly is not predisposed to build up Boston players with no foundation. In the comments section to his article, here is what he has to say about both the observations of Jim Allen and Nick James, which are similar to Allen's:

"I don't agree with Jim Allen's report, or the report (by James). At all. I don't know why you're giving any credence to that material.... I don't give any weight to those reports because neither writer is an evaluator."

Which is an excellent point - Law is a scout, who (presumably) knows what to look for in present and future player ability. You don't stay relevant in that field for long by being wrong more than right. Allen (and James), as sports writers, simply don't have the same background; being a long-time writer does not automatically make you an expert scout (see Bill Plaschke, Murray Chase, Woody Paige, et al.).

Another thing to consider - what biases do Allen or James bring to their "evaluations"? Allen specifically covers Japan baseball, so perhaps it is not in his interest to aid the siphoning of NPL talent by writing encouraging reports? Maybe that's a reach, but my Masters in history tells me that if you don't try to understand the motives or agendas of writers you run the risk of accepting slanted views as gospel (such as Caesar's "Gallic Wars", for example).

Bottom line - I think your closing view is the right one. Let's see for ourselves what Tazawa brings to the mound and let the results speak for themselves. Perhaps your faith in Theo will turn out to be well-founded.
2:52 PM Dec 4th
 
enamee
Another thing -- how many times has Allen seen this kid pitch? I mean, individual scouts have differing opinions on young players all the time. What would be good is to hear various Japanese scouts' takes on the issues Allen raises.

Also, were other MLB teams in the running? If so - and I assume that's the case, given the dollars involved - then it's not just Allen vs. the Red Sox, but Allen vs. the scouting and player development departments of multiple teams.
1:59 PM Dec 4th
 
RoelTorres
Hi Matthew,

Right. Jim Allen has presented his viewpoint. And I believe it to be wrong because there almost certainly HAS to be evidence that contradicts it. Except that we don't have access to that evidence. I'm sure the Sox know better. I'm sure of it. But I can't prove any of it.

I think that it is very plausible that the Sox had multiple scouts watch him, talked to various sources, and had an abundance of radar gun readings. However, that's an invisible process that's been shielded from public scrutiny. All we can see is the end result. And by knowing the final result, I am forced to infer the work that went on before it.

Jim Allen has knowledge and expertise in Japanese baseball. I have faith in the Sox scouting staff, and their decision-making process. And thus, we find ourselves at odds. But if the Sox spent $3 mil on the kid, I'm not backing down from my position.
1:03 AM Dec 4th
 
enamee
I'm inclined to agree with you, Roel. I mean, yes, the Red Sox have a lot of money, but if you're going to invest $3 million in a young pitcher, you're probably going to do your homework first. You're probably going to send multiple scouts out to see him, talk to a bunch of people, crunch whatever numbers are available. Are we supposed to think that the Red Sox didn't get a lot of radar data before they signed this guy?
11:01 PM Dec 3rd
 
RoelTorres
Hi jalbright,

I certainly hope I didn't imply that Jim Allen was an "old-school hack." As a matter of fact, I think I went to great pains to point out that his level of knowledge is far superior to mine, and included the quote where he mentioned that he wrote books that imitated the Bill James Abstracts. I don't doubt that he's got a high level of expertise on the subject matter (after all, he is ESPN's Japanese Baseball expert.) But in this one instance, his report just doesn't sit right with me, -- despite the lack of any solid, concrete evidence to support my point of view...
2:39 PM Dec 3rd
 
RoelTorres
Hi jalbright,

I certainly hope I didn't imply that Jim Allen was an "old-school hack." As a matter of fact, I think I went to great pains to point out that his level of knowledge is far superior to mine, and included the quote where he mentioned that he wrote books that imitated the Bill James Abstracts. I don't doubt that he's got a high level of expertise on the subject matter (after all, he is ESPN's Japanese Baseball expert.) But in this one instance, his report just doesn't sit right with me, -- despite the lack of any solid, concrete evidence to support my point of view...
2:25 PM Dec 3rd
 
RoelTorres
Hi Ryan,

$3 million for 3 years is not a lot for a free agent, but it is a lot for a 22 year old amateur. 99% of the players drafted this year will not see an amount anywhere close to that contract offer. That's first round pick money, and I can't imagine the Sox would spend first round money on a guy they expect to get shelled in Single-A.

There are reports of him hitting 97, videos where he hits 93, and Jim Allen's ESPN article which has him struggling to hit 90 when rested, and flattening out at 88 on some days. Something doesn't add up. In my opinion, 97 seems high and 88 seems low. Like I said, the reports are conflicting and we'll just have to wait and see.

2:20 PM Dec 3rd
 
jalbright
One thing I will mention is Jim Allen's guides were very much in the Bill James mode of analysis, so he's definitely not just an old school hack. He may not always be right (neither is Bill), but he's a top-notch observer of the Japanese game.
1:50 PM Dec 3rd
 
RyanTorres
A 3 million dollar over 3 year contract is actually not that much. If you look at the bonus babies today, their contracts tend to be in the 8-12 million range over 3-4 years and they are pretty far from major league sure-things. So if "zawa" ends up being a mistake at least it isn't a relatively costly one. And if he works out then at least he isn't caught up in a Japanese contract which can last 8-10 years. Wait until he is 30 to get posted by his Japanese team, or take a low-cost chance on him now? I think this chuice was the smart one. And I've heard reports of him reaching 97 which crappy Youtube videos can neither confirm nor deny:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxRKY_Xg5tQ
The gun hits 149kph = 93mph
1:34 PM Dec 3rd
 
 
©2024 Be Jolly, Inc. All Rights Reserved.|Powered by Sports Info Solutions|Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy